Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ultra-supercritical power plant with boiler fireside and CO2 capture #69

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

nareshsusarla
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses issue:

This PR adds a simple fireside model for flue gas generation and a CO2 capture model for CCS to the existing ultra-supercritical power plant model.

Summary/Motivation:

This is work in progress and not ready for review yet.

Changes proposed in this PR:

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.md and COPYRIGHT.md file at the top level of this directory.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

@nareshsusarla nareshsusarla self-assigned this Sep 27, 2021
@nareshsusarla nareshsusarla added the Priority:Normal Medium Priority Issue or PR label Sep 27, 2021
@ksbeattie ksbeattie mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2021
23 tasks
@nareshsusarla nareshsusarla marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2021 02:23
@nareshsusarla nareshsusarla changed the title [WIP] Ultra-supercritical power plant with boiler fireside and CO2 capture Ultra-supercritical power plant with boiler fireside and CO2 capture Oct 7, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@Andresj89 Andresj89 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nareshsusarla nareshsusarla marked this pull request as draft October 25, 2021 16:38
@ksbeattie
Copy link
Contributor

@nareshsusarla says progress expected by next call (in 2 weeks)

@nareshsusarla
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is being closed as new PR #160 is opened replacing this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority:Normal Medium Priority Issue or PR
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants