Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2024. It is now read-only.

fix py312 on osx #37

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

fix py312 on osx #37

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nilsnolde
Copy link
Member

it errored out with some old boost stuff, so I'll try to update it to 1.83.0, same as current upstream vcpkg

@nilsnolde
Copy link
Member Author

meeh, won't work with conan 1.x. this repo didn't switch yet to vcpkg.. I'll drop this for now, soon the bindings will be published from the upstream valhalla repo.

@thomthom
Copy link

thomthom commented May 2, 2024

New to this project. Trying to orient myself as it looks promising for a potential project. I was curious to try to build the project myself to learn more. Ran into the same issue with python 3.12 and started poking around in the issues.

meeh, won't work with conan 1.x. this repo didn't switch yet to vcpkg

There is a desire to migrate to vcpgk?

soon the bindings will be published from the upstream valhalla repo.

What are these bindings? Something this project used to provide that now will come from upstream?

@nilsnolde
Copy link
Member Author

What are these bindings?

this project 😄 it's python bindings to the c++ valhalla library..

the plan is to move the packaging to the upstream valhalla repo. that's the only thing this repo is really doing. I once had plans to do a few more things with it but so far I always ended up contributing enhancements back upstream. so there's no real need for an extra project and we can build & publish from valhalla repo. that'll take a while though, don't think I'll manage that in the next weeks.

@thomthom
Copy link

thomthom commented May 2, 2024

Ah, ok. Thank you for the insight. I'll keep an eye on the progress with that. I really liked the idea of using Valhalla directly from a language, like Python, instead of communicating back to a REST API server from the front end. And simplifying the distribution as you describe also sounds great.

So I take it that in terms of contributing back it's better to focus on Valhalla itself than this project?

@nilsnolde
Copy link
Member Author

So I take it that in terms of contributing back it's better to focus on Valhalla itself than this project?

yes for sure:)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants