-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use HDF5 files for quantity logs. #72
Conversation
I ran the complete workflow on Great Lakes. I didn't measure before/after timings, but the analysis step feels faster. The total output file size is also much smaller: 81M for 4 replicates. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes look mostly good. There is just one comment which appears to have been copy/pasted in each validation test file which is no longer true.
Description
Switch from GSD to HDF5 for thermodynamic logs.
Motivation and context
Reduce the time needed to run the analysis workflow steps.
How has this been tested?
Checklist:
CONTRIBUTORS.md
) in the pull request source branch.