Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: serverlessInsight provider format refactor #23

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2024

Conversation

Blankll
Copy link
Member

@Blankll Blankll commented Dec 15, 2024

refactor: serverlessInsight provider format refactor

refactor the provider format,to support specify the region:

provider: aliyun

to

provider
    name: alialiyun
    region: cn-hangzhou

Refs: #5

@Blankll Blankll marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2024 14:02
@Blankll Blankll merged commit bba9248 into master Dec 15, 2024
2 checks passed
@Blankll Blankll deleted the refactor/provider-format branch December 15, 2024 14:03
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.47059% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.72%. Comparing base (d4cf33e) to head (d1b46f5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/common/actionContext.ts 50.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/stack/deploy.ts 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #23      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.67%   88.72%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines         415      417       +2     
  Branches       55       55              
==========================================
+ Hits          368      370       +2     
  Misses         31       31              
  Partials       16       16              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant