-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Print peers count. #4719
Draft
Frozen
wants to merge
68
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feature/moved-tests-in-project-count-peers
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Print peers count. #4719
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…olang.org/protobuf. (#4636)
* add hardfork to make devnet external * add hardfork to make devnet external
* enable leader rotation and testnet external epochs
* bring back the lost maxRate epochs * fix epoch testnet
Update devnet internal vote power back to 90%
* Additional logs and cleanup. * Fixed tests.
Co-authored-by: Casey Gardiner <[email protected]>
* disable stream sync for partner network and other networks * remove unused tx in block manager * add log for staged sync creation * change bucket for stroring progress in staged stream sync, fix saveBlocks tx issue * refactor stream sync db initialization * set SnapshotLimit to zero for localnet * add new logs for stream request manager
… add new features to p2p (#4676)
* Fix for crosslink snap db. * Fix for possible race for new block post consensus job.
* Extracts `GetAddressForBLSKey` functionality from `Node` struct. * Fix for panic.
* Fixed crosslink sending. * Removed threshold 10 epochs. * Fix. * Fixed crosslink issue. * Additional error log.
* change muxer flag to string to support multiple muxers * fixed muxer usage description
Frozen
force-pushed
the
feature/moved-tests-in-project-count-peers
branch
from
July 23, 2024 16:51
19ff073
to
edceca8
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
Test
Unit Test Coverage
Before:
After:
Test/Run Logs
Operational Checklist
Does this PR introduce backward-incompatible changes to the on-disk data structure and/or the over-the-wire protocol?. (If no, skip to question 8.)
YES|NO
Describe the migration plan.. For each flag epoch, describe what changes take place at the flag epoch, the anticipated interactions between upgraded/non-upgraded nodes, and any special operational considerations for the migration.
Describe how the plan was tested.
How much minimum baking period after the last flag epoch should we allow on Pangaea before promotion onto mainnet?
What are the planned flag epoch numbers and their ETAs on Pangaea?
What are the planned flag epoch numbers and their ETAs on mainnet?
Note that this must be enough to cover baking period on Pangaea.
What should node operators know about this planned change?
Does this PR introduce backward-incompatible changes NOT related to on-disk data structure and/or over-the-wire protocol? (If no, continue to question 11.)
YES|NO
Does the existing
node.sh
continue to work with this change?What should node operators know about this change?
Does this PR introduce significant changes to the operational requirements of the node software, such as >20% increase in CPU, memory, and/or disk usage?
TODO