Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Misc bugfixes; Support for reading EditionMappings.xml; Support for PID in setupp.ini #5

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hounsell
Copy link
Contributor

Some of my own misc fixes and improvements from over the past half year or so. I've not fully tested this merge yet, but it compiles OK so it's definitely ready to ship by MS standards.

Might yet bung a few other things in here.

  • Update ManagedWimLib to 2.4.0
  • Update copyright date
  • Add support for reading parent editions of virtual SKUs from EditionMappings.xml
  • Fix base SKU list for filename generation
  • Switch to OrdinalIgnoreCase - this is the recommended comparison for path names, it should also be slightly quicker.
  • Fix some errors thrown on real-world Windows ISOs
    • Where a WIM index doesn't contain a Windows install
    • No Base SKU available breaks renaming
    • Missing case insensitive comparison for install.wim name
  • Add support for detecting OEM / VLK from PID in setupp.ini in I386-style installs

…ID in setupp.ini

* Update ManagedWimLib to 2.4.0
* Update copyright date
* Add support for reading parent editions of virtual SKUs from EditionMappings.xml
* Fix base SKU list for filename generation
* Switch to OrdinalIgnoreCase - this is the recommended comparison for path names, it should also be slightly quicker.
* Fix some errors thrown on real-world Windows ISOs
  * Where a WIM index doesn't contain a Windows install
  * No Base SKU available breaks renaming
  * Missing case insensitive comparison for install.wim name
* Add support for detecting OEM / VLK from PID in setupp.ini in I386-style installs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant