-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HP-1751 Create configurations for billing types #530
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
HP-1751 Create configurations for billing types #530
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new dependency to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
config/web.php (1)
293-295
: Consider making the registry configuration more flexibleThe current implementation uses a static factory method which might make testing harder and lacks configuration options. Consider:
- Making the registry configuration injectable for better testability
- Adding configuration parameters if needed for different environments
Example approach:
\hiqdev\php\billing\product\BillingRegistryInterface::class => static function () { - return \hiqdev\billing\registry\TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); + return \hiqdev\billing\registry\TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry([ + 'config' => $params['billing.registry'] ?? [], + ]); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
config/web.php
(1 hunks)src/logic/bill/QuantityFormatterFactory.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/logic/bill/QuantityFormatterFactory.php (1)
67-71
: Clarify the intended usage of BillingRegistryInterface
The BillingRegistryInterface
has been added as a dependency but isn't utilized in any of the class methods. This seems like an incomplete change. Could you please:
- Clarify how the billing registry will be used in this class
- Consider adding a TODO comment if this is preparatory work for future changes
Let's check if there are any related TODO comments or upcoming changes:
✅ Verification successful
The BillingRegistryInterface dependency appears to be properly configured
The verification shows that:
- BillingRegistryInterface is properly configured in the DI container (config/web.php) and mapped to a concrete implementation
- The class is part of a billing system handling various quantity formatting for different billing types
- The dependency injection is consistent with the system's architecture where billing registry is used for tariff configuration
The addition of BillingRegistryInterface as a dependency is valid and follows the application's design patterns, even if not immediately used in the current implementation. This is a common practice when preparing for upcoming features while maintaining proper dependency injection.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for related TODO comments or upcoming changes
rg -l "TODO.*[Bb]illing"
Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if BillingRegistryInterface is used anywhere in the class
rg -A 5 "BillingRegistry" src/logic/bill/QuantityFormatterFactory.php
# Let's also check for any recent changes or additions related to BillingRegistry
rg -l "BillingRegistryInterface"
# Let's look at the actual implementation to understand the context better
ast-grep --pattern 'class QuantityFormatterFactory {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how BillingRegistryInterface is configured in web.php
cat config/web.php
# Let's check the full implementation of QuantityFormatterFactory to see all methods
rg -A 20 "class QuantityFormatterFactory" src/logic/bill/QuantityFormatterFactory.php
# Let's also check if there are any recent changes or PRs related to billing
rg -l "[Bb]illing" --type php
Length of output: 16191
config/web.php (1)
293-295
: Review package version constraint
Using dev-master
for advancedhosters/billing-registry
in production could lead to stability issues. Consider:
- Using a stable version constraint
- Adding a minimum stability requirement if needed
Let's check the package's available versions:
public function __construct( | ||
private readonly IntlFormatter $intlFormatter, | ||
private readonly BillTypesProvider $billTypesProvider, | ||
private readonly BillingRegistryInterface $BillingRegistry, | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
After reviewing the complete class implementation, I can now generate the final response:
Property naming issue confirmed and unused dependency detected
- The property
$BillingRegistry
violates PSR naming conventions and should be renamed to$billingRegistry
- The
BillingRegistryInterface
dependency is injected but never used in any of the class methods:create()
,forBill()
,forCharge()
,forConsumption()
,createByType()
, orfixType()
This appears to be an incomplete implementation. Either:
- Remove the unused dependency if it's not needed
- Or implement the intended functionality that requires this dependency
🔗 Analysis chain
Property naming and unused dependency concerns
- The property name
$BillingRegistry
should follow PSR naming conventions and be in camelCase:$billingRegistry
- The injected
BillingRegistryInterface
is never used in any of the class methods
Apply this diff to fix the property naming:
public function __construct(
private readonly IntlFormatter $intlFormatter,
private readonly BillTypesProvider $billTypesProvider,
- private readonly BillingRegistryInterface $BillingRegistry,
+ private readonly BillingRegistryInterface $billingRegistry,
)
Let's verify the usage of BillingRegistryInterface in this class:
Let me gather more context about this class to ensure a comprehensive verification.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if BillingRegistryInterface is used in the class methods
rg -U "billingRegistry|BillingRegistry" src/logic/bill/QuantityFormatterFactory.php
Length of output: 153
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the class to understand its methods and usage
cat src/logic/bill/QuantityFormatterFactory.php
Length of output: 5817
…emented in Registry
… to use Billing Registry
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (1)
162-174
: Add defensive programming measuresWhile the new implementation using BillingRegistry behaviors is good, consider adding defensive programming measures:
- Add validation for behavior responses
- Handle the case when no behaviors are found
- Add error handling for invalid behavior data
Consider applying this improvement:
public function getConfigurations(): array { $configurations = []; /** @var ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour $behavior */ + $behaviors = $this->billingRegistry->getBehaviors(ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour::class); + if (empty($behaviors)) { + Yii::warning('No consumption configuration behaviors found'); + } - foreach ($this->billingRegistry->getBehaviors(ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour::class) as $behavior) { + foreach ($behaviors as $behavior) { $tariffType = $behavior->getTariffType(); + if ($tariffType === null) { + Yii::warning('Invalid tariff type returned by behavior'); + continue; + } $configurations[$tariffType->name()] = [ - 'label' => $behavior->getLabel(), + 'label' => $behavior->getLabel() ?? ['hipanel:finance', 'Unknown'], 'columns' => $behavior->columns, 'groups' => $behavior->groups, 'model' => $this->createObject($behavior->getModel() ?? Target::class), 'resourceModel' => $this->createObject($behavior->getResourceModel() ?? TargetResource::class), ]; } return $configurations; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (3)
12-13
: LGTM: Clean dependency injection implementation
The new imports and constructor properly implement dependency injection for the BillingRegistry, with good use of PHP 8 features like constructor property promotion and readonly properties.
Also applies to: 21-23
153-154
: LGTM: Improved object creation pattern
Good improvement using createObject
for dependency injection instead of direct instantiation. This makes the code more testable and flexible.
30-30
: Verify no external usage of previously public methods
The visibility changes to getGroups
and getDecorator
improve encapsulation. However, since these were previously public, we should verify there are no external dependencies on these methods.
Also applies to: 106-106
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to search for these method calls.
Let me check if the getGroups
method found in other files is related to our class.
Visibility changes to getGroups
and getDecorator
are safe
The search results confirm that:
- The
getGroups
method found in other files (FormulaExamplesProvider
andformulaHelpModal
) is a different implementation, not related toConsumptionConfigurator
- All calls to
getGroups
andgetDecorator
inConsumptionConfigurator
are internal to the class - No external usage of these methods from
ConsumptionConfigurator
was found
Therefore, changing the visibility of these methods to private is safe and improves encapsulation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any external usage of these methods
echo "Searching for external usage of getGroups and getDecorator methods..."
rg -l "->getGroups\(" --type php
rg -l "->getDecorator\(" --type php
Length of output: 1031
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for method calls using escaped characters and word boundaries
echo "Searching for external usage of getGroups..."
rg "\bgetGroups\(" --type php
echo -e "\nSearching for external usage of getDecorator..."
rg "\bgetDecorator\(" --type php
Length of output: 998
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around getGroups usage
echo "Context for getGroups in formulaHelpModal.php:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "getGroups\(" src/widgets/views/formulaHelpModal.php
echo -e "\nContext for getGroups in FormulaExamplesProvider.php:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "getGroups\(" src/providers/FormulaExamplesProvider.php
echo -e "\nChecking if these files import ConsumptionConfigurator:"
rg -l "ConsumptionConfigurator" src/widgets/views/formulaHelpModal.php src/providers/FormulaExamplesProvider.php
Length of output: 993
…rFactory, TargetResourceDecoratorFactory and ClientResourceDecoratorFactory classes because ResourceDecoratorFactory in enough
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (1)
22-35
: Consider inverting this dependency for improved testability and flexibility.
Building the registry inline is convenient, but injecting it as a dependency simplifies mocking and unit testing in the future.src/models/HasDecorator.php (1)
10-11
: Consider declaring a default value for the private property.
You might consider initializing$decorator
withnull
to be explicit and avoid potential uninitialized property errors if PHP initialization rules change in the future.- private ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator; + private ?ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator = null;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
src/models/ClientResource.php
(1 hunks)src/models/HasDecorator.php
(1 hunks)src/models/ServerResource.php
(1 hunks)src/models/TargetResource.php
(1 hunks)src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(2 hunks)src/models/decorators/client/ClientResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/ServerResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/TargetResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(0 hunks)src/models/stubs/ServerResourceStub.php
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- src/models/decorators/target/TargetResourceDecoratorFactory.php
- src/models/decorators/server/ServerResourceDecoratorFactory.php
- src/models/decorators/client/ClientResourceDecoratorFactory.php
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (2)
1-1
: Great job introducing strict typing.
This enhances type safety and helps identify potential type-related issues at compile time.
5-7
: Confirm that newly imported classes are fully utilized.
These imports look appropriate, but please ensure they are all used in the implementations.
✅ Verification successful
All imported classes are properly utilized in the implementation
The verification shows that all imported classes are actively used within the ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
:
TariffConfiguration
is used to build the registry:TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry()
ResourceDecoratorBehavior
is used in type hint and class reference:@var ResourceDecoratorBehavior
andResourceDecoratorBehavior::class
ResourceDecoratorData
is instantiated:new ResourceDecoratorData(
BehaviorNotFoundException
is used in catch block:catch (BehaviorNotFoundException)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify references to newly added imports:
rg "ResourceDecoratorBehavior|ResourceDecoratorData|TariffConfiguration|BehaviorNotFoundException"
Length of output: 1226
src/models/ServerResource.php (1)
28-28
: Using the HasDecorator
trait centralizes and simplifies the decorator logic.
This approach enhances maintainability across multiple resource classes.
src/models/TargetResource.php (2)
1-1
: Enabling strict typing is a solid choice.
It helps maintain consistent and correct type usage throughout the file.
9-9
: The trait-based approach simplifies decorator handling.
Refactoring for a single, shared decorator logic approach is a good architectural improvement.
src/models/ClientResource.php (2)
1-1
: Strict typing fosters safer code.
Thank you for maintaining a consistent coding standard across files.
9-9
: Strongly aligned with the new decorator pattern approach.
Using HasDecorator
eliminates boilerplate code in each resource class.
src/models/stubs/ServerResourceStub.php (2)
13-13
: The addition of the HasDecorator
trait unifies the stub with the updated resource structure.
This helps ensure test stubs remain aligned with the actual resource implementations.
17-17
: Eliminating the manual decorator
method removes extraneous duplication.
Consolidating the decorator logic in one trait simplifies future maintenance.
src/models/HasDecorator.php (3)
1-1
: Great use of strict typing.
Declaring strict_types=1
enforces type safety and is a recommended practice in modern PHP development.
8-9
: Well-structured trait introduction.
Using a trait like HasDecorator
encourages code reuse and keeps the classes that include it focused on their core responsibilities.
12-19
: Lazy-loading approach looks clean and maintainable.
The decorator()
method neatly defers the instantiation until it’s needed, reducing overhead if the resource decorator is never accessed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (2)
147-156
: Consider extracting the fallback configuration to a constant or private method.The fallback configuration could be extracted to improve maintainability and reusability.
Here's a suggested refactor:
+ private function getDefaultConfiguration(): array + { + return [ + 'label' => ['hipanel:finance', $class], + 'columns' => [], + 'groups' => [], + 'model' => $this->createObject(Target::class), + 'resourceModel' => $this->createObject(TargetResource::class), + ]; + } + public function getConfigurationByClass(string $class): array { - $fallback = [ - 'label' => ['hipanel:finance', $class], - 'columns' => [], - 'groups' => [], - 'model' => $this->createObject(Target::class), - 'resourceModel' => $this->createObject(TargetResource::class), - ]; - - return $this->getConfigurations()[$class] ?? $fallback; + return $this->getConfigurations()[$class] ?? $this->getDefaultConfiguration(); }
161-176
: Consider adding error handling for invalid behavior configurations.While the implementation is good, it could benefit from validation and error handling for cases where behavior methods return invalid or unexpected values.
Here's a suggested improvement:
public function getConfigurations(): array { $configurations = []; /** @var ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour $behavior */ foreach ($this->billingRegistry->getBehaviors(ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour::class) as $behavior) { $tariffType = $behavior->getTariffType(); + if ($tariffType === null) { + continue; // or throw new InvalidConfigurationException + } $configurations[$tariffType->name()] = [ - 'label' => $behavior->getLabel(), - 'columns' => $behavior->columns, - 'groups' => $behavior->groups, + 'label' => $behavior->getLabel() ?? ['hipanel:finance', 'Unknown'], + 'columns' => $behavior->columns ?? [], + 'groups' => $behavior->groups ?? [], 'model' => $this->createObject($behavior->getModel() ?? Target::class), 'resourceModel' => $this->createObject($behavior->getResourceModel() ?? TargetResource::class), ]; } return $configurations; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (2)
12-13
: LGTM! Well-structured dependency injection implementation.
The addition of BillingRegistryInterface as a constructor dependency with proper readonly property promotion follows good practices for dependency injection and immutability.
Also applies to: 21-23
30-30
: LGTM! Improved encapsulation through visibility restrictions.
Changing the visibility of getGroups
and getDecorator
to private properly encapsulates these implementation details.
Let's verify there are no external calls to these methods:
Also applies to: 106-106
✅ Verification successful
Visibility changes are safe to apply
The external call to getGroups()
found in formulaHelpModal.php
is actually calling a different method from a formulaExamplesProvider
instance, not the ConsumptionConfigurator::getGroups()
method being modified. All other calls to both getGroups()
and getDecorator()
are internal to the ConsumptionConfigurator
class itself, so changing their visibility to private is safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any external calls to these methods that might break due to visibility changes
rg -l "->getGroups\s*\(" --type php
rg -l "->getDecorator\s*\(" --type php
Length of output: 888
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any external calls to these methods that might break due to visibility changes
# Escape the special characters in the pattern
rg "\->getGroups\(" --type php
rg "\->getDecorator\(" --type php
Length of output: 492
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of the external call to getGroups in formulaHelpModal.php
# to see if it's calling the same method or a different one
rg -B 2 -A 2 "\->getGroups\(" src/widgets/views/formulaHelpModal.php
# Also check what class is $widget in formulaHelpModal.php
rg -B 5 "widget" src/widgets/views/formulaHelpModal.php
Length of output: 968
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/models/stubs/AbstractResourceStub.php (1)
14-14
: Consider documenting the new interface usage.
It might be helpful to document how and why this interface is being used, especially if future contributors need to understand its relationship to the rest of the codebase.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
src/models/ClientResource.php
(1 hunks)src/models/HasDecorator.php
(1 hunks)src/models/Resource.php
(0 hunks)src/models/ServerResource.php
(2 hunks)src/models/TargetResource.php
(1 hunks)src/models/decorators/DecoratedInterface.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(1 hunks)src/models/proxy/Resource.php
(1 hunks)src/models/stubs/AbstractResourceStub.php
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/models/Resource.php
- src/models/decorators/DecoratedInterface.php
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/models/proxy/Resource.php
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/models/HasDecorator.php
- src/models/TargetResource.php
- src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/models/ClientResource.php (2)
1-1
: LGTM! Good practice adding strict types.
Adding strict type declarations helps catch type-related errors at compile time rather than runtime.
5-9
: Verify the HasDecorator trait implementation.
The change from direct decorator implementation to using the HasDecorator
trait looks good and follows DRY principles. However, let's verify the trait implementation and its usage across other resource classes.
