Fixes #262: Clarify using hasAccessToWebResource with no methods #322
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…hods Signed-off-by:Ondro Mihalyi <[email protected]>
arjantijms
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This aligns the hasAccessToWebResource Javadoc with how it was intended to work and how it's covered by the TCK tests, as clarified by @arjantijms in #266 (comment).
The
hasAccessToWebResourcemethod is intended to be aligned with the WebResourcePermission, which is already mentioned in Javadoc. It interprets an empty list of HTTP methods as "all HTTP methods". So this PR clarifies that access to all HTTP methods is required if no method is provided as an argument.