Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Warn user about duplicate processor names - #41 implementation #42

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2018
Merged

Warn user about duplicate processor names - #41 implementation #42

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2018

Conversation

luzhanov
Copy link

Proposed solution for issue: #41

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #42 into master will increase coverage by 0.41%.
The diff coverage is 83.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #42      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.36%   58.78%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines         968      985      +17     
  Branches      175      179       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          565      579      +14     
- Misses        342      343       +1     
- Partials       61       63       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...va/com/github/hermannpencole/nifi/config/Main.java 85.29% <100%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
...e/nifi/config/service/ExtractProcessorService.java 89.87% <81.25%> (-2.2%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 797efa1...db353df. Read the comment docs.

@hermannpencole hermannpencole merged commit fa67f1b into hermannpencole:master Mar 1, 2018
@luzhanov luzhanov deleted the duplicate_names_check branch March 8, 2018 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants