Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change transparancy in opacity in background view settings #36612

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

silamon
Copy link
Contributor

@silamon silamon commented Dec 30, 2024

Proposed change

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated dashboard view configuration documentation to use "opacity" instead of "transparency" for background settings
    • Clarified background image configuration terminology
    • Updated example YAML configuration to reflect new terminology

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch next This PR goes into the next branch labels Dec 30, 2024
@home-assistant
Copy link

It seems that this PR is targeted against an incorrect branch. Documentation updates which apply to our current stable release should target the current branch. Please change the target branch of this PR to current and rebase if needed. If this is documentation for a new feature, please add a link to that PR in your description.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 30, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1e03b20
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/677282300815e20008571ce3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-36612--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot removed the needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch label Dec 30, 2024
@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo label Dec 30, 2024
@silamon silamon added the parent-merged The parent PR has been merged already label Dec 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a terminology change in the dashboard views documentation, replacing the term "transparency" with "opacity" when describing background settings. This modification updates the configuration section to use a more precise term for defining the background image's visual property. The change ensures consistent language in the documentation, with the opacity still represented as an integer value between 0 and 100.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/dashboards/views.markdown Replaced "transparency" with "opacity" in background configuration documentation

The changes are purely terminological, updating the documentation to use more accurate terminology for describing background image settings in dashboard views.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a5c773 and 1e03b20.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/dashboards/views.markdown (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/dashboards/views.markdown (2)

244-244: LGTM! Example configuration is consistent.

The example YAML configuration correctly demonstrates the opacity setting with a helpful comment about the valid percentage range.


211-214: LGTM! The terminology change improves accuracy.

The change from "transparency" to "opacity" aligns better with web development standards and CSS terminology. The description and value range (0-100) are clear and accurate.

Could you confirm if this change is purely documentation-related, or if the actual YAML configuration key is also changing from transparency to opacity? This would help determine if this is a breaking change requiring migration steps.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation-only change confirmed, no breaking changes

Based on the search results, this is purely a documentation improvement:

  • The term "transparency" in the codebase is only used in documentation contexts and in unrelated features (like Google Calendar, NFAndroidTV).
  • The actual YAML configuration appears to have been using "opacity" already, as evidenced by the current documentation showing "opacity" in both the configuration reference and example.
  • This change simply aligns the documentation terminology with the existing implementation and web standards.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing usage of both terms in YAML files
echo "Searching for current usage in YAML files..."
rg -t yaml "transparency:" 
rg -t yaml "opacity:"

Length of output: 147


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find any mentions of these terms in the codebase
echo "Searching for 'transparency' mentions..."
rg -i "transparency" --type md --type yaml

echo -e "\nSearching for 'opacity' mentions..."
rg -i "opacity" --type md --type yaml

echo -e "\nLooking at git history of the file..."
git log -p source/dashboards/views.markdown | grep -A 5 -B 5 "transparency\|opacity"

Length of output: 3495


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on next This PR goes into the next branch parent-merged The parent PR has been merged already
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant