Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: adding dashboard field to user data type #335

Conversation

claire1618
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@claire1618 claire1618 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2023 17:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #335 (02f7128) into feat/dashboard/library-db-types (4a867fb) will decrease coverage by 0.24%.
The diff coverage is 34.48%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                         Coverage Diff                         @@
##           feat/dashboard/library-db-types     #335      +/-   ##
===================================================================
- Coverage                            93.02%   92.79%   -0.24%     
===================================================================
  Files                                   65       65              
  Lines                                 7170     7199      +29     
===================================================================
+ Hits                                  6670     6680      +10     
- Misses                                 431      450      +19     
  Partials                                69       69              
Files Coverage Δ
database/user.go 88.00% <100.00%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
library/user.go 88.27% <29.62%> (-11.73%) ⬇️

@claire1618 claire1618 merged commit 4b9563c into feat/dashboard/library-db-types Dec 5, 2023
8 checks passed
@claire1618 claire1618 deleted the feat/dashboard/library-db-user-types branch December 5, 2023 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant