Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add xcm benchmarking #995

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add xcm benchmarking #995

wants to merge 33 commits into from

Conversation

dmoka
Copy link
Contributor

@dmoka dmoka commented Jan 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

#989

TODO:

  • double check if everything is cheaper. If everything is chaper, we wait 2409, if not we are good to go
  • UI should test it out
  • regenerate benches on ref machine
  • fix integration tests

@dmoka dmoka linked an issue Jan 22, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Benchmark XCM weights in a better way #989
Open
@dmoka dmoka self-assigned this Jan 22, 2025
@dmoka dmoka marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 16:30
@dmoka dmoka marked this pull request as draft January 22, 2025 19:47
@dmoka dmoka marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2025 09:02
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Crate versions that have been updated:

  • runtime-integration-tests: v1.31.0 -> v1.31.1
  • hydradx-runtime: v282.0.0 -> v283.0.0

Runtime version has been increased.

@dmoka dmoka requested review from jak-pan and Roznovjak January 23, 2025 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jak-pan jak-pan Awaiting requested review from jak-pan

@Roznovjak Roznovjak Awaiting requested review from Roznovjak

Assignees

@dmoka dmoka

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Benchmark XCM weights in a better way
1 participant
@dmoka