✅ Verification successful
HasDecorator trait implementation is consistent and properly used
The verification shows that:
- The
HasDecorator
trait is well-implemented with proper decorator initialization and caching logic - It's consistently used across all resource classes: ClientResource, TargetResource, ServerResource (and its stub)
- No direct decorator() method implementations remain in the codebase, confirming complete migration to the trait
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the HasDecorator trait implementation and usage
# Check the HasDecorator trait implementation
echo "Checking HasDecorator trait implementation:"
rg -A 10 "trait HasDecorator"
# Check other classes using the HasDecorator trait
echo -e "\nChecking HasDecorator trait usage:"
rg "use HasDecorator"
# Verify no remaining direct decorator() method implementations
echo -e "\nChecking for any remaining direct decorator() implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'function decorator()'
Length of output: 1254
src/models/ServerResource.php (2)
14-14
: LGTM! Import statement aligns with interface implementation.
The addition of the DecoratedInterface
import is consistent with the class's implementation of this interface.
28-28
: LGTM! Trait usage improves code organization.
The addition of the HasDecorator
trait is a good refactoring that:
- Standardizes decorator handling across resource classes
- Removes duplicated decorator initialization code
- Improves maintainability
Let's verify consistent implementation across related resource classes:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern since the previous one didn't work correctly.
Let me check the trait implementation to ensure it properly supports the interface.
Trait implementation is consistent and properly supports decorator pattern
Based on the verification:
HasDecorator
trait is used consistently inServerResource
,TargetResource
, andClientResource
- These classes correctly implement
DecoratedInterface
- The trait provides proper implementation with lazy loading of decorators via factory
CertificateResource
andDomainResource
don't use decorators, which is fine as they might not need this functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent implementation of HasDecorator trait
# across all resource classes
# Check for HasDecorator trait usage
echo "Checking HasDecorator trait usage in resource classes:"
rg -l "use HasDecorator;" "src/models/*Resource.php"
# Check for DecoratedInterface implementation
echo -e "\nChecking DecoratedInterface implementation in resource classes:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $NAME extends Resource implements DecoratedInterface'
Length of output: 463
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First find all resource files
echo "Finding all resource files:"
fd "Resource\.php$" src/
# Check HasDecorator usage
echo -e "\nChecking HasDecorator trait usage:"
rg "use HasDecorator;" $(fd "Resource\.php$" src/)
# Check DecoratedInterface implementation
echo -e "\nChecking DecoratedInterface implementation:"
rg "implements.*DecoratedInterface" $(fd "Resource\.php$" src/)
# Look at the trait definition
echo -e "\nLooking for HasDecorator trait definition:"
fd "HasDecorator.php" src/
Length of output: 1720
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the HasDecorator trait implementation
echo "HasDecorator trait implementation:"
cat src/models/HasDecorator.php
# Check if there are any decorator-related methods in Resource classes that don't use the trait
echo -e "\nChecking for decorator methods in other resources:"
rg "decorator|getDecorator|setDecorator" src/models/CertificateResource.php src/models/DomainResource.php
Length of output: 873
src/models/stubs/AbstractResourceStub.php (1)
17-17
: Verify that all interface requirements are fulfilled.
This class now implements DecoratedInterface
. Confirm whether additional methods or traits are needed for full compliance, or if the interface acts purely as a marker with no required methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (1)
162-174
: Add error handling for invalid behaviors.While the new implementation is more dynamic and extensible, it lacks error handling for invalid behaviors. Consider adding validation and error handling for cases where:
- Behavior doesn't implement required methods
- Invalid model classes are specified
- Required configuration values are missing
Here's a suggested improvement:
public function getConfigurations(): array { $configurations = []; /** @var ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour $behavior */ foreach ($this->billingRegistry->getBehaviors(ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour::class) as $behavior) { + try { $tariffType = $behavior->getTariffType(); + if (!method_exists($behavior, 'getLabel') || !method_exists($behavior, 'getModel')) { + throw new \RuntimeException("Behavior must implement getLabel() and getModel() methods"); + } $configurations[$tariffType->name()] = [ 'label' => $behavior->getLabel(), 'columns' => $behavior->columns, 'groups' => $behavior->groups, 'model' => $this->createObject($behavior->getModel() ?? Target::class), 'resourceModel' => $this->createObject($behavior->getResourceModel() ?? TargetResource::class), ]; + } catch (\Throwable $e) { + Yii::warning("Failed to load configuration from behavior: " . $e->getMessage()); + continue; + } } return $configurations; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (3)
11-13
: LGTM! Well-structured dependency injection.
The constructor properly implements dependency injection using PHP 8's readonly property promotion, making the dependency on BillingRegistryInterface
explicit and immutable.
Also applies to: 21-23
153-154
: LGTM! Improved object instantiation pattern.
The change to use createObject
method leverages Yii's dependency injection container, making the code more flexible and testable.
30-30
: Verify impact of method visibility changes.
The following methods have changed visibility which could break existing code:
getGroups
: public → privategetDecorator
: public → privategetConfigurationByClass
: private → public
Let's verify the usage of these methods:
Also applies to: 106-106, 147-147
✅ Verification successful
Method visibility changes are safe to proceed
Based on the codebase analysis:
getGroups()
: The only external usage found is fromFormulaExamplesProvider
which is a different class with its own implementation. The usage inConsumptionConfigurator
is internal (self calls).getDecorator()
: All usages are internal withinConsumptionConfigurator
class itself.getConfigurationByClass()
: All usages are withinConsumptionConfigurator
class, and making it public actually improves accessibility where needed.
The visibility changes are safe as they don't break any existing code:
- The methods that became private (
getGroups
,getDecorator
) are only used internally - The method that became public (
getConfigurationByClass
) maintains backward compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of these methods in the codebase
echo "Searching for getGroups() usage..."
rg "->getGroups\(" --type php
echo "Searching for getDecorator() usage..."
rg "->getDecorator\(" --type php
echo "Searching for getConfigurationByClass() usage..."
rg "->getConfigurationByClass\(" --type php
Length of output: 1598
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of these methods in the codebase
echo "Searching for getGroups() usage..."
rg -e "getGroups\(" --type php
echo "Searching for getDecorator() usage..."
rg -e "getDecorator\(" --type php
echo "Searching for getConfigurationByClass() usage..."
rg -e "getConfigurationByClass\(" --type php
# Let's also check the class usage to understand the context better
echo "Searching for ConsumptionConfigurator usage..."
rg -e "ConsumptionConfigurator" --type php
Length of output: 4402
…urce() method to understand what parameter types can be passed to the function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (2)
25-25
: Consider caching the registry instance.Building the registry on every method call (
TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry()
) could impact performance. Consider caching the registry instance or making it a singleton.+ private static ?object $registry = null; public static function createFromResource($resource): ResourceDecoratorInterface { $type = $resource->model_type ?? $resource->type; - $registry = TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); + self::$registry ??= TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry();
38-40
: Enhance error handling with more descriptive messages.The current error message could be more helpful by including:
- The available behavior types from the registry
- The actual reason for the behavior not being found
- } catch (BehaviorNotFoundException) { - throw new InvalidConfigException('No representative decoration class found for type "' . $type . '"'); + } catch (BehaviorNotFoundException $e) { + throw new InvalidConfigException(sprintf( + 'No representative decoration class found for type "%s". Available types: [%s]. Reason: %s', + $type, + implode(', ', $registry->getAvailableTypes()), + $e->getMessage() + )); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (3)
1-11
: LGTM! Good practices in type safety and imports.
The addition of strict types and well-organized imports from the billing registry package enhance code reliability and maintainability.
14-24
: LGTM! Well-documented method signature.
The PHPDoc block properly documents the parameter types, return type, and possible exceptions.
25-37
: Verify the registry behavior types are properly configured.
