Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add doc IDs to the session chat response #331

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

whiterabbit1983
Copy link
Contributor

@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 commented May 9, 2024

🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit c93ef10

Summary:

Enhances data traceability in chat interactions by introducing document IDs (agent_doc_id and user_doc_id) to the session chat response.

Key points:

  • Added DocIds model to openapi_model.py to include document IDs in chat responses.
  • Modified proc_mem_context_query in proc_mem_context.py to fetch and pass document IDs including agent_doc_id and user_doc_id.
  • Updated session_chat in routers.py to handle document IDs in the chat response.
  • Adjusted session handling in session.py to include document IDs in the response setup.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to df92ef6 in 3 minutes and 0 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 320 lines of code in 5 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/autogen/openapi_model.py:819
  • Draft comment:
    The DocIds model is correctly defined with required fields agent_doc_ids and user_doc_ids as lists of strings. This aligns with the PR's goal to include document IDs in the session chat response.
  • Reason this comment was not posted::
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The PR adds document IDs to the session chat response. The changes involve modifications in the data model, session handling, and API response formatting. The main files affected are the openapi_model.py, proc_mem_context.py, routers.py, and session.py. The changes seem to align with the intended functionality of including document IDs in the chat response. However, it's crucial to ensure that the implementation correctly handles the data throughout the process, from fetching the document IDs to including them in the API response.
2. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:178
  • Draft comment:
    The modifications to include agent_doc_id and user_doc_id in the query results are correctly implemented. These changes are essential for capturing the document IDs related to the session's context, which are then passed to the API response.
  • Reason this comment was not posted::
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The changes in the proc_mem_context_query function in proc_mem_context.py are crucial as they involve fetching and handling the document IDs (agent_doc_id and user_doc_id). These IDs are extracted from the query results and are essential for tracking the documents related to the agents and users in the session context. It's important to ensure that these IDs are correctly fetched and passed through the system to be included in the final API response.
3. agents-api/agents_api/routers/sessions/routers.py:313
  • Draft comment:
    The inclusion of doc_ids in the API response is correctly implemented here. This ensures that the document IDs are returned as part of the session chat response, aligning with the PR's objectives.
  • Reason this comment was not posted::
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The changes in the session_chat function in routers.py are critical as they handle the API endpoint's response. The function now includes doc_ids in the response, which is a key part of the PR's functionality. It's important to ensure that these document IDs are correctly included in the response and that the API endpoint behaves as expected.
4. agents-api/agents_api/routers/sessions/session.py:183
  • Draft comment:
    The handling of doc_ids throughout the session's execution and their inclusion in the return statement of the run method are correctly implemented. This ensures that the document IDs are properly passed through the session logic and included in the final API response.
  • Reason this comment was not posted::
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The changes in the run method of the RecursiveSummarizationSession class in session.py are crucial as they handle the session's execution logic, including fetching document IDs and including them in the session response. It's important to ensure that the document IDs are correctly handled throughout the session's lifecycle and included in the final response.

Workflow ID: wflow_cWTR2I7qseypeWa9


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 3d2231b in 3 minutes and 7 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 319 lines of code in 5 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. /agents-api/agents_api/autogen/openapi_model.py:819
  • Draft comment:
    The DocIds model defines agent_doc_ids and user_doc_ids as lists of strings, but document IDs are typically UUIDs. Consider changing the type to List[UUID] to ensure type consistency across the application.
agent_doc_ids: List[UUID]
user_doc_ids: List[UUID]
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 50% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_pDmNcdkaDoN9g6t0


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on a4b2f56 in 1 minute and 57 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 37 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_il4fyYMiHXz5yb5m


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a997357 in 1 minute and 28 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 37 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:178
  • Draft comment:
    The tuple pattern incorrectly includes both agent_doc_id and user_doc_id for agent documents. This should be corrected to only include agent_doc_id.
        ?[role, name, content, token_count, created_at, index, agent_doc_id] :=
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
2. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:205
  • Draft comment:
    The tuple pattern incorrectly includes both user_doc_id and agent_doc_id for user documents. This should be corrected to only include user_doc_id.
        ?[role, name, content, token_count, created_at, index, user_doc_id] :=
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 30% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_08cZV5GTNvvPlxmT


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on ff12a6b in 3 minutes and 8 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 37 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:178
  • Draft comment:
    The tuple unpacking for agent and user documents incorrectly includes both agent_doc_id and user_doc_id. Each document type should only include its respective document ID to avoid confusion and potential data handling errors. Here's a corrected version for agent documents:
        ?[role, name, content, token_count, created_at, index, agent_doc_id] :=

And ensure to apply a similar correction for user documents on line 205.

  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_Qp2AXVjxrPkyKaMA


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 5ea1ac0 in 2 minutes and 50 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 22 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:186
  • Draft comment:
    Renaming doc_id to agent_doc_id and user_doc_id directly in the query might cause issues if other parts of the system expect a doc_id field. Consider keeping the original doc_id and handling the differentiation in the application logic if necessary.
                doc_id,
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_yZjYrvPnJevavMob


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on c18f91a in 2 minutes and 13 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 83 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:172
  • Draft comment:
    The modifications to include agent_doc_id and user_doc_id in the session chat response are correctly implemented in the proc_mem_context_query function. The function now handles these IDs appropriately by using separate temporary tables for agent and user documents, which aligns with the PR's goal of enhancing data traceability.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The PR description mentions the addition of agent_doc_id and user_doc_id to the session chat response. The changes in the proc_mem_context_query function reflect this by modifying the query to fetch and handle these document IDs. The function now includes separate temporary tables for agent and user documents (_agent_docs and _user_docs), and the query sections have been adjusted to populate these tables with the respective document IDs. This is a logical extension of the existing functionality to include document IDs in the chat response, enhancing data traceability as described in the PR summary.

Workflow ID: wflow_0foaUiYjXcXNB1JT


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on c93ef10 in 3 minutes and 15 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 83 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:172
  • Draft comment:
    The changes to include agent_doc_id and user_doc_id in the query results are crucial for the feature. However, ensure that these IDs are correctly handled in all parts of the query to maintain data consistency and avoid any potential data mismatches or errors.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.
2. agents-api/agents_api/models/entry/proc_mem_context.py:12
  • Draft comment:
    The change in the k_docs parameter from 2 to 3 should be validated for its impact on performance and relevance of the query results. Ensure that this adjustment aligns with the intended enhancements and does not introduce inefficiencies.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_ZUifjVYXWZE7LKic


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 merged commit 1355341 into dev May 16, 2024
11 checks passed
@whiterabbit1983 whiterabbit1983 deleted the f/return-doc-ids branch May 16, 2024 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant