-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deepseek coder merge #5464
Closed
Closed
Deepseek coder merge #5464
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this ever used? And why this function duplicated below?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure. Looks like a convenient function for mapping if someone needs it in future convert-hf-to-gguf work. (The duplication is likely my fault, of course).
Should I get rid of it, comment it out? (Remember, I'm just merging their contributed deepcode/hf tokenizer code over mostly blindly -- although it does work. Resolves that out-of-range error too.) @ggerganov.
Let me know -- I'll also have to rebase and resubmit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just checked - it looks like ggerganov accidentally dropped this in
d24da31
(#4070). It's apparently used for forcing the model used via the command line? This will really be out-of-place after #5825, it should probably just be removed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see now - DeepseekCoderModel and DeepseekLLMModel can't be disambiguated from the model architecture alone. This should be changed so that they use a single class that derives tokenizer_model from either the model's config, or the command-line arguments if it really is a user choice.
It's honestly not clear to me why LlamaForCausalLM is referenced at all in convert-hf-to-gguf.py - convert.py is already capable of dealing with a llama model with a non-SPM tokenizer, and has superior memory management (so it's faster).