feat: link old BOMs in BOM Creator

[SvbZ3r0]

Foundational work for #38438
@rohitwaghchaure your input is extremely valuable

Pending work:

• Disallow editing sub nodes where data has been pulled from an existing BOM
• Qty edits on a node should propagate downwards if data is pulled from an exisiting BOM
• Validation/checkpoints to ensure direct edits to the Item table do not clash with data from existing BOMs

Nice to have:

• Allow choosing which BOM to use instead of automatically using the default BOM
• Play nice with BOMs that have Scrap Material (feature request for BOM Creator)
• Play nice with Items that have Subcontracting BOMs and with BOMs that have Operations (re: feat: track Semi-finished goods (including subcontracted items) against Job Cards #38341)
• RM table is read only if BOM is selected Hide Raw Materials table in Add Sub Assembly dialog if Use Existing BOM is selected and there is a valid BOM present

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 14 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (33b631e) 60.03% compared to head (49f8f91) 60.14%.
Report is 171 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head 49f8f91 differs from pull request most recent head cc0f4a9. Consider uploading reports for the commit cc0f4a9 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #38526      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    60.03%   60.14%   +0.11%     
===========================================
  Files          761      759       -2     
  Lines        70122    69508     -614     
===========================================
- Hits         42099    41808     -291     
+ Misses       28023    27700     -323     

Files	Coverage Δ
...uring/doctype/bom_creator_item/bom_creator_item.py	15.15% <0.00%> (-0.98%)	⬇️
...t/manufacturing/doctype/bom_creator/bom_creator.py	70.03% <45.45%> (-2.54%)	⬇️

... and 63 files with indirect coverage changes

[rohitwaghchaure]

@SvbZ3r0 Please add GIF or screenshots

[SvbZ3r0]

[SvbZ3r0]

Btw, what do you guys use for sreen captures?

[rohitwaghchaure]

@SvbZ3r0 Thanks for sharing the GIFs

My feedback is as follows

1. Use existing BOM :- Instead of this checkbox, you can add BOM field and on selection of the BOM fetch the raw materials from the respective BOM. Don't allow to change the raw materials or their quantities.
2. Qty edits on a node should propagate downwards: I think this should be configurable, what if user want to edit the qty of parent item bu don't want to propagate downwards?

[SvbZ3r0]

Thanks for the feedback.

1. That is how i want to do it too, but I don't know how. Is there some other place in the repo where something similar is done? Specifically, i want to know how to work with Dialog fields; adding event listeners, setting filters, refreshing the fields, etc.

2. I will do that. Any pointers on how to make it optional?

[SvbZ3r0]

choosebom.mp4

@rohitwaghchaure feedback implemented

[SvbZ3r0]

itemsfieldreadonly.mp4

itemsfieldreadonly2.mp4

[SvbZ3r0]

Hi @rohitwaghchaure ! Anything holding this up? I might be able to work on it some more during the holiday if needed.

[stale]

This pull request has been automatically marked as inactive because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed within 3 days if no further activity occurs, but it only takes a comment to keep a contribution alive :) Also, even if it is closed, you can always reopen the PR when you're ready. Thank you for contributing.

[SvbZ3r0]

Boop