Add index entry for GHC-94803

message-index/messages/GHC-94803/example1/after/Example.hs

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+module Example where
+
+a = (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
+         0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,(0,0))

message-index/messages/GHC-94803/example1/before/Example.hs

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+module Example where
+
+a = (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
+         0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)

message-index/messages/GHC-94803/example1/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+title: 65-element tuples
+order: 1
+severity: error
+introduced: 9.8.1
+---
+
+Having too many elements in a tuple causes a compilation error. A workaround is to collect the extra elements in a nested tuple.

message-index/messages/GHC-94803/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+---
+title: Tuple too large
+summary: Tuples can only have up to 64 elements
+severity: error
+introduced: 9.8.1
+---
+
+A value containing more than 64 elements needs to be represented in a different way.
+
+## Example error text
+```
+error: [GHC-94803]
+    • A 65-tuple is too large for GHC
+        (max size is 64)
+        Workaround: use nested tuples or define a data type
+    • In the expression:
+        (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+         0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+         0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
+      In an equation for ‘a’:
+          a = (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+               0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+               0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+               0)
+```