Maint/295 maintenance align banner configuration with refarch templates #297
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related issues
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)refarch-integrations/pom.xml (2)
The rename from
The property reference has been correctly updated to use the new property name, maintaining consistency throughout the POM file. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
Component: API-Gateway
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
refarch-gateway/pom.xml(2 hunks)refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml(2 hunks)refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/banner.txt(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/pom.xml(2 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/pom.xml(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/banner.txt(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
[error] 2-2: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
[error] 68-68: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🪛 LanguageTool
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/banner.txt
[style] ~11-~11: To make your writing clearer, consider a more direct alternative.
Context: ...ave suggestions for improvement? Please take a look at https://github.com/it-at-m/refa...
(TAKE_A_LOOK)
[typographical] ~12-~12: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...en an issue. If you want to provide a PR please take a look at our Contribution Guideli...
(IF_PLEASE_COMMA)
[style] ~12-~12: To make your writing clearer, consider a more direct alternative.
Context: ...sue. If you want to provide a PR please take a look at our Contribution Guidelines. --...
(TAKE_A_LOOK)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/banner.txt
[style] ~10-~10: To make your writing clearer, consider a more direct alternative.
Context: ...ave suggestions for improvement? Please take a look at https://github.com/it-at-m/refa...
(TAKE_A_LOOK)
[typographical] ~11-~11: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...en an issue. If you want to provide a PR please take a look at our Contribution Guideli...
(IF_PLEASE_COMMA)
[style] ~11-~11: To make your writing clearer, consider a more direct alternative.
Context: ...sue. If you want to provide a PR please take a look at our Contribution Guidelines. --...
(TAKE_A_LOOK)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml (1)
3-5: LGTM! Verify Maven properties are defined.
The removal of quotes around Maven placeholders is correct, and adding the description property enhances application metadata visibility.
Let's verify that all referenced Maven properties are properly defined:
✅ Verification successful
Maven properties are properly defined and aligned with application.yml
The verification confirms that all required Maven properties (project.artifactId, project.version, and project.description) are properly defined in the service's pom.xml:
- artifactId: refarch-s3-integration-rest-service
- version: inherited from parent (1.4.0-SNAPSHOT)
- description: "Integration for CRUD operations on a s3 storage"
The unquoted placeholders in application.yml will correctly resolve to these values during the Maven build process.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all Maven properties are defined in pom.xml files
# Looking for: project.artifactId, project.version, project.description
# Search for property definitions in pom.xml files
fd pom.xml --exec grep -l -E "<(artifactId|version|description)>" {} \;
Length of output: 3794
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific pom.xml for the service to verify these exact properties
grep -A1 "<artifactId>\|<version>\|<description>" ./refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/pom.xml
Length of output: 2782
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/banner.txt (1)
2-7: Verify placeholder configurations in application properties
The banner uses dynamic placeholders that need corresponding entries in application properties.
✅ Verification successful
All banner placeholders are properly configured
The verification shows that all placeholders used in banner.txt have corresponding configurations in the application.yml file:
${spring.application.name}is configured via@project.artifactId@${info.application.version}is configured via@project.version@${info.build.java.version}is configured via@java.version@${spring-boot.version}is available by default in Spring Boot${info.application.description}is configured via@project.description@
The placeholders use Maven's resource filtering (using @ symbols) which will be replaced during the build process with actual values from the pom.xml file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all placeholders used in banner.txt have corresponding properties defined
# Search for the required properties in application.yml/properties files
echo "Searching for required properties..."
rg -l "info.application.version|info.build.java.version|info.application.description" --type yaml --type properties
# Check if spring.application.name is defined
rg "spring.application.name" --type yaml --type properties
Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for application properties/yaml files and their content
echo "Searching for application properties/yaml files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties
# Check content of any application properties/yaml files
echo -e "\nChecking content of application files..."
for f in $(fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties); do
echo "=== Content of $f ==="
cat "$f"
echo -e "\n"
done
Length of output: 19169
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/banner.txt (4)
1-13: Overall banner structure looks great!
