CI: Put build-deb as its own job
#1013
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This duplicates the "build-deb" job, but make it possible to speed-up a bit more the CI runs, because we're not waiting for all the debian packages to build.
|
Sigh, that's a big chunk to copy. Could we turn this into a reusable workflow perhaps? If it's too much of a hassle, I'd be in favor of just waiting a bit more. After all, my guess is that waiting for CI actions will be less of a hassle once we implement merge queues. |
|
Interesting! Ultimately, I think the gain is not worth the effort for now. Closing this, we can reopen if we change our minds. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wanted to speed up a bit the CI runs by not waiting for all the debian packages to build.
It turns out the way to implement this requires us to duplicate the job definition, because the feature is not implemented in Github Actions.
What do you think @apyrgio?