Use same fct call for cwd and annmax #2
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fabern
force-pushed
the
use-same-fct-call-for-CWD-and-ANNMAX
branch
from
30922c4 to
6bfa25b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following the DRY principle ("don't repeat yourself") this pull request streamlines the code (and hopefully reduces code complexity). It does so by defining a single, generic function
apply_fct_to_each_file()for the operations that previously used a separatecwd_byLON()andcwd_annmax_byilon().Potentially this could also be used in the
grsofunpackage.The function
apply_fct_to_each_file()will need to be extended, once thecwd()function is further developed and needs to load two data.frames from.rds-files.