Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add helper function to check if 'cloud_enable' toggle is available #484

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

DCSBL
Copy link
Collaborator

@DCSBL DCSBL commented Jan 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a method to check cloud functionality support for devices
    • Introduced cloud enable support validation for different device models
  • Tests

    • Updated existing test cases to verify cloud enable support
    • Added new test functions to validate device support capabilities

@DCSBL DCSBL enabled auto-merge (squash) January 23, 2025 21:11
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new method supports_cloud_enable() to the Device class in the homewizard_energy/models.py file. This method determines whether a device supports cloud functionality based on its product type, specifically excluding battery-powered devices. Corresponding test cases have been added in both v1 and v2 test files to validate the new method's behavior across different device models.

Changes

File Change Summary
homewizard_energy/models.py Added supports_cloud_enable() method to Device class, returning False for battery models
tests/v1/test_v1_models.py Updated test_device_support_functions to include supports_cloud_enable parameter in test cases
tests/v2/test_v2_models.py Added new test_device_support_functions test with supports_cloud_enable validation

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Device
    participant Model
    
    Device->>Model: Check product type
    alt Not Battery Model
        Device-->>Model: Return True (Cloud Enabled)
    else Battery Model
        Device-->>Model: Return False (Cloud Disabled)
    end
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the logic of the supports_cloud_enable() method, showing how the device determines its cloud support based on its product type.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.63%. Comparing base (6c85910) to head (595ff72).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #484   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.63%   99.63%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         544      546    +2     
  Branches       40       40           
=======================================
+ Hits          542      544    +2     
  Misses          1        1           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DCSBL DCSBL merged commit c17fa78 into main Jan 23, 2025
32 checks passed
@DCSBL DCSBL deleted the DCSBL-2025-52 branch January 23, 2025 21:13
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c85910 and 595ff72.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • homewizard_energy/models.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/v1/test_v1_models.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/v2/test_v2_models.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Scanning
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/v1/test_v1_models.py (1)

61-84: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.

The test cases thoroughly cover all device models with appropriate cloud enable support values.

tests/v2/test_v2_models.py (1)

123-142: Verify test coverage for v2 models.

The test cases only cover HWE-P1 and HWE-BAT models, while the v1 tests cover a broader range of devices. Please verify if this is intentional due to v2 API support limitations.

✅ Verification successful

Limited v2 API test coverage is intentional

The v2 API test coverage is correctly limited to HWE-P1 and HWE-BAT models as these appear to be the only models currently supporting the v2 API. This is evidenced by:

  • V2 API requires HTTPS and authentication tokens, indicating a newer security model
  • HWE-BAT model is only tested in v2, suggesting it's a newer device designed for v2 API
  • Codebase includes explicit v2 API support checking functionality
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for v2 API model support in the codebase

# Search for v2 API model definitions or constants
rg -l "HWE-" --type py

Length of output: 200


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get model definitions and v1/v2 test coverage comparison

# Check model definitions in const.py
echo "=== Model definitions in const.py ==="
rg "HWE-" homewizard_energy/const.py -B1 -A1

echo -e "\n=== V1 test models ==="
rg "HWE-" tests/v1/test_v1_models.py

echo -e "\n=== V2 test models ==="
rg "HWE-" tests/v2/test_v2_models.py

# Look for v2 API documentation or comments
echo -e "\n=== V2 API documentation/comments ==="
rg -i "v2.*api" --type py

Length of output: 7002

Comment on lines +114 to +117
def supports_cloud_enable(self) -> bool:
"""Return if the device supports state."""
return self.product_type != Model.BATTERY

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect docstring.

The docstring appears to be copy-pasted from supports_state() method. Update it to accurately describe the cloud enable functionality.

-        """Return if the device supports state."""
+        """Return if the device supports cloud enable functionality.
+        
+        Battery-powered devices do not support cloud enable functionality.
+        """
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def supports_cloud_enable(self) -> bool:
"""Return if the device supports state."""
return self.product_type != Model.BATTERY
def supports_cloud_enable(self) -> bool:
"""Return if the device supports cloud enable functionality.
Battery-powered devices do not support cloud enable functionality.
"""
return self.product_type != Model.BATTERY

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant