feat(agents-api): Adaptive context (via recursive summarization) #306
Conversation
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to 11ac607
- Looked at
14lines of code in1files - Took 51 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
2files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. agents-api/pyproject.toml:42:
- Assessed confidence :
66% - Grade:
0% - Comment:
The addition ofjupyterlabandipywidgetsto thedevdependencies is not mentioned in the PR description. Please clarify the need for these dependencies to ensure they are necessary for the project's development environment. - Reasoning:
The addition ofjupyterlabandipywidgetsto thedevdependencies section of thepyproject.tomlfile suggests that these packages are intended for development purposes, likely for creating or testing Jupyter notebooks. However, the PR title and description do not mention any specific use of Jupyter notebooks or a need for these dependencies. It's important to ensure that every dependency added is justified to avoid bloating the project with unnecessary packages, which can lead to longer build times and potential conflicts.
Workflow ID: wflow_LminO3ZJJVwl3Jkk
You can customize Ellipsis with review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more. See docs.
|
Skipped PR review on b14b0f7 because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please contact us and we'll fix it right away. Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on e716d90
- Looked at
9lines of code in1files - Took 53 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. /agents-api/notebooks/test-chat.json:1:
- Assessed confidence :
66% - Grade:
0% - Comment:
Ensure that the JSON structure intest-chat.jsonis correctly parsed and utilized within the application. Verify that the file's integration points (like loading and parsing mechanisms) are robust against potential JSON format errors. - Reasoning:
The JSON file added in this PR contains a conversation script for a chat simulation. It's important to ensure that the JSON structure is correct and that there are no syntax errors, as these could cause issues when the file is parsed by the application. The JSON appears to be well-formed with appropriate key-value pairs for each message role and content. However, it's crucial to check if the file is being used correctly in the context of the application, such as being properly loaded and parsed in the chat simulation environment.
Workflow ID: wflow_EPvmUyKYikz8lTUi
You can customize Ellipsis with review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more. See docs.
|
Skipped PR review on 5fb33ad because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please contact us and we'll fix it right away. Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev |
|
Skipped PR review on f40c35f because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please contact us and we'll fix it right away. Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 83803dc in 2 minutes and 19 seconds
More details
- Looked at
848lines of code in13files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%.
1. /agents-api/notebooks/rec_sum/generate.py:8:
- Assessed confidence :
66% - Grade:
0% - Comment:
Consider handling specific exceptions in the retry decorator to make retries more meaningful and efficient. For example, you might want to retry on specific exceptions like network errors or API rate limits. - Reasoning:
Thegeneratefunction ingenerate.pyuses theAsyncClientfrom theopenailibrary to create chat completions. The function is decorated with a retry mechanism from thetenacitylibrary, which is set to retry up to 5 times with a fixed wait of 2 seconds between attempts. This is a common pattern to handle potential transient issues in network calls or service availability. However, the function could be improved by handling specific exceptions that might occur during the API call, such as network errors or API rate limits, to make retries more meaningful and efficient.
Workflow ID: wflow_LDOX3DZ5icz4XLAR
You can customize Ellipsis with review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more. See docs.
|
Skipped PR review on e77381e because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please contact us and we'll fix it right away. Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on c05113f in 3 minutes and 46 seconds
More details
- Looked at
60lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_9oPGJL9pgUhJZPRs
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
c05113f to
a41a85b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on a41a85b in 3 minutes and 45 seconds
More details
- Looked at
550lines of code in8files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_0mRqc8Qby7Cvd3qN
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
a41a85b to
4925666
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 4925666 in 4 minutes and 36 seconds
More details
- Looked at
640lines of code in10files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/delete_entries.py:65
- Draft comment:
The formatting of UUIDs into the query string is incorrect. The UUIDs are being converted to strings, which may not be correctly interpreted by the database expecting UUIDs. Consider passing the UUIDs as parameters to the query without converting them to strings.
entry_ids = [id for id in entry_ids]
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 30% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_RuFLMQus3enNLbut
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
4925666 to
88aa9b2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 88aa9b2 in 4 minutes and 35 seconds
More details
- Looked at
642lines of code in10files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_rbgtRnlNrtHboCnV
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 0003f29 in 3 minutes and 49 seconds
More details
- Looked at
24lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/summarization.py:211
- Draft comment:
Ensure thatsummarization_model_nameis validated before use to confirm it corresponds to a valid model capable of performing the required tasks. This is important to prevent runtime errors due to invalid or unset model names. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_hkhTGLWRhNJ4iYxw
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 142cffe in 4 minutes and 38 seconds
More details
- Looked at
41lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/summarization.py:165
- Draft comment:
Consider removing this large commented-out block of code if it is no longer in use to keep the codebase clean and maintainable. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_geefcEwGU2rgpWMv
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 91a9e78 in 4 minutes and 12 seconds
More details
- Looked at
41lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_PgwXatFt6stiLeV7
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
|
Hey @creatorrr, founder @ellipsis-dev here. You can disable code reviews from certain branch names, such as into |
|
Sorry, I don't know how to help with that. If you tag me (@ellipsis-dev) in a comment, I can do one of these things (but not multiple at once):
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on e08dbc4 in 1 minute and 47 seconds
More details
- Looked at
65lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_ockFwLqrlzEmPTgG
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
e08dbc4 to
bb75af4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on bb75af4 in 3 minutes and 48 seconds
More details
- Looked at
65lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/summarization.py:194
- Draft comment:
Ensure thatentries_summarization_querycorrectly handles the deletion of old entries as intended, sincedelete_entries_by_ids_querywas removed. This is crucial for maintaining data integrity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_QA8XlJbZ4mNSDH6M
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 7f286dd in 2 minutes and 4 seconds
More details
- Looked at
12lines of code in1files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/pyproject.toml:33