The changes successfully align the banner configuration with reference architecture templates. The structure is clean, consistent, and provides valuable information to users.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~11-~11: To make your writing clearer, consider a more direct alternative.
Context: ...ave suggestions for improvement? Please take a look at https://github.com/it-at-m/refa...
(TAKE_A_LOOK)
[typographical] ~12-~12: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...en an issue. If you want to provide a PR please take a look at our Contribution Guideli...
(IF_PLEASE_COMMA)
[style] ~12-~12: To make your writing clearer, consider a more direct alternative.
Context: ...sue. If you want to provide a PR please take a look at our Contribution Guidelines. --...
(TAKE_A_LOOK)
8-8: Verify application description property
The addition of an about section improves application documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Property is correctly configured
The info.application.description property is properly configured in the application.yml file. It's set to use the Maven project description placeholder @project.description@, which will be replaced with the actual project description during the build process.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify info.application.description is configured
rg "info\.application\.description" --type yaml
Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for application description property in yaml/properties files with broader patterns
rg -t yaml -t properties "application:" -A 5
rg -t yaml -t properties "info:" -A 5
Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for application description in yaml files and application properties
rg -t yaml "application:" -A 5
rg -t yaml "info:" -A 5
fd "application.properties|application.yml" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 6762
2-2: Verify spring.application.name property configuration
The dynamic application name looks good, but let's ensure it's properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Spring application name is properly configured
The dynamic ${spring.application.name} property in banner.txt is correctly configured in application.yml as spring.application.name: @project.artifactId@. This uses Maven property substitution to set the application name from the project's artifactId, which is a standard Spring Boot practice.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify spring.application.name is configured in application properties
rg -l "spring\.application\.name" --type yaml
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching for application.yml or application.properties files first
fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties
# Then we can examine their contents for spring configuration
Length of output: 1287
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the main application.yml and application-local.yml for the gateway
cat refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
echo "=== Local Config ==="
cat refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application-local.yml
Length of output: 2616
4-7: Verify version properties availability
The version information structure looks good and follows a consistent format. Let's verify the availability of these properties.
✅ Verification successful
All version properties are correctly configured
Based on the verification results, all version properties used in banner.txt are properly configured:
${info.application.version}is set via Maven's@project.version@property${info.build.java.version}is set via Maven's@java.version@property${spring-boot.version}is available through Spring Boot's auto-configuration (parent version 3.3.6)${info.build.spring-cloud.version}is set via Maven's@spring-cloud-dependencies.version@property
The application.yml correctly exposes these properties through the info section, and the Maven POM file defines all the necessary version properties.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all required properties are defined in pom.xml and application properties
echo "Checking for version properties in pom.xml..."
rg "info\.build\.java\.version|info\.build\.spring-cloud\.version|info\.application\.version" --type xml
echo "Checking for version properties in application properties..."
rg "info\.build\.java\.version|info\.build\.spring-cloud\.version|info\.application\.version" --type yaml
Length of output: 446
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for application properties files and their content
echo "Searching for application properties files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties
echo -e "\nChecking content of application properties files..."
for f in $(fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties); do
echo -e "\n=== Content of $f ==="
cat "$f"
done
echo -e "\nChecking pom.xml for version-related configurations..."
if [ -f "pom.xml" ]; then
echo -e "\n=== Relevant sections from pom.xml ==="
cat pom.xml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "version\|info\|properties"
fi
echo -e "\nChecking for Spring Boot configuration metadata..."
fd "spring-configuration-metadata.json|additional-spring-configuration-metadata.json"
Length of output: 19367
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the pom.xml in the gateway module specifically
echo "=== Content of refarch-gateway/pom.xml ==="
cat refarch-gateway/pom.xml | grep -A 10 -B 10 "<properties>\|<parent>\|<version>\|<artifactId>spring-cloud-dependencies\|<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent"
Length of output: 10103
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml (2)
2-2: LGTM! Verify Maven resource filtering.
The Maven property placeholder usage is correct, but ensure that Maven resource filtering is enabled in your pom.xml for the resources directory.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search specifically for the gateway project's pom.xml to verify the filtering configuration.
Maven resource filtering is properly configured ✓
Resource filtering is correctly enabled in the pom.xml with <filtering>true</filtering> for the main resources directory, which means the @project.artifactId@ placeholder will be properly resolved during the build process.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Maven resource filtering is enabled in pom.xml
rg -A 5 '<resources>' | rg -A 5 '<filtering>true</filtering>'
Length of output: 500
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Maven resource filtering in the gateway project's pom.xml
fd pom.xml --exec grep -A 10 -B 2 '<resources>' {} \; 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 448
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 2-2: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
68-68: Verify custom error handling behavior.
The map5xxto400 property appears to be a custom error handling configuration. Please ensure this behavior is documented and tested.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of the error handling behavior to fully understand how this property is used.
Let me try with ripgrep to get the implementation details.
Let me get the complete implementation of the filter method to understand the error mapping logic.
The map5xxto400 property is well implemented and documented
The property is used in a Spring Cloud Gateway global filter (GlobalBackend5xxTo400Mapper) that:
- Intercepts 5xx server errors from backend services
- Logs the error details including request ID, method, URL, and response body
- When
map5xxto400=true(default), converts 5xx responses to 400 Bad Request with a generic error message - When
map5xxto400=false, keeps the 500 Internal Server Error with a different generic message - Has corresponding test coverage in
GlobalBackend5xxTo400MapperTest
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation and usage of the custom property
rg -A 5 'map5xxto400'
Length of output: 2309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of GlobalBackend5xxTo400Mapper
ast-grep --pattern 'class GlobalBackend5xxTo400Mapper {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of the mapper class
rg -A 20 "class GlobalBackend5xxTo400Mapper"
Length of output: 6357
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete implementation of the filter method
rg -A 50 "public Mono<Void> filter" refarch-gateway/src/main/java/de/muenchen/refarch/gateway/filter/GlobalBackend5xxTo400Mapper.java
Length of output: 3169
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 68-68: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/pom.xml (1)
13-13: LGTM! Description accurately reflects the service's purpose.
The added description is concise and will be properly displayed in the banner configuration through the @project.description@ placeholder.
Let's verify the banner configuration integration:
✅ Verification successful
Description is properly integrated with banner configuration
The description added in pom.xml is correctly integrated:
- The application.yml uses
@project.description@placeholder which will be replaced with the pom.xml description - The banner.txt displays this description through
${info.application.description}property - The description content "Integration for CRUD operations on a s3 storage" accurately describes the service's purpose
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify banner configuration and description usage
# Check if banner.txt exists and uses the project.description placeholder
fd -t f "banner.txt" -x grep -l "@project.description@" {}
# Check if application.yml uses the project.description placeholder
fd -t f "application.yml" -x grep -l "description: @project.description@" {}
Length of output: 335
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of banner.txt and application.yml files to verify the integration
# Check banner.txt content
echo "=== Content of banner.txt files ==="
fd -t f "banner.txt" -x echo "=== {} ===" \; -x cat {}
# Check application.yml content for description usage
echo -e "\n=== Content of application.yml files with description ==="
rg -A 2 -B 2 "description:" ./refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml
Length of output: 2883
refarch-gateway/pom.xml (1)
28-28: LGTM! Property name change improves clarity.
The renamed property spring-cloud-dependencies.version better reflects its purpose and aligns with Maven's conventional naming pattern for BOM dependencies.
refarch-integrations/pom.xml (2)
36-36: LGTM! Property name change improves clarity
The renaming from spring-cloud.version to spring-cloud-dependencies.version follows a more descriptive naming convention while maintaining the same version value.
68-68: LGTM! Consistent property reference update
The property reference has been correctly updated to use the new property name spring-cloud-dependencies.version.
...h-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...efarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/banner.txt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...efarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/banner.txt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…tion-with-refarch-templates
devtobi
deleted the
maint/295-maintenance-align-banner-configuration-with-refarch-templates
branch
Description
Reference
Issues #295
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
refarch-s3-integration-rest-serviceproject.Bug Fixes
Documentation
banner.txtto provide more comprehensive application details and user engagement links.