The new registry-based approach requires proper configuration of behavior types. Let's verify the configuration:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
config/web.php (1)
199-199
: Remove commented-out code.The commented-out singleton definition for
ConsumptionConfigurator
should be removed as it's no longer needed.-// \hipanel\modules\finance\helpers\ConsumptionConfigurator::class => \hipanel\modules\finance\helpers\ConsumptionConfigurator::class,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
config/web.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
config/web.php (2)
200-202
: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.
The switch to BillingRegistryInterface
with a factory method is a solid improvement that:
- Follows dependency injection principles
- Provides better abstraction through interface usage
- Enables easier testing and maintenance
200-202
: Verify the registry configuration.
Please ensure that the TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry()
is properly configured with all required billing types and behaviors.
… added in Billing Registry
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (1)
177-188
: Address TODOs and document the special caseThe code contains:
- TODO comments about missing traffic types in the database
- A hardcoded 'tariff' configuration that "Can't be added to Billing Registry"
Consider:
- Creating tickets to track the missing traffic types investigation
- Adding more detailed documentation explaining why the 'tariff' configuration can't be added to the registry
Would you like me to help create GitHub issues to track these TODOs?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (4)
11-14
: LGTM! Good use of dependency injection
The constructor properly implements dependency injection using the BillingRegistryInterface
, following SOLID principles. The use of PHP 8's readonly property promotion is a nice touch for immutability.
Also applies to: 22-24
163-175
: LGTM! Good refactoring to dynamic configuration
The refactoring to use BillingRegistry
behaviors for configuration retrieval is a good improvement that makes the system more maintainable and extensible.
154-155
: LGTM! Good use of factory method pattern
The consistent use of createObject
for model instantiation is a good practice that:
- Leverages Yii's dependency injection container
- Makes object creation more maintainable and testable
- Provides a single point of control for object instantiation
Also applies to: 172-173
31-31
: Verify the impact of method visibility changes
The visibility changes improve encapsulation but might break existing code. Please ensure:
- No external code directly calls
getGroups
orgetDecorator
- All code requiring configuration access uses the now-public
getConfigurationByClass
Also applies to: 107-107, 148-148
✅ Verification successful
Method visibility changes are safe to apply
The visibility changes to getGroups
and getDecorator
methods in ConsumptionConfigurator
are safe because:
getGroups
is only used internally by the publicgetGroupsWithLabels
method, which serves as the proper public interface- No external code directly calls these methods
- The
FormulaExamplesProvider::getGroups()
is a different method in a different class - The
Consumption::getGroupsWithLabels()
properly uses the public interface
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct calls to getGroups and getDecorator
echo "Searching for potential breaking changes..."
rg --type php "->getGroups\(|->getDecorator\(" --glob '!src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php'
Length of output: 600
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential calls to getGroups and getDecorator methods
echo "Searching for potential breaking changes..."
rg -t php "getGroups|getDecorator" --glob '!src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php'
# Let's also check if there are any class references to ConsumptionConfigurator
echo -e "\nSearching for ConsumptionConfigurator usage..."
rg -t php "ConsumptionConfigurator" --glob '!src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php'
# Check the class definition and its inheritance
echo -e "\nChecking class definition..."
rg -t php "class ConsumptionConfigurator" -A 5
Length of output: 3607
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of getGroups and getDecorator in the found files
echo "Checking getGroups usage in Consumption model..."
rg -t php "getGroups" src/models/Consumption.php -B 2 -A 2
echo -e "\nChecking getGroupsWithLabels implementation..."
rg -t php "getGroupsWithLabels" src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php -B 2 -A 5
echo -e "\nChecking FormulaExamplesProvider getGroups implementation..."
rg -t php "getGroups" src/providers/FormulaExamplesProvider.php -B 2 -A 5
Length of output: 1502
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (1)
22-22
: Leverage shared conversion logic from the external billing registry.By delegating the conversion to
\hiqdev\billing\registry\helper\ResourceHelper::convertAmount
, you ensure consistent conversion rules. However, consider adding error handling or validating the response from the external helper in case of unexpected inputs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (50)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php
(2 hunks)src/models/decorators/AbstractResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorInterface.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/client/AbstractClientResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/client/ReferralResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/AbstractServerResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/BackupResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/ChassisResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/CpuResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/HALoadBalancerResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/HddResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/IpResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/Isp5ResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/IspResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/LoadBalancerResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/LocationResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/MonthlyResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/PanelResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/PowerResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/RackUnitResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/RamResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/ServerDUResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/ServerFilesResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/ServerSSDResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/ServerSataDUResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/SpeedResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/StorageDUResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/SupportResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/Traffic95ResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/server/TrafficResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/AbstractTargetResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnCache95ResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnCacheResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnTraffic95MaxResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnTraffic95ResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficMaxResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficPlainResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficSSLResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/IpAnycastResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/IpPublicResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/IpRegularResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/PrivateCloudBackupDuResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/SnapshotDuResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/StorageDu95ResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/StorageDuResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/VolumeDuResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/VpsTrafficInResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/VpsTrafficMaxResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)src/models/decorators/target/VpsTrafficResourceDecorator.php
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (49)
- src/models/decorators/server/RackUnitResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnCacheResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/ServerDUResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/TrafficResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/VpsTrafficMaxResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnTraffic95MaxResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficSSLResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/LoadBalancerResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/StorageDu95ResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/VpsTrafficInResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/Isp5ResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/ServerSSDResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/IpAnycastResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/IpResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/VolumeDuResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/MonthlyResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/IpRegularResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/BackupResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/Traffic95ResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/StorageDUResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficMaxResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnTrafficPlainResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/SupportResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnTraffic95ResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/StorageDuResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/CdnCache95ResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/AbstractResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/HddResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/RamResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/AbstractTargetResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/SnapshotDuResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/IspResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/client/AbstractClientResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/CpuResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/ServerSataDUResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/SpeedResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorInterface.php
- src/models/decorators/server/PowerResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/LocationResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/ChassisResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/IpPublicResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/HALoadBalancerResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/VpsTrafficResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/ServerFilesResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/client/ReferralResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/target/PrivateCloudBackupDuResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/PanelResourceDecorator.php
- src/models/decorators/server/AbstractServerResourceDecorator.php
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (2)
10-10
: Handle the new import reference carefully.The changed import now points to
hiqdev\billing\registry\ResourceDecorator\ResourceDecoratorInterface
, which aligns with the new billing registry approach. Ensure that implementations of this interface in your codebase are updated to maintain consistent behavior.
20-20
: Confirm that external dependencies do not rely on this method.Changing the
convertAmount
method frompublic
toprivate
may break external callers if they previously referenced this method. Verify that no external references exist.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage and context of this method.
Let me try one more search to ensure we have a complete picture.
The method change from public to private is safe
The
convertAmount
method inhipanel\modules\finance\helpers\ResourceHelper
is only used internally within the same class to delegate the call to\hiqdev\billing\registry\helper\ResourceHelper::convertAmount()
. From the search results:
- The method is only called once within its own class implementation
- No external files are using
ResourceHelper::convertAmount
directly- The method acts as a proxy to another class's implementation in the
hiqdev\billing\registry
namespace🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search occurrences of the old public method usage outside this file rg -A 3 -B 3 -F 'ResourceHelper::convertAmount'Length of output: 520
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the full implementation of ResourceHelper class ast-grep --pattern $'class ResourceHelper { $$$ }'Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any other potential usages with different patterns rg -A 3 -B 3 "convertAmount.*ResourceDecorator"Length of output: 473
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any test files that might be using this method fd "ResourceHelperTest" --exec cat {}Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the namespace and see if this is actually calling itself cat src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php | head -n 5Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any class that extends or uses ResourceHelper rg -l "ResourceHelper"Length of output: 232
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (1)
Line range hint
67-82
: Move hardcoded types to configuration.The
totalsOverMax
array contains hardcoded resource types that should be managed through the billing registry configuration.Would you like me to help create a configuration structure for these resource types?