- Draft comment:
The addition of thetenacitypackage is noted. Please ensure that this package is actually used in the project as there is no mention of its usage in the PR details. Adding unused dependencies can lead to increased maintenance and potential conflicts. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_MYaaUARDeGOPV9Wd
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on e2eec7f in 1 minute and 51 seconds
More details
- Looked at
15lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/rec_sum/trim.py:62
- Draft comment:
The PR description mentions significant changes insummarization.pyand removal of unused imports, but the diff provided only shows changes intrim.py. Please ensure that the PR description accurately reflects the changes made or update the PR to include all intended changes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_fTyPji3ml0fWfdyh
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 2dfbe42 in 1 minute and 46 seconds
More details
- Looked at
16lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/rec_sum/summarize.py:77
- Draft comment:
The PR description mentions significant refactoring of thesummarizationfunction, but the diff provided does not reflect these changes. Please ensure that the correct files and changes are included in the PR. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_ATteQakeBuEjcyZe
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
2dfbe42 to
cee49d7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on cee49d7 in 2 minutes and 36 seconds
More details
- Looked at
16lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/rec_sum/summarize.py:77
- Draft comment:
The retry strategy here stops after only 2 attempts. Consider using a more robust retry strategy, possibly with a combination ofstop_after_attemptandwait_fixedorwait_random_exponentialto handle transient errors more effectively. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_2Hsm7G0goJky6624
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9bb40bb in 2 minutes and 20 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/summarization.py:190
- Draft comment:
The PR description mentions the addition of retry capabilities usingtenacity, but there is no implementation of this in the provided code. Please ensure that the retry logic is implemented as described or update the PR description if it was included by mistake. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_KxCwe2sz6XVPV770
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on f38bf3e in 2 minutes and 27 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/delete_entries.py:90
- Draft comment:
The query operation:rm entriesis not recognized in standard SQL. Please ensure that this is the correct syntax for the database query language being used. If this is intended for an SQL database, it should be replaced with the correct SQL DELETE operation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_HvqehyirJsrkPWdN
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on d313315 in 2 minutes and 42 seconds
More details
- Looked at
50lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/delete_entries.py:83
- Draft comment:
The usage ofto_uuidfunction here seems incorrect as it is typically used to convert a string to a UUID, not the other way around. If the intent is to ensure the UUIDs are in string format for the query, you should directly convert them to strings withoutto_uuid.
f'"{str(e.id)}"',
f'"{str(e.session_id)}"',
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_o6BCWzvQDvpIZM25
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9b58614 in 4 minutes and 14 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/delete_entries.py:76
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the database schema and operations can handleNonevalues for thenamefield appropriately to avoid potential issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_YYR50Hkudir3RJ7s
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 08f6295 in 1 minute and 21 seconds
More details
- Looked at
124lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_TZZ72Ux8Buf72cMn
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8f8b604 in 1 minute and 58 seconds
More details
- Looked at
10lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/delete_entries.py:115
- Draft comment:
The query uses$entry_keyswhich is not defined or replaced in the function. This will cause the query to fail as the actualentry_idsare not being passed correctly. Consider replacing$entry_keyswith the correct placeholder and ensure it is properly formatted in the query parameters.
return (query, {'entry_keys': [str(id) for id in entry_ids]})
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 20% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_dycNRCsSyCJSbcZf
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9f74d34 in 1 minute and 33 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/delete_entries.py:70
- Draft comment:
The change from$entry_keysto$entry_idsin the query is correct and aligns with the dictionary key used in the return statement. This ensures that the variable names are consistent and correctly reference the passed UUIDs for deletion. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The PR description mentions fixing list handling indelete_entriesto properly handle UUIDs and robust role handling. However, the change in the diff seems incorrect. The variable name in the query should match the key in the dictionary passed to the query. The original code usedentry_keysin the query, but the dictionary key was not shown. The change toentry_idsin the query should correspond to the dictionary key, which is correctly shown in the return statement asentry_ids. This suggests that the change in the query is correct and aligns with the dictionary key used in the return statement.
Workflow ID: wflow_1w4lcqkN9TYHwuKi
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 97d265d in 1 minute and 38 seconds
More details
- Looked at
10lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_gviMm647r7Q6RvzU
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 2c4ceb6 in 2 minutes and 44 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/summarization.py:212
- Draft comment:
The change in indexing forold_entry_idsmight introduce an off-by-one error. If the indices inmsg["summarizes"]are 0-based, the original indexing method should be used to avoid accessing incorrect or non-existent entries. Please verify the expected index base formsg["summarizes"]and adjust accordingly.
UUID(entries[idx]["entry_id"], version=4)
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence of 40% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
Workflow ID: wflow_p7GGvJsDNU2TJyBg
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on ddbf7d0 in 3 minutes and 17 seconds
More details
- Looked at
15lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_aH8DZKOCRK4Betav
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on cde5055 in 1 minute and 41 seconds
More details
- Looked at
42lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_fSVzh65rSZQIgppm
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
cde5055 to
0ddc271
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 0ddc271 in 1 minute and 58 seconds
More details
- Looked at
30lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_A3NlWLkOVX0gwmhe
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
0ddc271 to
8fc6ad6
Compare
whiterabbit1983
force-pushed
the
f/rec-sum-experiments
branch
from
8fc6ad6 to
9a4935a
Compare
Closes #328
Summary:
This PR enhances the
agents-apiby improving session management, message summarization, introducing new features, and updating the OpenAPI model.Key points:
agents-apiby improving session management, message summarization, and introducing new features likeTruncationWorkflow, along with updates to the OpenAPI model and session handling logic.summarize_messagesinsummarization.pyfor efficiency.token_budgetandcontext_overflowfor dynamic session management.Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev