[Bindless][E2E] Fix read_norm_types test failure #13723
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix the read_norm_types test failure by moving the calculation of work item ids inside dimension selecting constexprs. get_global_id(x) where x is greater than NDims in the nd_item causes the kernel to crash. Remove XFAIL from the test. Also, fixup the test as it was not sampling the whole image correctly or validating every element in the image.
isaacault
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
DBDuncan
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
|
@intel/llvm-gatekeepers can we merge this please? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix the read_norm_types test failure by moving the calculation of work item ids inside dimension selecting constexprs. get_global_id(x) where x is greater than NDims in the nd_item causes the kernel to crash.
Remove XFAIL from the test.
Also, fixup the test as it was not sampling the whole image correctly or validating every element in the image.
Addresses issue: #13281