Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensuring the integrity of full snapshot before uploading it to the object store. #779

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

ishan16696
Copy link
Member

@ishan16696 ishan16696 commented Sep 23, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:
It has been observed that while doing the restoration from full snapshot sometimes backup-restore failed to restore the etcd due to sometimes full snapshots got corrupted or missing a hash.
This PR is try to minimise the occurrence of such scenarios by verifying the integrity of full snapshot before uploading it to the object store.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #778

Special notes for your reviewer:
This is how it's done:

Screenshot 2024-09-23 at 10 10 45 AM

Release note:

Ensure the integrity of the full snapshot prior to uploading it to the object store, thereby reducing the potential restoration failures.

@ishan16696 ishan16696 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2024 07:25
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Sep 23, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 23, 2024
@ishan16696
Copy link
Member Author

ishan16696 commented Sep 23, 2024

Performance tests have been performed with etcd of 7GB database size:

~ > etcdctl endpoint status --endpoints=http://127.0.0.1:2379 --cluster -w table
+-----------------------+------------------+---------+---------+-----------+------------+-----------+------------+--------------------+--------+
|       ENDPOINT        |        ID        | VERSION | DB SIZE | IS LEADER | IS LEARNER | RAFT TERM | RAFT INDEX | RAFT APPLIED INDEX | ERRORS |
+-----------------------+------------------+---------+---------+-----------+------------+-----------+------------+--------------------+--------+
| http://localhost:2379 | 8e9e05c52164694d |   3.5.9 |  7.0 GB |      true |      false |         3 |      35952 |              35952 |        |
+-----------------------+------------------+---------+---------+-----------+------------+-----------+------------+--------------------+--------+

Backups taken by backup-restore with their sizes on disk.

25M	Full-00000000-02000001-1726772100.gz
79M	Full-00000000-05532798-1726864342.gz
140M	Full-00000000-09083821-1726946137.gz
185M	Full-00000000-11680572-1727038676.gz
200K	Incr-11680573-11691572-1727038777.gz
200K	Incr-11691573-11702572-1727038778.gz
200K	Incr-11702573-11712987-1727038807.gz
68K	Incr-11712988-11716517-1727068649.gz

Then a big full-snapshot is triggered by backup-restore:

INFO[0536] Taking scheduled full snapshot for time: 2024-09-23 11:00:00.014743 +0530 IST  actor=snapshotter
{"level":"info","ts":"2024-09-23T11:00:00.038+0530","caller":"clientv3/maintenance.go:200","msg":"opened snapshot stream; downloading"}
INFO[0536] Total time taken by Snapshot API: 0.002619 seconds.  actor=snapshotter
INFO[0536] checking the full snapshot integrity with the help of SHA256  actor=snapshotter
{"level":"info","ts":"2024-09-23T11:00:06.902+0530","caller":"clientv3/maintenance.go:208","msg":"completed snapshot read; closing"}
INFO[0547] full snapshot SHA256 hash has been successfully verified.  actor=snapshotter
INFO[0547] start compressing the snapshot using gzip Compression Policy  actor=compressor
INFO[0547] Total time taken in full snapshot compression: 0.001206 seconds.  actor=snapshotter
INFO[0547] Successfully opened snapshot reader on etcd   actor=snapshotter
INFO[0578] Total written bytes: 6982844448               actor=compressor
INFO[0578] Total time to save full snapshot: 41.202852 seconds.  actor=snapshotter
INFO[0578] Successfully saved full snapshot at: Full-00000000-11716517-1727069410.gz  actor=snapshotter
INFO[0578] Applied watch on etcd from revision: 11716518  actor=snapshotter

Then restoration is triggered:

INFO[0007] Received start initialization request.        actor=backup-restore-server
INFO[0007] Updating status from New to Progress          actor=backup-restore-server
INFO[0007] Setting status to : 503                       actor=backup-restore-server
INFO[0007] Validation failBelowRevision:                 actor=backup-restore-server
INFO[0007] Validation mode: full                         actor=backup-restore-server
INFO[0007] Checking for data directory structure validity...
INFO[0007] Data directory structure invalid.
INFO[0007] Finding latest set of snapshot to recover from...
INFO[0007] Removing directory(default.etcd.part).
INFO[0007] Restoring from base snapshot: Full-00000000-11716517-1727069410.gz  actor=restorer
INFO[0007] start decompressing the snapshot with gzip compressionPolicy  actor=de-compressor
INFO[0009] Responding to status request with: Progress   actor=backup-restore-server
{"level":"warn","ts":"2024-09-23T13:04:23.060+0530","caller":"clientv3/retry_interceptor.go:62","msg":"retrying of unary invoker failed","target":"passthrough:///http://localhost:2379","attempt":0,"error":"rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = latest balancer error: connection error: desc = \"transport: Error while dialing dial tcp [::1]:2379: connect: connection refused\""}
ERRO[0010] failed to get status of etcd endPoint: http://localhost:2379 with error: context deadline exceeded
INFO[0012] successfully fetched data of base snapshot in 4.938676375 seconds [CompressionPolicy:gzip]  actor=restorer
{"level":"warn","ts":"2024-09-23T13:04:27.060+0530","caller":"clientv3/retry_interceptor.go:62","msg":"retrying of unary invoker failed","target":"passthrough:///http://localhost:2379","attempt":0,"error":"rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = latest balancer error: connection error: desc = \"transport: Error while dialing dial tcp [::1]:2379: connect: connection refused\""}
ERRO[0014] failed to get status of etcd endPoint: http://localhost:2379 with error: context deadline exceeded
INFO[0016] Responding to status request with: Progress   actor=backup-restore-server
{"level":"warn","ts":"2024-09-23T13:04:31.061+0530","caller":"clientv3/retry_interceptor.go:62","msg":"retrying of unary invoker failed","target":"passthrough:///http://localhost:2379","attempt":0,"error":"rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = latest balancer error: connection error: desc = \"transport: Error while dialing dial tcp [::1]:2379: connect: connection refused\""}
ERRO[0018] failed to get status of etcd endPoint: http://localhost:2379 with error: context deadline exceeded
{"level":"info","ts":1727076872.963309,"caller":"membership/cluster.go:392","msg":"added member","cluster-id":"cdf818194e3a8c32","local-member-id":"0","added-peer-id":"8e9e05c52164694d","added-peer-peer-urls":["http://localhost:2380"]}
INFO[0020] No delta snapshots present over base snapshot.  actor=restorer
INFO[0020] Removing directory(default.etcd).
INFO[0020] Successfully restored the etcd data directory.
INFO[0020] Successfully initialized data directory for etcd.  actor=backup-restore-server
  • Full snapshot is successfully taken with integrity check. ✅
  • Successfully restored the etcd from the full snapshot. ✅
  • Snapshot-Compaction is also working as expected. ✅

@anveshreddy18
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@anveshreddy18 anveshreddy18 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @ishan16696.

PR looks good, I just have 2 small suggestions. PTAL

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@anveshreddy18 anveshreddy18 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested it and things are working good.
LGTM

@renormalize renormalize self-assigned this Sep 30, 2024
@seshachalam-yv
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao added this to the v0.31.0 milestone Oct 8, 2024
@anveshreddy18 anveshreddy18 removed their assignment Oct 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@renormalize renormalize left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this much needed PR @ishan16696!

Just a few comments from my side.

Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@renormalize renormalize left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another suggestion for better error handling, as discussed.

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Oct 17, 2024
Copy link
Member

@renormalize renormalize left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tiny nit, but otherwise the PR looks in great condition.
Thanks.

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Oct 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@renormalize renormalize left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ishan16696 for filling the gaps in my understanding in validation, and addressing all review comments!

@renormalize
Copy link
Member

@ishan16696 could you rebase your PR on master? This will fix the failing integration tests.
Thanks.

@renormalize renormalize removed their assignment Oct 18, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 29, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ishan16696 thank you so much for addressing my comments, and also for adding tests. I have one small concern regarding closure of ReadClosers, but other than that, looks good.

@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 29, 2025
@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao removed their assignment Jan 30, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 30, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ishan16696 thanks for making the requested change.
/lgtm

@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao removed their assignment Jan 30, 2025
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Jan 30, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@seshachalam-yv seshachalam-yv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for addressing my review comments
/lgtm

@seshachalam-yv seshachalam-yv removed their assignment Jan 30, 2025
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else and removed reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging labels Jan 30, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 30, 2025
@ishan16696 ishan16696 merged commit 4703c60 into gardener:master Jan 30, 2025
9 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Jan 30, 2025
@ishan16696 ishan16696 deleted the verifyFullSnapshot branch January 30, 2025 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else size/l Size of pull request is large (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
9 participants