Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce run.get_by_id() #140

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: enh/run-remove-solution
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

glatterf42
Copy link
Member

The second part of cleaning up #101. This exposes the run.get_by_id() function to all remaining data layers as it is only used by run.clone() (see next clean up PR) in the data/server layers (and present already in the DB layer).

@glatterf42 glatterf42 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 28, 2024
@glatterf42 glatterf42 self-assigned this Nov 28, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.0%. Comparing base (6ebef60) to head (2e9cb4c).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ixmp4/data/abstract/run.py 50.0% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##           enh/run-remove-solution    #140   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                     86.9%   87.0%           
=======================================================
  Files                          228     228           
  Lines                         8141    8149    +8     
=======================================================
+ Hits                          7081    7093   +12     
+ Misses                        1060    1056    -4     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
ixmp4/data/api/run.py 97.9% <100.0%> (+0.1%) ⬆️
ixmp4/server/rest/run.py 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
ixmp4/data/abstract/run.py 80.8% <50.0%> (-1.4%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant