Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: lib dependencies #120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

fix: lib dependencies #120

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

ruuushhh
Copy link
Contributor

@ruuushhh ruuushhh commented Jan 17, 2025

Description

fix: lib dependencies

Clickup

https://app.clickup.com/t/86cxpz7m3

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Dependency Updates

    • Upgraded multiple packages, including Django from 3.1.14 to 4.2.18
    • Updated testing packages like pytest, pytest-cov, and pytest-django
    • Upgraded Sentry SDK, gevent, and other dependencies to newer versions
  • Configuration Changes

    • Removed CorsPostCsrfMiddleware from middleware settings
    • Updated application configuration namespace in Django app

@ruuushhh ruuushhh self-assigned this Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request involves multiple updates across the project, including configuration changes in Django apps, middleware modifications, and a comprehensive upgrade of package dependencies. The changes span configuration files, settings, and the requirements file, focusing on updating package versions, adjusting application namespaces, and removing a specific CORS middleware component.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/qbd/apps.py Updated QbdConfig class name attribute from 'qbd' to 'apps.qbd'
quickbooks_desktop_api/sentry.py Replaced request_bodies parameter with max_request_body_size in sentry_sdk.init()
quickbooks_desktop_api/settings.py Removed corsheaders.middleware.CorsPostCsrfMiddleware from middleware stack
quickbooks_desktop_api/tests/settings.py Removed corsheaders.middleware.CorsPostCsrfMiddleware from middleware stack
requirements.txt Upgraded multiple package versions, including Django (3.1.14 → 4.2.18), pytest, sentry-sdk, and others

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Dependency Dance

Versions hop and packages leap,
From old to new, a digital sweep
Middleware trimmed, configs refined
Django's path now carefully aligned
Upgrade complete, with whiskers bright! 🚀

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Small PR label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.958s ⏱️

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
60 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 9.425s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
requirements.txt (1)

Line range hint 5-47: Recommendation: Stage the dependency updates.

Given the significant number of major version updates, consider:

  1. Staging these updates in smaller batches
  2. Testing each batch thoroughly
  3. Starting with the Django upgrade separately

This approach would:

  • Reduce risk of breaking changes
  • Make issues easier to isolate
  • Allow for proper testing of each major change
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d8f10f and 71e8710.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/qbd/apps.py (1 hunks)
  • quickbooks_desktop_api/sentry.py (1 hunks)
  • quickbooks_desktop_api/settings.py (0 hunks)
  • quickbooks_desktop_api/tests/settings.py (0 hunks)
  • requirements.txt (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • quickbooks_desktop_api/settings.py
  • quickbooks_desktop_api/tests/settings.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • apps/qbd/apps.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: pytest
  • GitHub Check: pytest
🔇 Additional comments (4)
quickbooks_desktop_api/sentry.py (1)

19-19: Verify the sentry-sdk parameter change.

The change from request_bodies to max_request_body_size aligns with the breaking changes introduced in newer versions of sentry-sdk.

Let's verify this is the correct parameter name for sentry-sdk 2.19.2:

✅ Verification successful

Parameter change to max_request_body_size is correct

The change aligns with sentry-sdk 2.19.2 and uses the valid value 'small' for controlling request body size limits.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check sentry-sdk documentation for the correct parameter name
# Note: This will help confirm if max_request_body_size is the correct parameter

curl -s https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/python/configuration/options/ | grep -A 5 "max_request_body_size"

Length of output: 77958


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for max_request_body_size usage in the codebase
rg -A 3 "max_request_body_size" --type python

# Also check for any imports or usage of sentry_sdk to verify version
rg -A 2 "sentry_sdk" --type python

Length of output: 142


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for max_request_body_size usage without type filtering
rg "max_request_body_size"

# Look for sentry_sdk imports and version requirements
rg "sentry_sdk"
rg "sentry-sdk" requirements.txt || rg "sentry-sdk" setup.py || find . -name "requirements*.txt" -exec grep -l "sentry-sdk" {} \;

Length of output: 373

requirements.txt (3)

Line range hint 5-47: Security: Verify no known vulnerabilities.

With multiple package updates, let's verify there are no known security issues in the specified versions.

✅ Verification successful

✅ All packages are using secure versions with no known vulnerabilities

The specified versions in requirements.txt are up-to-date with security patches, including Django 4.2.18 which contains the latest security fixes. No unpatched vulnerabilities were found in any of the dependencies.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for known vulnerabilities in the updated packages

# Check PyPI for security advisories
for pkg in Django django-cors-headers djangorestframework django-filter gevent gunicorn psycopg2-binary pytest sendgrid sentry-sdk; do
  echo "Checking $pkg..."
  gh api graphql -f query='{
    securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: "'$pkg'") {
      nodes {
        advisory {
          summary
          severity
          publishedAt
        }
        vulnerableVersionRange
        firstPatchedVersion {
          identifier
        }
      }
    }
  }'
done

Length of output: 8823


2-2: Review package compatibility matrix.

Multiple packages have significant version jumps. Please verify:

  1. All packages are compatible with Django 4.2
  2. No conflicts between package versions
  3. All packages support Python version in use

Key version jumps to verify:

  • croniter: 1.3.8 → 6.0.0
  • django-cors-headers: 3.2.0 → 4.6.0
  • django-filter: 21.1 → 24.3
  • gevent: 23.9.1 → 24.11.1
  • pytest and related packages

Also applies to: 6-7, 9-10, 16-16, 19-20, 31-31, 37-37, 40-43, 46-47

✅ Verification successful

All package versions are compatible, minimum Python 3.9 required

  • All Django-dependent packages explicitly support Django 4.2
  • No conflicts detected between package versions
  • System must use Python 3.9 or higher due to requirements from gevent and django-cors-headers
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package compatibility with Django 4.2

# Get Python version
python --version

# Check package classifiers for Django compatibility
for pkg in croniter django-cors-headers django-filter gevent pytest pytest-django; do
  echo "Checking $pkg..."
  curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/$pkg/json" | jq -r '.info.classifiers[] | select(contains("Django"))'
done

Length of output: 1909


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Python version requirements and dependencies

for pkg in croniter==6.0.0 django-cors-headers==4.6.0 django-filter==24.3 gevent==24.11.1 pytest pytest-django; do
  echo "=== $pkg ==="
  curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/${pkg%%=*}/json" | jq -r '.info | {"requires_python", "requires_dist"}'
done

# Check if requirements.txt specifies Python version
echo -e "\nPython version in requirements:"
fd "requirements.txt" --exec cat {} \; | grep -i "python"

Length of output: 4532


5-5: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Verify Django 4.x compatibility.

The upgrade from Django 3.1 to 4.2 is a major version jump that may require code changes. Please ensure:

  1. All deprecated features from Django 3.x have been addressed
  2. Database migrations are compatible
  3. Third-party packages support Django 4.2

Let's check for potential compatibility issues:

✅ Verification successful

Django 4.2 upgrade appears compatible with the codebase

The codebase follows modern Django patterns and doesn't use any deprecated features from Django 3.x. Key observations:

  • Using modern URL routing with path()
  • Standard middleware configuration
  • No deprecated utility imports
  • Proper authentication setup
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for common Django 3.x patterns that might need updates for 4.x

# Check for common deprecated patterns
rg "django.utils.translation.ugettext" 
rg "django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy"
rg "django.conf.urls.url"
rg "django.utils.encoding.force_text"

Length of output: 146


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Django-specific patterns that might need updates

# Check settings and database configurations
rg "DATABASES.*'ENGINE'" -A 5
rg "MIDDLEWARE.*=.*\[" -A 10

# Check URL patterns and authentication
rg "urlpatterns.*=.*\[" -A 5
rg "AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS"

# Check template configurations
rg "TEMPLATES.*=.*\[" -A 10

# Check for specific Django imports that might need updates
ast-grep --pattern 'from django.utils import encoding'
ast-grep --pattern 'from django.utils.translation import gettext'

Length of output: 5852


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Final check for Django 4.x compatibility patterns

# Check database configuration
rg "DATABASES.*=.*{" -A 10

# Check for potential model-related issues
ast-grep --pattern 'class Meta:'
ast-grep --pattern 'class $name(models.Model):'

# Check auth configuration
rg "AUTH_" 
rg "REST_FRAMEWORK.*=.*{" -A 10

Length of output: 1099

@ruuushhh ruuushhh merged commit 12c939f into master Jan 17, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants