-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🔧 Simplified configuration yml files #311
🔧 Simplified configuration yml files #311
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces structural modifications to several configuration files within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token (syntax) 🔇 Additional comments (4)refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml (3)Line range hint The error configuration exposes message details in all environments, which could leak sensitive information in production:
Consider:
server:
error:
- include-message: always
+ include-message: ${ERROR_INCLUDE_MESSAGE:never}
whitelabel:
enabled: false 🧰 Tools🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token (syntax)
Good changes:
Line range hint The CORS configuration uses environment variables which is good practice, but let's verify:
✅ Verification successfulCORS configuration appears to be appropriately secured The CORS configuration is well-designed and secure for the following reasons:
The documentation shows this is part of a well-architected gateway with:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for CORS-related environment variables in deployment configs
rg -l "ALLOWED_ORIGINS"
# Check for any security documentation about CORS
fd -g "*security*.{md,txt}" -t f | xargs rg -l "CORS"
Length of output: 154 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the README for any CORS configuration documentation
cat refarch-gateway/README.md
# Let's also check for any CORS-related code in the codebase
rg -A 5 -B 5 "allowedHeaders|allowCredentials|ALLOWED_ORIGINS"
Length of output: 9198 🧰 Tools🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token (syntax) refarch-gateway/src/test/java/de/muenchen/refarch/gateway/filter/GlobalRequestParameterPollutionFilterTest.java (1)
The assertion format has been updated to remove spaces in the JSON. Let's verify this matches the actual response format from the error handler. ✅ Verification successfulBased on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response: Assertion format is correct The test assertion 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for error response format configuration or implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements ErrorWebExceptionHandler {
$$$
}'
# Check for other tests that verify error responses
rg -l "isEqualTo\(HttpStatus\.BAD_REQUEST\)" -t java
Length of output: 346 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual error response format in the test files
rg "message.*parameter pollution" -A 5 -B 5 refarch-gateway/src/test/java/de/muenchen/refarch/gateway/filter/GlobalRequestParameterPollutionFilterTest.java
# Also check the implementation of error handling
fd "Global.*Filter.java" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 7348 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the ParameterPollutionException to see how the error message is formatted
rg -t java "class ParameterPollutionException" -A 10
Length of output: 714 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any global exception handlers that might format the error response
rg -t java "implements (WebExceptionHandler|ErrorWebExceptionHandler)" -A 5
Length of output: 77 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any classes that handle exceptions or error responses
rg -t java "class.*Exception.*Handler" -A 5
# Also check for any configuration related to error handling
fd "application.yml" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 3606 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range comments (5)
refarch-integrations/refarch-cosys-integration/refarch-cosys-integration-example/src/main/resources/application-example.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-19
: Consider using placeholder credentials in example configurationWhile this is an example configuration, using literal values like "local" and "client_secret" could lead to security issues if accidentally used in production. Consider using obvious placeholder values.
- client-id: local - client-secret: client_secret + client-id: YOUR_CLIENT_ID_HERE + client-secret: YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET_HERE🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 36-36: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Security Configuration Review Required
Based on the verification results, several security concerns need attention:
This appears to be an example configuration file (
application-example.yml
), but it contains hardcoded sensitive values:
- Client secrets are plaintext (
client_secret
)- Example URLs use insecure HTTP (
http://localhost:8086
)- Example domain names are used (
example.com
)No production or other environment-specific configurations were found, suggesting this example file might be used as a template.
While
enable-security: true
is correctly set, the presence of hardcoded credentials in a version-controlled example file poses a security risk.Recommendations:
- Replace hardcoded secrets with placeholders (e.g.,
${CLIENT_SECRET}
)- Document the required environment variables
- Ensure all URLs use HTTPS in non-local environments
- Create separate, secure configuration files for different environments
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-36
: Verify security settings across environmentsPlease ensure that:
- The SSO issuer URI is correctly configured for different environments
- The document-storage-url is properly secured in production
- enable-security flag is always true in non-local environments
Let me gather more information about the security configurations across different environments.
Let me check for the presence of different environment-specific configuration files and their security settings.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential security misconfigurations across yml files echo "Checking for security configurations across environments..." rg -l "enable-security:\s*(false|no|off)" --type yaml rg -l "localhost" --type yaml rg -l "example\.com" --type yamlLength of output: 1038
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of application yml files for security patterns echo "Checking application-example.yml..." rg "enable-security|client-secret|localhost|example\.com" refarch-integrations/refarch-cosys-integration/refarch-cosys-integration-example/src/main/resources/application-example.yml echo -e "\nChecking other application yml files..." fd "application.*\.yml" --type f --exec rg -l "enable-security:\s*true" {}Length of output: 971
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for different environment configurations echo "Checking for environment-specific configurations in the cosys integration..." fd "application-.*\.yml" refarch-integrations/refarch-cosys-integration/ echo -e "\nChecking content of all environment configurations..." fd "application-.*\.yml" refarch-integrations/refarch-cosys-integration/ --exec cat {}Length of output: 1624
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 36-36: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
refarch-integrations/refarch-email-integration/refarch-email-integration-java-example/src/main/resources/application-local.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-22
: Consider externalizing sensitive credentials.The configuration contains hardcoded credentials for both mail and S3 services. While this is acceptable for local development, consider:
- Using environment variables or external secret management
- Adding a comment indicating this is for local development only
- Documenting the required environment variables in README
Example approach:
spring: mail: host: localhost port: 1025 - username: [email protected] - password: secret + username: ${MAIL_USERNAME:[email protected]} + password: ${MAIL_PASSWORD:secret} server: port: 8087 refarch: s3: bucket-name: test-bucket - access-key: minio - secret-key: Test1234 + access-key: ${S3_ACCESS_KEY:minio} + secret-key: ${S3_SECRET_KEY:Test1234} url: http://localhost:9000refarch-integrations/refarch-email-integration/refarch-email-integration-rest-example/src/main/resources/application-local.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-20
: Consider using environment variables for sensitive informationEven in local development configurations, it's recommended to externalize sensitive information like credentials and secrets using environment variables or a secure vault solution.
Consider refactoring sensitive configurations like this:
spring: mail: host: localhost port: 1025 - username: [email protected] - password: secret + username: ${MAIL_USERNAME:[email protected]} + password: ${MAIL_PASSWORD:secret} security: oauth2: client: registration: s3: - client-id: local - client-secret: client_secret + client-id: ${OAUTH_CLIENT_ID:local} + client-secret: ${OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET:client_secret}refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml (1)
Line range hint
9-17
: Review CORS configuration securityThe CORS configuration uses environment variables which is good practice, but consider:
- Using more specific patterns instead of "*" for allowedHeaders
- Documenting the expected format of ALLOWED_ORIGINS_PUBLIC and ALLOWED_ORIGINS_CLIENTS
Consider refining the configuration like this:
cors-configurations: '[/public/**]': allowedOriginPatterns: ${ALLOWED_ORIGINS_PUBLIC} '[/clients/**]': allowedOriginPatterns: ${ALLOWED_ORIGINS_CLIENTS} - allowedHeaders: "*" + allowedHeaders: + - Authorization + - Content-Type + - X-Requested-With allowCredentials: true🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
(2 hunks)refarch-gateway/src/test/resources/application-test.yml
(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-cosys-integration/refarch-cosys-integration-example/src/main/resources/application-example.yml
(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-email-integration/refarch-email-integration-java-example/src/main/resources/application-local.yml
(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-email-integration/refarch-email-integration-rest-example/src/main/resources/application-local.yml
(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application-local.yml
(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
refarch-gateway/src/test/resources/application-test.yml
[error] 37-37: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
refarch-integrations/refarch-cosys-integration/refarch-cosys-integration-example/src/main/resources/application-example.yml
[error] 36-36: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application-local.yml
[error] 21-21: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml
[error] 40-40: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
refarch-gateway/src/test/resources/application-test.yml (1)
Line range hint 1-32
: Verify the SSO configuration for test environment.
The configuration uses production SSO URLs (sso.muenchen.de
) with a test realm. While this works for initializing the Spring context, it might be better to use test-specific SSO endpoints.
Let's check if there are any test-specific SSO configurations in other files:
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 37-37: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
refarch-integrations/refarch-email-integration/refarch-email-integration-java-example/src/main/resources/application-local.yml (1)
7-10
: LGTM! Clean formatting improvements.
The added blank lines improve readability by logically separating configuration sections.
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application-local.yml (2)
8-11
: LGTM! Well-structured OAuth2 configuration.
Good use of template variable for user-info-uri, maintaining DRY principles by referencing the existing issuer-uri.
13-15
: LGTM! Clear server port configuration.
The server port configuration is clearly defined and aligns with the PR's goal of simplifying configuration files.
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml (3)
23-24
: LGTM! Enhanced health monitoring.
Good addition of health probes configuration, which provides better container health monitoring capabilities.
38-44
: LGTM! Well-structured application info.
The info section is properly restored with Maven property placeholders. Note: The YAML lint warning about @
symbols can be safely ignored as these are valid Maven property placeholders.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 40-40: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
17-17
: Verify impact of removed management endpoints.
The removal of livenessstate
and readinessstate
from exposed endpoints might affect monitoring systems. Please verify that:
- These endpoints are not required by your monitoring stack
- The
health
endpoint provides sufficient monitoring capabilities
refarch-integrations/refarch-email-integration/refarch-email-integration-rest-example/src/main/resources/application-local.yml (1)
22-24
: LGTM: Server port configuration
The addition of the server port configuration is clear and follows the standard Spring Boot configuration format.
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml (2)
2-3
: LGTM: Project metadata configuration
The use of Maven property placeholders for project metadata is a good practice for maintaining consistency between pom.xml and application configuration.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
35-35
: Verify impact of removed management endpoints
The removal of livenessState
and readinessState
from exposed endpoints might affect container orchestration health checks.
Let's check if these endpoints are used in any Kubernetes configurations:
✅ Verification successful
Removal of livenessState and readinessState endpoints is safe
The changes to management endpoints are safe because:
- The
livenessState
andreadinessState
are still enabled in the configuration (management.health.livenessstate.enabled: true
andmanagement.health.readinessstate.enabled: true
) - The health endpoint is still exposed (
include: health
) - Kubernetes probes in docker-compose.yml use basic health check URLs that don't depend on these specific endpoints
- Spring Boot's
/health
endpoint automatically includes liveness and readiness information when the probes are enabled
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential health check configurations
rg -l 'livenessProbe|readinessProbe' --type yaml
Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for deployment configurations and health check patterns
fd -e yaml -e yml | xargs grep -l -i "health\|probe\|liveness\|readiness"
Length of output: 294
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of these files to understand health check configurations
echo "=== Gateway application.yml ==="
cat refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
echo -e "\n=== Docker Compose ==="
cat stack/docker-compose.yml
Length of output: 4751
...sys-integration/refarch-cosys-integration-example/src/main/resources/application-example.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...sys-integration/refarch-cosys-integration-example/src/main/resources/application-example.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...sys-integration/refarch-cosys-integration-example/src/main/resources/application-example.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntegration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application-local.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-70
: Overall configuration simplification achieved.The changes successfully simplify the configuration by:
- Removing non-essential properties (banner.location, jackson serialization)
- Maintaining a clean hierarchical structure
- Retaining critical functionality (security, management endpoints)
However, consider documenting the rationale for removing certain properties in the PR description to help with future maintenance.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
(3 hunks)refarch-gateway/src/test/java/de/muenchen/refarch/gateway/filter/GlobalRequestParameterPollutionFilterTest.java
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
refarch-gateway/src/test/java/de/muenchen/refarch/gateway/filter/GlobalRequestParameterPollutionFilterTest.java (2)
41-41
: LGTM! Enhanced security test coverage.
The improved assertion now verifies both the error message and the specific exception type, providing more thorough validation of the parameter pollution security feature.
41-41
: Verify error response format configuration.
Since the PR includes changes to error handling configuration (removal of include-exception
property), let's verify that the expected error response format remains consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Error response format is correctly configured and consistent
The verification shows that:
- The
application.yml
explicitly hasinclude-exception: true
in the server error configuration - The test assertion is consistent with this configuration as it checks for the exception class in the response
- This is the only test in the codebase that relies on exception details in the response
- The ParameterPollutionException is properly integrated in the filter and exception handling flow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check error handling configuration in application yml files
# Search for error handling related configuration
echo "Checking error handling configuration in application yml files:"
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg -l "include-exception|error|exception"
# Search for any other tests relying on error response format
echo -e "\nChecking other tests that may rely on error response format:"
rg -t java "expectBody.*contains.*exception" -g "**/*Test.java"
Length of output: 603
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the application.yml files to see error handling configuration
echo "Content of gateway application.yml:"
cat refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
# Let's also check for any error response related tests or configurations
echo -e "\nSearching for error response related patterns in tests:"
rg "assertThat.*contains.*exception|assertTrue.*contains.*exception|assertResponse.*exception" -g "**/*Test.java"
# Let's specifically look for ParameterPollutionException usage
echo -e "\nSearching for ParameterPollutionException usage:"
rg "ParameterPollutionException" --type java
Length of output: 3312
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml (2)
2-3
: LGTM! Clean hierarchical structure.
The application name configuration is properly nested under the application
section, following Spring Boot's configuration best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 3-3: syntax error: found character '@' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
36-36
: Verify health probe endpoint configuration consistency.
There appears to be a potential inconsistency:
- Health probes (
livenessstate
andreadinessstate
) are enabled in themanagement.health
section - However, these endpoints are not included in the
management.endpoints.web.exposure.include
list
This might prevent the health probe endpoints from being accessible even though they are enabled.
Let's check the Spring Boot documentation version and other services for consistent health probe configurations:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
Reference
Issues #304
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores