Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Supervisor log fallback for the /follow endpoint #5354

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

sairon
Copy link
Member

@sairon sairon commented Oct 15, 2024

Proposed change

When an error occurs when streaming Supervisor logs, the fallback method receives the follow kwarg as well, which is invalid for the Docker log handler:

TypeError: APISupervisor.logs() got an unexpected keyword argument 'follow'

The exception is still printed to the logs but with all the extra noise caused by this error. Removing the argument makes the stack trace more comprehensible and the fallback actually works as desired.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to the supervisor)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to cli pull request:
  • Link to client library pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format supervisor tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If API endpoints or add-on configuration are added/changed:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an asynchronous function to retrieve supervisor logs with enhanced error handling.
    • Added advanced logging routes for multicast API functionalities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated tests to verify error handling for the logs API, ensuring proper logging behavior and response status.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced clarity on API route management and logging capabilities through updated comments and test cases.

When an error occurs when streaming Supervisor logs, the fallback method
receives the follow kwarg as well, which is invalid for the Docker log
handler:

 TypeError: APISupervisor.logs() got an unexpected keyword argument 'follow'

The exception is still printed to the logs but with all the extra noise
caused by this error. Removing the argument makes the stack trace more
comprehensible and the fallback actually works as desired.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the RestAPI class in supervisor/api/__init__.py, introducing a new asynchronous method get_supervisor_logs for managing supervisor log retrieval with improved error handling. The _register_root method has been updated to remove the route for /supervisor/available_updates. Additionally, new logging routes for the multicast API have been added. Correspondingly, the test suite in tests/api/test_supervisor.py has been enhanced to verify the error handling of the API, including new test cases for the /supervisor/logs/follow endpoint and modifications to existing tests.

Changes

File Change Summary
supervisor/api/init.py - Added method: async def get_supervisor_logs(*args, **kwargs)
- Updated method: _register_root(self) -> None (removed route for /supervisor/available_updates)
- Added advanced logging routes for the multicast API
tests/api/test_supervisor.py - Added test case for fallback mechanism on /supervisor/logs/follow endpoint
- Modified existing test for /supervisor/logs to ensure proper exception logging and response validation

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant SupervisorLogs

    Client->>API: Request supervisor logs
    API->>SupervisorLogs: Call get_supervisor_logs()
    SupervisorLogs-->>API: Return logs
    API-->>Client: Send logs response
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant SupervisorLogs

    Client->>API: Request follow logs
    API->>SupervisorLogs: Call get_supervisor_logs()
    alt Success
        SupervisorLogs-->>API: Return logs
        API-->>Client: Send logs response
    else Error
        API-->>Client: Send error response
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/api/test_supervisor.py (2)

186-196: LGTM! Consider adding content verification.

The new test case for the /supervisor/logs/follow endpoint is well-structured and improves the overall test coverage. It correctly checks for the expected status code and content type.

Consider adding a check for the content of the response, similar to the test for the non-follow endpoint. This would ensure that the fallback mechanism is returning the expected log data. For example:

content = await resp.read()
assert content.startswith(b"\x1b[36m")  # Check for the expected color code

Line range hint 214-233: LGTM! Consider adding a positive test case.

The modifications to test_api_supervisor_fallback_log_capture improve the test coverage by differentiating between expected and unexpected errors. The test now correctly verifies that Sentry log capture is only called for unexpected errors.

Consider adding a positive test case where no exception is raised to ensure that the normal flow doesn't trigger Sentry log capture. For example:

journald_logs.side_effect = None
journald_logs.return_value = "Some log data"

with patch("supervisor.api.capture_exception") as capture_exception:
    await api_client.get("/supervisor/logs")
    capture_exception.assert_not_called()

This would provide complete coverage of all possible scenarios.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95c6389 and e51effc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • supervisor/api/init.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/api/test_supervisor.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/api/test_supervisor.py (2)

Line range hint 198-211: LGTM! Improved error handling coverage.

The modifications to include a check for OSError in addition to HassioError enhance the robustness of the test case. This change ensures that the fallback mechanism works correctly for different types of exceptions that might occur during log retrieval.


Line range hint 1-233: Overall assessment: Excellent improvements to test coverage and error handling

The changes in this file significantly enhance the test suite for the Supervisor API, particularly in relation to log retrieval and error handling. The new test case for the /supervisor/logs/follow endpoint and the modifications to existing tests align well with the PR objectives of fixing the Supervisor log fallback mechanism.

Key improvements:

  1. Added coverage for the /supervisor/logs/follow endpoint.
  2. Enhanced error handling tests to cover both HassioError and OSError.
  3. Improved Sentry log capture tests to differentiate between expected and unexpected errors.

These changes contribute to a more robust and comprehensive test suite, which will help maintain the reliability of the Supervisor API.

supervisor/api/__init__.py (1)

416-417: Properly handling the 'follow' parameter in the fallback.

The removal of the 'follow' parameter from kwargs before calling api_supervisor.logs ensures that no unexpected keyword arguments are passed to the fallback method, preventing a TypeError. This is a good fix for the issue described.

@agners agners merged commit cc9a931 into main Oct 16, 2024
22 checks passed
@agners agners deleted the fix-supervisor-follow-fallback branch October 16, 2024 07:04
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants