Ashley POC - Make typography size adjustments #3474
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
taysea
changed the title
|
Closing, font related work is being tested here: #4158 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Deploy Preview
What does this PR do?
This is a draft PR for Ashley so she can assess some typography sizing explorations she's working on in a wider set of examples from the site. She is exploring reducing the base text size from 18px/24px line-height to 16px/20px line height.
Where should the reviewer start?
What testing has been done on this PR?
In addition to the feature you are implementing, have you checked the following:
General UX Checks
Accessibility Checks
Code Quality Checks
How should this be manually tested?
Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant issues?
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Should this PR be mentioned in Design System updates?
Is this change backwards compatible or is it a breaking change?