Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CVE-2024-21181 Plugin #570

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

leonardo-doyensec
Copy link
Collaborator

@leonardo-doyensec leonardo-doyensec commented Dec 13, 2024

Hello,
here it is the detector for Weblogic CVE-2024-21181. The issue is detected via a DNS callback, hence the Tsunami Callback Server needs to be set up in order to recieve a DNS query properly.

You can find the tesbed here google/security-testbeds#102


### Oracle Library

The plugin needs the `wlclient.jar` library from Oracle WebLogic to communicate with the Oracle WebLogic server, but since it's proprietary software we can't include it in the repo.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the jar still needed with the current implementation?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @maoning, yes it is still required for the detection to work. Without it, the plugin will still compile (as to not disrupt the setup process), but it will exit early with a warning during the detection phase asking the user to recompile it with the Oracle library. Note that the warning is only printed AFTER fingerprinting, if a target is actually confirmed to be Weblogic, so it won't appear during scans on unrelated software.

@lokiuox
Copy link
Collaborator

lokiuox commented Feb 5, 2025

Pushed a new version which does not use any Oracle libraries. The protocol was reverse-engineered and the network communications between the detector and the WebLogic server are all handled internally now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants