Add writable gateways talk to ipfs as infra track #56
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@RangerMauve, mind rebasing this against the "connecting IPFS" track? Writable gateways are emerging as a core theme form that track 😄. cc @mikeal for a review |
RangerMauve
force-pushed
the
writable-gateways
branch
from
253c945
to
fd52244
Compare
|
@b5 How does that sound? |
lidel
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2022
|
Should I re-rebase? 😅 |
|
Merged via aaf919e |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We'll be talking about the existing state of writable gateways, work on standardizing writable gateways, and some of the use cases for them in browsers and applications.
Related: AgregoreWeb/agregore-ipfs-daemon#10