-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] Issue #122 / Add database/sql null type support #200
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
… more manageable - three new functions were created: resolveNodeID(), resolveNodeAttribute() and resolveNodeRelation()
….NullInt32 and sql.NullInt64 type
- sql.NullBool - sql.NullString - sql.NullFloat64 - sql.NullInt32 - sql.NullInt64
… the sql null type isn't valid
Hi @aren55555, I would like your opinion on the work done so far. Cheers! |
response.go
Outdated
case reflect.Uint64: | ||
node.ID = strconv.FormatUint(v.Interface().(uint64), 10) | ||
case reflect.Struct: | ||
if nStr, ok := v.Interface().(sql.NullString); ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other sql.Null*
types don't make sense for an ID, so we only consider: sql.NullString
, sql.NullInt32
and sql.NullInt64
.
node.Attributes[args[1]] = t.Unix() | ||
} | ||
} | ||
case reflect.TypeOf(sql.NullTime{}): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure how common the usage of *sql.NullTime
is (if that even makes sense), so for now I just added support for sql.NullTime
.
response.go
Outdated
|
||
if node.Relationships == nil { | ||
node.Relationships = make(map[string]interface{}) | ||
if nI32, ok := fieldValue.Interface().(sql.NullInt32); ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldn't find a DRY way to handle the repetitive checks sql.Null*
types require (omit attribute, return null
and return value).
node, err = resolveNodeID(node, fieldValue, fieldType) | ||
|
||
if err != nil { | ||
return nil, err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Returning early, instead of breaking and dealing with the error further down.
Please add tests that verify both the marshaling and unmarshalling behavior of these new types. |
…wn functions - unmarshallID() - unmarshallRelation()
…dleNumeric() function
…() function - implement isSQLNullType() and handleSQLNullType() functions
|
||
json.NewEncoder(buf).Encode(data.Relationships[args[1]]) | ||
json.NewDecoder(buf).Decode(relationship) | ||
func unmarshallID(node *Node, fieldValue reflect.Value, structField reflect.StructField) (*Node, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unmarshallID
isn't the greatest name, so I'm open to suggestions.
|
||
func unmarshallRelation(node *Node, fieldValue reflect.Value, included *map[string]*Node, args []string) (*Node, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here, feel free to suggest a better function name.
if data.Attributes["decimal"] != 3.0 { | ||
t.Fatalf("Error marshalling to sql.NullInt32") | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unlike in the previous test, I'm not checking the expected values of data.Attributes["fractional"]
and data.Attributes["computed_at"]
, since what we're getting doesn't make much sense to me.
I would expect data.Attributes["fractional"]
to be 1415926535897932
, yet we get 1.415926535897932e+15
.
The same goes for data.Attributes["computed_at"]
, where we get 1.615734e+09
instead of 1615734000
.
I'm not sure if this is expected, but it doesn't feel right. I also wonder if this is somehow related to #202, where we get a different float64
when converting values back.
TL;DR; I'm expecting different numeric types (int32
and int64
), but get float64
instead.
…re invalid and the omitted tag isn't set
…itempty is not set
Nice feature. Would be great if you merge it into the master. |
Yeah, but we need #206 merged first. Ping the repository owner if you have an interest. |
Description
This pull request addresses issue #122, which aims to add support for
database/sql
null types.I mainly want to start a discussion about the implementation, since there's definitely room for change/improvement.
Also, while pushing my changes, I realised from the TravisCI results that Go versions prior to 1.13 don't have support for
database/sql
null types. Would bumping the minimum Go version to 1.13 be a deal breaker?Task items:
visitModelNode()
function logic, to be more manageable/readable;resolveNodeID()
;sql.NullString
,sql.NullInt32
,sql.NullInt64
andsql.NullFloat64
resolveNodeAttribute()
;sql.NullTime
,sql.NullBool
,sql.NullString
,sql.NullFloat64
,sql.NullInt32
andsql.NullInt64
resolveNodeRelation()
;unmarshalNode()
function logic, to be more manageable/readable;unmarshallID()
;sql.NullString
,sql.NullInt32
,sql.NullInt64
andsql.NullFloat64
sql.NullTime
,sql.NullBool
,sql.NullString
,sql.NullFloat64
,sql.NullInt32
andsql.NullInt64
unmarshallRelation()
;