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (2)
100-107
: LGTM! Consider adding PHPDoc.The implementation is clean and handles both aggregation types properly. Consider adding PHPDoc to document the parameters and return type.
+ /** + * Calculates the amount based on the aggregate type + * @param Aggregate $aggregate The aggregate configuration + * @param float|string $amount The current amount + * @param ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator The resource decorator + * @return string The calculated amount + */ private static function calculateAmount(Aggregate $aggregate, $amount, ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator)
65-66
: Consider completing the migration to BillingRegistry.The introduction of
BillingRegistry
is a good architectural change. However, there's still a mix of old and new approaches (e.g., hardcoded types). Consider creating a migration plan to fully transition to the registry-based configuration.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (3)
10-12
: LGTM! Clean import additions.The new imports from the billing registry are well-organized and properly aligned with the implementation changes.
89-93
: LGTM! Clean implementation of aggregate-based calculation.The new implementation properly delegates to the
calculateAmount
method while maintaining the aggregate state.
22-25
: Verify external usage of convertAmount method.The visibility change from public to private is good for encapsulation, but we should verify there are no external consumers of this method.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for more specific usage patterns to ensure we don't miss any external calls.
The visibility change to private is safe to proceed
Based on the search results, the
convertAmount
method is only used internally within theResourceHelper
class itself. All external usages ofResourceHelper
class are calling other public methods likeprepareDetailView
,calculateTotal
,getResourceLoader
, andbuildGridColumns
. The method is not directly accessed from outside the class.The change from public to private visibility is safe as:
- The only calls to
convertAmount
are internal (self::convertAmount
)- These calls appear in the implementation of other methods within the same class
- No external classes are directly using this method
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for external usage of convertAmount method rg -l "ResourceHelper::convertAmount" --type phpLength of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of convertAmount with context rg "convertAmount" --type php -B2 -A2 # Also check for class usage patterns rg "ResourceHelper" --type php -B2 -A2Length of output: 6384
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (1)
95-102
: Consider making the decimal precision configurable.The method uses a hardcoded precision of 3 decimal places. Consider making this configurable to support different currency requirements.
+ private const DEFAULT_PRECISION = 3; + private static function calculateAmount(Aggregate $aggregate, $amount, ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator) { if ($aggregate->isMax()) { return max($amount, self::convertAmount($decorator)); } else { - return bcadd($amount, self::convertAmount($decorator), 3); + return bcadd($amount, self::convertAmount($decorator), self::DEFAULT_PRECISION); } }src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (1)
31-34
: Consider caching the registry instance.The
buildRegistry()
call might be expensive if called frequently. Consider caching the registry instance.class ResourceDecoratorFactory { + private static ?object $registry = null; + public static function createFromResource($resource): ResourceDecoratorInterface { $type = $resource->model_type ?? $resource->type; - $registry = TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); + self::$registry ??= TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry();src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (3)
163-175
: Consider extracting configuration building logic.The configuration building logic could be moved to a separate private method for better maintainability.
+ private function buildConfigurationFromBehavior(ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour $behavior): array + { + $tariffType = $behavior->getTariffType(); + return [ + 'label' => $behavior->getLabel(), + 'columns' => $behavior->columns, + 'groups' => $behavior->groups, + 'model' => $this->createObject($behavior->getModel() ?? Target::class), + 'resourceModel' => $this->createObject($behavior->getResourceModel() ?? TargetResource::class), + ]; + } public function getConfigurations(): array { $configurations = []; /** @var ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour $behavior */ foreach ($this->billingRegistry->getBehaviors(ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour::class) as $behavior) { - $tariffType = $behavior->getTariffType(); - - $configurations[$tariffType->name()] = [ - 'label' => $behavior->getLabel(), - 'columns' => $behavior->columns, - 'groups' => $behavior->groups, - 'model' => $this->createObject($behavior->getModel() ?? Target::class), - 'resourceModel' => $this->createObject($behavior->getResourceModel() ?? TargetResource::class), - ]; + $configurations[$behavior->getTariffType()->name()] = $this->buildConfigurationFromBehavior($behavior); }
177-188
: Document the reason for hard-coded tariff configuration.The comment "Can't be added to Billing Registry" needs more context. Consider adding a TODO to track this technical debt.
- // Can't be added to Billing Registry, so left as it is + // TODO: HP-XXXX This tariff configuration can't be added to Billing Registry because <reason>. + // Consider refactoring to allow all configurations to be managed through the registry. $configurations['tariff'] = [
180-185
: Consider using an enum for traffic types.The traffic-related columns could be defined using an enum for better type safety and maintainability.
enum TrafficType: string { case TRAF95_MAX = 'server_traf95_max'; case TRAF95 = 'server_traf95'; case TRAF95_IN = 'server_traf95_in'; } // Usage: 'columns' => [ TrafficType::TRAF95_MAX->value, TrafficType::TRAF95->value, TrafficType::TRAF95_IN->value, ],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(3 hunks)src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php
(3 hunks)src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (5)
10-13
: LGTM! Good architectural separation of billing logic.The migration of billing-related interfaces and classes to a dedicated
hiqdev\billing\registry
namespace improves separation of concerns and modularity.
23-26
: LGTM! Good encapsulation and delegation.The
convertAmount
method's visibility change to private improves encapsulation, while delegation to the registry helper maintains clean separation of concerns.
87-93
: Address the TODO comment and improve type handling.The TODO comment indicates incomplete implementation for type handling. This needs to be addressed before the code goes to production.
Would you like me to help create a comprehensive list of types that should support overuse and implement proper validation?
66-78
: Verify the billing registry initialization.The billing registry is initialized without error handling. Consider wrapping the initialization in a try-catch block to handle potential configuration errors gracefully.
- $billingRegistry = TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); + try { + $billingRegistry = TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); + } catch (\Exception $e) { + throw new \RuntimeException('Failed to initialize billing registry: ' . $e->getMessage(), 0, $e); + }
Line range hint
1-102
: Verify integration with existing consumption logic.The changes introduce significant architectural improvements but require verification of integration points:
- Ensure the billing registry is properly configured in all environments
- Verify that all existing consumption calculations remain accurate
- Add integration tests for the new billing registry functionality
Run the following script to check for potential integration issues:
✅ Verification successful
Integration verification completed successfully
The changes are properly integrated with the existing consumption logic:
- Billing registry is correctly configured in the DI container
- Resource conversion is properly delegated to the registry implementation
- Existing test infrastructure covers the modified functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential integration points that might be affected rg -l "ConsumptionConfigurator|ResourceHelper::convertAmount" --type php # Check for existing tests that need updates rg -l "class.*Test.*Consumption|class.*Test.*Resource" --type phpLength of output: 483
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how ResourceHelper::convertAmount is used rg "ResourceHelper::convertAmount" -B 2 -A 2 --type php # Check for any existing test files that might have been missed fd -e php -e phpt --full-path ".*tests?.*" # Look for billing registry configuration rg "TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry" -B 2 -A 2 --type phpLength of output: 4412
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (1)
27-44
: Improved error handling and dynamic decorator resolution.The refactoring from static type mapping to dynamic registry-based decorator resolution is a good improvement. However, there are a few considerations:
Please verify that all existing resource types have corresponding behaviors registered in the registry to avoid runtime exceptions. Run this script to check:
✅ Verification successful
Resource type verification completed successfully
The codebase shows a comprehensive set of well-defined resource types with corresponding registry configuration. The error handling in
ResourceDecoratorFactory
is appropriate for catching missing behaviors, whileResourceHelper::addOveruseToTypeIfNeeded()
ensures proper type processing before behavior lookup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all unique resource types in the codebase and compare with registered behaviors # Find all resource types echo "Resource types in codebase:" rg -g '*.php' 'model_type\s*=|type\s*=' --no-filename | sort -u # List registered behaviors echo -e "\nRegistered behaviors in TariffConfiguration:" ast-grep --pattern 'TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry()' -A 10Length of output: 9789
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, locate TariffConfiguration file echo "Locating TariffConfiguration file:" fd TariffConfiguration echo -e "\nSearching for resource type definitions:" # Look for resource type constants and property definitions rg -g '*.php' '(protected|private|public)\s+\$type\s*=\s*[\'"][\w_]+[\'"]|const\s+TYPE_\w+\s*=\s*[\'"][\w_]+[\'"]' --no-filename # Look specifically at ResourceHelper class for type handling echo -e "\nExamining ResourceHelper type handling:" ast-grep --pattern 'class ResourceHelper'Length of output: 318
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Locating TariffConfiguration class:" fd -e php TariffConfiguration echo -e "\nSearching for resource type definitions:" rg -g "*.php" "const TYPE_\w+" --no-filename echo -e "\nLooking for registry building implementation:" rg -g "*.php" "buildRegistry|registerBehavior" -B 2 -A 5 echo -e "\nSearching for behavior registrations:" rg -g "*.php" "ResourceDecoratorBehavior" -B 2 -A 5Length of output: 6930
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (1)
22-24
: Good use of constructor injection and PHP 8 features.The constructor properly uses dependency injection with the readonly property, following best practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (2)
23-26
: Consider improving testability of amount conversionThe direct use of a static method from
\hiqdev\billing\registry\helper\ResourceHelper
makes the code harder to test. Consider dependency injection or an interface-based approach.- private static function convertAmount(ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator) - { - return \hiqdev\billing\registry\helper\ResourceHelper::convertAmount($decorator); - } + private static function convertAmount(ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator, ?ResourceHelperInterface $helper = null) + { + $helper = $helper ?? \hiqdev\billing\registry\helper\ResourceHelper::class; + return $helper::convertAmount($decorator); + }
95-102
: Consider making precision configurableThe precision value of 3 in
bcadd
is hardcoded. Consider making this configurable to support different billing requirements.+ private const DEFAULT_PRECISION = 3; + - private static function calculateAmount(Aggregate $aggregate, $amount, ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator) + private static function calculateAmount(Aggregate $aggregate, $amount, ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator, int $precision = self::DEFAULT_PRECISION) { if ($aggregate->isMax()) { return max($amount, self::convertAmount($decorator)); } else { - return bcadd($amount, self::convertAmount($decorator), 3); + return bcadd($amount, self::convertAmount($decorator), $precision); } }src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (3)
62-91
: Review hard-coded tariff configurationThe tariff configuration is hard-coded with a comment "Can't be added to Billing Registry". This might be a code smell.
Consider:
- Moving this configuration to a separate class that implements
ConsumptionConfigurationBehaviour
- Creating a custom behavior for tariff-specific configurations
- Adding a TODO comment explaining why this can't be added to the registry and tracking it in the issue system
Would you like me to help create a separate configuration class for this?
159-171
: Good caching implementation for column labelsThe caching of column labels is well implemented, preventing redundant calculations. However, consider adding memory limit protection for large configurations.
if ($this->allPossibleColumnsWithLabels === null) { + $columnCount = 0; $this->allPossibleColumnsWithLabels = []; foreach ($this->getConfigurations() as $class => $configuration) { $columns = $configuration['columns']; foreach ($columns as $column) { + if (++$columnCount > 1000) { + throw new \RuntimeException('Too many columns in configurations'); + } $decorator = $this->getDecorator($class, $column); $this->allPossibleColumnsWithLabels[$column] = $decorator->displayTitle(); } } }
Line range hint
174-183
: Consider caching decoratorsThe
getDecorator
method creates a new decorator instance on each call. For frequently accessed types, this could be inefficient.Consider implementing a decorator cache:
+ private array $decoratorCache = []; + private function getDecorator(string $class, string $type): ResourceDecoratorInterface { + $cacheKey = $class . ':' . $type; + if (isset($this->decoratorCache[$cacheKey])) { + return $this->decoratorCache[$cacheKey]; + } + $config = $this->getConfigurationByClass($class); $config['resourceModel']->type = $type; - /** @var ResourceDecoratorInterface $decorator */ - $decorator = $config['resourceModel']->decorator(); - return $decorator; + return $this->decoratorCache[$cacheKey] = $config['resourceModel']->decorator(); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(5 hunks)src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php
(3 hunks)src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/helpers/ResourceHelper.php (1)
85-93
: Address TODO comment and improve type safetyThe TODO comment indicates incomplete implementation. Additionally, string manipulation for type handling is error-prone.
Consider:
- Documenting which types should not have overuse
- Using type-safe enums or constants instead of string manipulation
- Adding validation for supported types
Would you like me to help implement a more type-safe solution or create an issue to track this improvement?
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (2)
19-23
: Improved type safety with explicit parameter typingThe method signature now clearly specifies accepted types (
Resource|AbstractResourceStub
) and return type (ResourceDecoratorInterface
), enhancing type safety and code clarity.
27-44
: Verify error handling for null registryThe implementation looks good with proper error handling and type checking. However, we should ensure the registry is never null.
Also, consider adding null check:
+ if ($registry === null) { + throw new InvalidConfigException('BillingRegistryInterface is not configured'); + }src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (2)
18-24
: Good use of dependency injection and property promotionThe constructor now properly injects dependencies and uses PHP 8's constructor property promotion. The nullable properties with proper initialization improve type safety.
31-46
: Improved type safety with detailed return type annotationThe method documentation now includes a detailed array shape type, which is excellent for type checking and IDE support.
However, the fallback structure might need validation:
✅ Verification successful
Translation key is properly configured and widely used
The translation key "hipanel:finance" is valid and extensively used throughout the codebase as the primary namespace for finance-related translations. The fallback structure follows the established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if these translation keys exist rg "hipanel:finance" -g '*.php' .Length of output: 66662
$billingRegistry = TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); | ||
|
||
$totals = []; | ||
$totalsOverMax = [ | ||
'cdn_cache', | ||
'cdn_cache95', | ||
'cdn_traf95', | ||
'cdn_traf95_max', | ||
'server_traf95', | ||
'server_traf95_in', | ||
'server_traf95_max', | ||
'storage_du', | ||
'storage_du95', | ||
'server_du', | ||
'server_sata', | ||
'server_ssd', | ||
'server_files', | ||
]; | ||
foreach (self::filterByAvailableTypes($resources) as $resource) { | ||
$decorator = $resource->buildResourceModel()->decorator(); | ||
if (in_array($resource->type, $totalsOverMax, true)) { | ||
$totals[$resource->type]['amount'] = max(($totals[$resource->type]['amount'] ?? 0), | ||
self::convertAmount($decorator)); | ||
} else { | ||
$totals[$resource->type]['amount'] = bcadd($totals[$resource->type]['amount'] ?? 0, | ||
self::convertAmount($decorator), | ||
3); | ||
} | ||
$type = $resource->type; | ||
$aggregate = $billingRegistry->getAggregate(self::addOveruseToTypeIfNeeded($type)); | ||
|
||
$totals[$type]['amount'] = self::calculateAmount( | ||
$aggregate, | ||
$totals[$type]['amount'] ?? 0, | ||
$decorator, | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid direct instantiation of the billing registry
The direct use of TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry()
creates tight coupling. Consider injecting the registry as a dependency.
- public static function calculateTotal(array $resources): array
+ public static function calculateTotal(array $resources, ?BillingRegistryInterface $registry = null): array
{
- $billingRegistry = TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry();
+ $billingRegistry = $registry ?? TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry();
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
$billingRegistry = TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); | |
$totals = []; | |
$totalsOverMax = [ | |
'cdn_cache', | |
'cdn_cache95', | |
'cdn_traf95', | |
'cdn_traf95_max', | |
'server_traf95', | |
'server_traf95_in', | |
'server_traf95_max', | |
'storage_du', | |
'storage_du95', | |
'server_du', | |
'server_sata', | |
'server_ssd', | |
'server_files', | |
]; | |
foreach (self::filterByAvailableTypes($resources) as $resource) { | |
$decorator = $resource->buildResourceModel()->decorator(); | |
if (in_array($resource->type, $totalsOverMax, true)) { | |
$totals[$resource->type]['amount'] = max(($totals[$resource->type]['amount'] ?? 0), | |
self::convertAmount($decorator)); | |
} else { | |
$totals[$resource->type]['amount'] = bcadd($totals[$resource->type]['amount'] ?? 0, | |
self::convertAmount($decorator), | |
3); | |
} | |
$type = $resource->type; | |
$aggregate = $billingRegistry->getAggregate(self::addOveruseToTypeIfNeeded($type)); | |
$totals[$type]['amount'] = self::calculateAmount( | |
$aggregate, | |
$totals[$type]['amount'] ?? 0, | |
$decorator, | |
); | |
public static function calculateTotal(array $resources, ?BillingRegistryInterface $registry = null): array | |
{ | |
$billingRegistry = $registry ?? TariffConfiguration::buildRegistry(); | |
$totals = []; | |
foreach (self::filterByAvailableTypes($resources) as $resource) { | |
$decorator = $resource->buildResourceModel()->decorator(); | |
$type = $resource->type; | |
$aggregate = $billingRegistry->getAggregate(self::addOveruseToTypeIfNeeded($type)); | |
$totals[$type]['amount'] = self::calculateAmount( | |
$aggregate, | |
$totals[$type]['amount'] ?? 0, | |
$decorator, | |
); |
use hiqdev\billing\registry\product\Aggregate; | ||
use hiqdev\billing\registry\product\GType; | ||
use hiqdev\billing\registry\ResourceDecorator\ResourceDecoratorInterface; | ||
use hiqdev\billing\registry\TariffConfiguration; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration to billing registry system is incomplete
The codebase shows a mixed usage of old and new decorator implementations:
- The old
ResourceDecoratorFactory
insrc/models/decorators/
is still active - New registry-based decorators are being adopted across multiple files
- Both old and new namespaces are currently in use
This partial migration could lead to inconsistent behavior. Consider completing the migration by:
- Moving the
ResourceDecoratorFactory
to the new namespace - Updating all remaining references to the old namespace
- Ensuring consistent usage of the new registry-based decorators throughout the codebase
🔗 Analysis chain
Architectural change: Migration to billing registry system
The shift from local decorators to the billing registry system suggests a move towards a more standardized billing configuration. This change improves maintainability by centralizing billing logic.
Let's verify that all local decorator usages have been migrated:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old decorator namespace
rg "hipanel\\\\modules\\\\finance\\\\models\\\\decorators\\\\ResourceDecoratorInterface" --type php
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old namespace pattern
rg "hipanel\\\\modules\\\\finance\\\\models\\\\decorators" --type php
# Search for the new decorator interface usage
rg "hiqdev\\\\billing\\\\registry\\\\ResourceDecorator" --type php
# Search for class implementations of ResourceDecoratorInterface
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements ResourceDecoratorInterface'
Length of output: 1562
…with which data we are working
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfiguratorData.php (1)
14-20
: Consider making all constructor parameters privateCurrently, only
$label
is private while others are public. For better encapsulation, consider making all parameters private and providing getter methods if needed.public function __construct( private readonly string $label, - public readonly array $columns, - public readonly array $groups, - public readonly Target|Server|Hub|Client $model, - public readonly Resource|ResourceProxy $resourceModel + private readonly array $columns, + private readonly array $groups, + private readonly Target|Server|Hub|Client $model, + private readonly Resource|ResourceProxy $resourceModel )src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (2)
82-93
: Consider extracting hardcoded 'tariff' configurationThe comment "Can't be added to Billing Registry" suggests a design limitation. Consider:
- Adding this configuration to the registry
- Or creating a dedicated factory for special configurations
66-80
: Consider breaking down the configuration building logicThe buildConfigurations method handles multiple responsibilities:
- Iterating through behaviors
- Creating configuration objects
- Setting up models
Consider extracting the configuration creation logic into a separate factory class.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(3 hunks)src/helpers/ConsumptionConfiguratorData.php
(1 hunks)src/models/Target.php
(2 hunks)src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfiguratorData.php (1)
12-28
: Well-designed data transfer object with strong type safety!Great use of PHP 8 features:
- Readonly properties ensure immutability
- Union types provide type safety
- Strict types enabled
src/models/Target.php (1)
45-53
: LGTM! Good improvement in type safetyThe change from array to ConsumptionConfiguratorData improves type safety and makes the code more maintainable.
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (1)
29-40
: Good error handling with specific exception messageThe try-catch block properly handles BehaviorNotFoundException and provides a clear error message.
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (1)
24-26
: LGTM! Good use of dependency injectionThe constructor properly injects BillingRegistryInterface as a readonly dependency.
private static function createResourceDecoratorData(Resource|AbstractResourceStub $resource): ResourceDecoratorData | ||
{ | ||
return new ResourceDecoratorData( | ||
$resource->quantity, | ||
$resource->price, | ||
$resource->unit, | ||
$resource->currency, | ||
$resource->type, | ||
$resource->part->partno, | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Property access validation required
The codebase analysis confirms that part
property access is not validated before use. This could lead to runtime errors if the property is null. Add null checks before accessing part->partno
:
if ($resource->part === null) {
throw new InvalidConfigException('Resource part cannot be null');
}
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider validating required properties
The createResourceDecoratorData method assumes all required properties exist. Consider adding null checks for critical properties like part->partno
.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential null dereference of part->partno
ast-grep --pattern 'resource->part->partno'
Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find Resource and AbstractResourceStub class definitions
echo "=== Searching for Resource class ==="
fd -e php -E vendor -E tests | xargs rg "class Resource" -A 5
echo -e "\n=== Searching for AbstractResourceStub class ==="
fd -e php -E vendor -E tests | xargs rg "class AbstractResourceStub" -A 5
echo -e "\n=== Looking for part property declarations ==="
fd -e php -E vendor -E tests | xargs rg "protected.*part|private.*part|public.*part" --type php
echo -e "\n=== Checking for validation in ResourceDecoratorFactory ==="
fd ResourceDecoratorFactory.php -E vendor -E tests | xargs cat
Length of output: 7150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Model class and property validation
echo "=== Searching for Model class and property validation ==="
fd -e php -E vendor -E tests | xargs rg "class Model" -A 10
echo -e "\n=== Searching for ModelTrait usage ==="
fd -e php -E vendor -E tests | xargs rg "trait ModelTrait" -A 10
echo -e "\n=== Looking for property validation patterns ==="
fd -e php -E vendor -E tests | xargs rg "isset.*part|property_exists.*part|hasProperty.*part" --type php
echo -e "\n=== Searching for part property in all PHP files ==="
fd -e php -E vendor -E tests | xargs rg "\$part|\->part" --type php
Length of output: 844
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (1)
42-51
:⚠️ Potential issueAdd property validation before access.
The method directly accesses properties without validation. Add null checks for critical properties to prevent runtime errors.
private static function createResourceDecoratorData(Resource|AbstractResourceStub $resource): ResourceDecoratorData { + if ($resource->part === null) { + throw new InvalidConfigException('Resource part cannot be null'); + } + + if ($resource->quantity === null) { + throw new InvalidConfigException('Resource quantity cannot be null'); + } + return new ResourceDecoratorData( $resource->quantity, $resource->price, $resource->unit, $resource->currency, $resource->type, $resource->part->partno, ); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (1)
19-40
: Validate registry object creation.While the new registry-based approach is good, consider validating the registry object creation to handle potential configuration issues gracefully.
- $registry = Yii::createObject(BillingRegistryInterface::class); + try { + $registry = Yii::createObject(BillingRegistryInterface::class); + } catch (\Throwable $e) { + throw new InvalidConfigException( + "Failed to create billing registry: " . $e->getMessage(), + 0, + $e + ); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/models/decorators/ResourceDecoratorFactory.php (2)
1-14
: LGTM! Good improvements to type safety.The addition of strict types and well-organized imports enhance code reliability.
27-36
: Verify integration with billing registry.Let's verify that all components are properly integrated with the new billing registry approach.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with billing registry is properly implemented
The changes in ResourceDecoratorFactory are consistent with the codebase-wide integration pattern. All components are properly connected:
- Registry is correctly configured in the application
- Resource classes implement required interfaces
- Decorator creation is properly centralized through the factory
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of billing registry components # Check for other classes using BillingRegistryInterface echo "=== Classes using BillingRegistryInterface ===" rg "BillingRegistryInterface" --type php # Check for ResourceDecoratorBehavior implementations echo -e "\n=== ResourceDecoratorBehavior implementations ===" rg "implements.*ResourceDecoratorBehavior|extends.*ResourceDecoratorBehavior" --type php # Check for other classes creating decorators echo -e "\n=== Other decorator creation patterns ===" rg "createDecorator|createFromResource" --type phpLength of output: 1606
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Deep verification of decorator behavior and registry configuration # Check for ResourceDecoratorBehavior class implementations using AST echo "=== ResourceDecoratorBehavior implementations (AST) ===" ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements ResourceDecoratorBehavior { $$$ }' # Check registry configuration echo -e "\n=== Registry Configuration ===" cat config/web.php | grep -A 10 "BillingRegistryInterface::class"Length of output: 558
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Final verification of behavior patterns # Check for behavior trait implementations echo "=== Behavior Trait Patterns ===" rg "trait.*ResourceDecorator|use.*ResourceDecorator" --type php # Check for behavior usage in type hints echo -e "\n=== Behavior Type Usage ===" rg "ResourceDecoratorBehavior" --type phpLength of output: 1955
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (3)
82-93
: Consider extracting hard-coded tariff configuration.The hard-coded tariff configuration should be moved to a configuration file or registry for better maintainability.
111-126
: Consider simplifying groups handling logic.The current implementation is complex and could benefit from:
- Adding PHPDoc with array shape description
- Using array_values to ensure sequential keys
- Consider using collection objects for better type safety
- private function getGroups(string $class): array + /** + * @param string $class + * @return array<int, array<int, string>> + */ + private function getGroups(string $class): array { $groups = []; $columns = $this->getColumns($class); foreach ($this->getConfigurationByClass($class)->groups as $group) { - $groups[] = $group; + $groups[] = array_values($group); foreach ($group as $item) { $columns = array_diff($columns, [$item]); } } foreach ($columns as $column) { $groups[] = [$column]; } return $groups; }
Line range hint
1-241
: Good architectural improvements, consider further enhancements.The changes show good progress in terms of:
- Integration with BillingRegistry
- Performance optimization with caching
- Better encapsulation
Consider these architectural improvements:
- Extract configuration building to a separate service
- Add interfaces for better dependency inversion
- Consider using value objects for complex data structures
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/helpers/ConsumptionConfigurator.php (4)
1-18
: LGTM! Good use of encapsulation.The class is properly marked as final and has well-organized imports.
19-26
: LGTM! Excellent use of modern PHP features.Good practices observed:
- Private properties with proper type hints
- Constructor property promotion with readonly
- Null initialization for lazy loading
142-163
: LGTM! Excellent performance optimization.Good implementation of caching to avoid repeated heavy decorator instantiation.
33-47
: Verify type safety in createObject method.While the fallback mechanism is good, ensure that all possible class names passed to createObject extend Model to prevent runtime errors.
✅ Verification successful
Type safety is properly maintained ✓
Both
Target
andTargetResource
classes extend fromModel
(directly or through inheritance), ensuring type safety with thecreateObject
method's return type.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for class declarations to verify they extend Model ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Model { $$$ }'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find Target and TargetResource class definitions rg "class (Target|TargetResource)" -A 5 # Find createObject method implementation ast-grep --pattern 'function createObject($$$) { $$$ }' # Fallback to grep for createObject rg "function createObject" -A 5 # Find any base class that Target or TargetResource might extend rg "class (Target|TargetResource) extends" -A 2Length of output: 5486
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find Resource class definition rg "class Resource" -A 3 # Alternative search in case Resource is in a namespace rg "class Resource(\s|$)" -A 3Length of output: 3468
public function buildResourceModel(ActiveRecordInterface $resource): object | ||
{ | ||
$config = $this->getConfigurationByClass($resource->class); | ||
$config['resourceModel']->setAttributes([ | ||
|
||
$config->resourceModel->setAttributes([ | ||
'type' => $resource->type, | ||
'unit' => $resource->unit, | ||
'quantity' => $resource->getAmount(), | ||
]); | ||
|
||
return $config['resourceModel']; | ||
return $config->resourceModel; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public function fillTheOriginalModel(Consumption $consumption) | ||
public function fillTheOriginalModel(Consumption $consumption): object | ||
{ | ||
$configuration = $this->getConfigurationByClass($consumption->class); | ||
$configuration['model']->setAttributes($consumption->mainObject, false); | ||
|
||
return $configuration['model']; | ||
$configuration->model->setAttributes($consumption->mainObject, false); | ||
|
||
return $configuration->model; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving type safety and validation.
Two potential improvements:
- Use a more specific return type instead of
object
- Consider using
setAttributes($attributes, true)
to enable validation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
config/web.php (1)
199-202
: Consider the architectural implications of the registry pattern.The introduction of a billing registry suggests a move towards a more flexible and maintainable billing type configuration system. However, consider the following architectural recommendations:
- Document the registry's role and responsibilities
- Consider using a non-static factory for better testability
- Add integration tests to verify the registry's initialization and configuration
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
config/web.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
config/web.php (1)
200-202
: Verify the registry initialization.The new
BillingRegistryInterface
singleton is initialized using a static factory method. Please ensure that:
- The registry is properly initialized with all required billing types
- The static initialization doesn't cause any issues with testing or dependency injection
Run this script to verify the usage of
BillingRegistryInterface
across the codebase:✅ Verification successful
The registry initialization appears to be properly implemented ✅
The implementation shows good practices:
- Registry is properly configured as a singleton in the DI container
- Consumer classes correctly use dependency injection
- Static initialization is isolated to the configuration layer
While there is one static call in ResourceHelper, it's an acceptable utility usage that doesn't impact the overall architecture.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how BillingRegistryInterface is used across the codebase # Find all files that use BillingRegistryInterface echo "Files using BillingRegistryInterface:" rg -l "BillingRegistryInterface" # Find all calls to buildRegistry echo -e "\nCalls to buildRegistry:" rg "buildRegistry\(\)"Length of output: 552
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementation and test coverage # Find TariffConfiguration implementation echo "TariffConfiguration implementation:" rg -p "class TariffConfiguration" # Look for buildRegistry implementation echo -e "\nbuildRegistry implementation:" ast-grep --pattern 'static function buildRegistry() { $$$ }' # Check test files echo -e "\nTest files mentioning BillingRegistryInterface:" fd -e php test | xargs rg "BillingRegistryInterface" # Check how it's used in the dependent files echo -e "\nUsage patterns:" rg -A 5 "BillingRegistryInterface" --type phpLength of output: 3002
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for registry implementation and test helpers # Look for buildRegistry implementation in vendor echo "Looking for TariffConfiguration in vendor:" fd -t f TariffConfiguration.php # Check for test helpers or mocks echo -e "\nLooking for test helpers or mocks:" fd -e php -t f mock test fd -e php -t f fake test # Check ResourceHelper implementation echo -e "\nResourceHelper implementation:" rg -p "class ResourceHelper" -A 10Length of output: 1008
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ConsumptionConfiguratorData
, for better data encapsulation.Improvements
Target
class to utilize the newConsumptionConfiguratorData
for configuration handling.Bug Fixes