fix(agents-api): Fix task execution logical errors

[creatorrr]

Signed-off-by: Diwank Singh Tomer [email protected]

---

🚀	This description was created by Ellipsis for commit cde3f73

Summary:

This PR refines task execution logic, updates transition handling, enhances test coverage, and adds a YAML file for testing data extraction.

Key points:

• Refines task execution logic in base_evaluate.py, transition_step.py, and agents-api/agents_api/workflows/task_execution/__init__.py.
• Updates transition_step to handle exceptions and use create_execution_transition.
• Enhances valid_transitions and valid_previous_statuses with new states finish and finish_branch in tasks.py.
• Refactors TaskExecutionWorkflow.run for improved transition handling.
• Adds test_execution_started fixture for testing started executions.
• Updates tests in test_execution_workflow.py and test_task_routes.py to cover new transition logic.
• Comments out failing tests related to execution transitions and patching execution status.
• Adds simple_parameter_extractor.yaml for testing data extraction from screenshots.

---

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to b6f9116 in 30 seconds

More details

• Looked at 561 lines of code in 7 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/agents_api/clients/cozo.py:13

• Draft comment:
  Consider defining the options dictionary inside the get_cozo_client function to ensure it is always initialized correctly and to avoid potential side effects from external modifications.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The function get_cozo_client in agents_api/clients/cozo.py is returning a Client object, but it is not clear if the Client is properly initialized with the options. The options dictionary is defined outside the function, which might lead to unexpected behavior if options is modified elsewhere in the code. It would be better to define options inside the function to ensure it is always initialized correctly.

2. agents-api/agents_api/common/protocol/tasks.py:60

• Draft comment:
  Avoid using type: ignore without a specific reason. Consider addressing the typing issues directly or provide a more specific reason for ignoring the type check.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In agents_api/common/protocol/tasks.py, the valid_transitions dictionary is defined with a type: ignore comment. This might hide potential type errors. It's better to address the typing issues directly or provide a more specific reason for ignoring the type check.

3. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/task_execution/__init__.py:83

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a default case in the match-case statement to handle unexpected scenarios and ensure all possible cases are covered.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In agents_api/workflows/task_execution/__init__.py, the transition function uses a match-case statement to determine the transition type based on the context. However, the match-case statement does not handle all possible cases explicitly, which might lead to unexpected behavior if new cases are added in the future. Consider adding a default case to handle unexpected scenarios.

4. agents-api/tests/fixtures.py:308

• Draft comment:
  Ensure that the init transition logic in test_execution_started is consistent with the transition validation rules, as init transitions typically do not have a next step.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In agents_api/tests/fixtures.py, the test_execution_started fixture creates a transition with type="init" and next set to the same as current. This might not align with the intended logic of the transition system, where init transitions typically do not have a next step. Ensure this logic is correct and consistent with the transition validation rules.

Workflow ID: wflow_ClibVPffX61Y31cL

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 7b306e5 in 45 seconds

More details

• Looked at 257 lines of code in 5 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/agents_api/common/protocol/tasks.py:73

• Draft comment:
  The transition from wait to error has been removed. Ensure this change aligns with the intended workflow logic.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The valid_transitions dictionary in tasks.py has a transition from wait to error removed. This might be intentional, but it's worth noting in case it affects the workflow logic.

2. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/task_execution/__init__.py:150

• Draft comment:
  Consider making the schedule_to_close_timeout configurable instead of hardcoding it to 2 seconds. This will allow flexibility for different operations that might require more time.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is about a hardcoded value in the transition function, which is part of the diff. Making the timeout configurable could be a valid suggestion for improving code flexibility. The comment is actionable and related to a change in the diff.
  The comment might be considered speculative since it suggests a change without identifying a specific issue. However, it is a reasonable suggestion for code improvement.
  The suggestion is practical and could enhance the code's flexibility, making it a valid comment to keep.
  The comment should be kept as it suggests a practical improvement related to the changes in the diff.

3. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/task_execution/__init__.py:156

• Draft comment:
  The metadata parameter is passed as an empty dictionary. If not used, consider removing it or adding a comment to explain its intended use.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 30%
  In the run method of TaskExecutionWorkflow, the transition function is called with an empty metadata dictionary. If metadata is not used, it might be better to remove it or add a comment explaining its purpose.

Workflow ID: wflow_Dxz5iX2bTjlOFskT

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on e8dff62 in 24 seconds

More details

• Looked at 106 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/tests/test_task_routes.py:125

• Draft comment:
  The test is commented out due to a failure. Consider investigating the root cause of the failure and fixing the test or the underlying issue.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The commented-out tests indicate that there are known issues with the test cases. It's important to address these issues or provide more context on why they are failing.

2. agents-api/tests/test_task_routes.py:170

• Draft comment:
  The test is commented out due to a failure. Consider investigating the root cause of the failure and fixing the test or the underlying issue.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The commented-out tests indicate that there are known issues with the test cases. It's important to address these issues or provide more context on why they are failing.

Workflow ID: wflow_tHSrF19NzmJuZD6Y

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 052b5d4 in 11 seconds

More details

• Looked at 42 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/tests/sample_tasks/simple_parameter_extractor.yaml:34

• Draft comment:
  Add a newline at the end of the file for better compatibility with various text editors and tools.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 10%
  The YAML file seems to be missing a newline at the end, which is a common best practice for text files.

Workflow ID: wflow_e3sHeAsnri7bWZwX

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 2e3797c in 48 seconds

More details

• Looked at 756 lines of code in 18 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 7 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/agents_api/activities/utils.py:24

• Draft comment:
  Consider using yaml.safe_load instead of yaml.load for better clarity and consistency with best practices.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The use of yaml.load with CSafeLoader is safe, but it's better to use yaml.safe_load for clarity and consistency with best practices.

2. agents-api/agents_api/activities/task_steps/transition_step.py:22

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding exception handling around create_execution_transition to manage potential errors during execution transitions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the removal of exception handling. This makes it relevant to the changes. However, the comment is somewhat speculative, as it suggests adding exception handling without a clear indication that it is necessary. The removal of exception handling might have been intentional, and without more context, it's hard to say if re-adding it is required.
  I might be missing the context of why the exception handling was removed. It could be that the function is now guaranteed not to throw exceptions, or that exceptions are handled elsewhere.
  Without additional context, it's difficult to determine the necessity of exception handling. However, the comment is relevant to the changes made, so it might be worth considering.
  Keep the comment as it is relevant to the changes made in the diff, but note that it is somewhat speculative.

3. agents-api/agents_api/worker/codec.py:41

• Draft comment:
  Consider enabling the type check once Temporal's codec issues are resolved to ensure type safety.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 30%
  The from_payload_data function in codec.py has commented-out code for type checking. This should be addressed once the Temporal codec issues are resolved.

4. agents-api/agents_api/worker/codec.py:55

• Draft comment:
  Consider enabling the type check once Temporal's codec issues are resolved to ensure type safety.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 30%
  The from_payload_data function in codec.py has commented-out code for type checking. This should be addressed once the Temporal codec issues are resolved.

5. agents-api/agents_api/routers/tasks/create_or_update_task.py:31

• Draft comment:
  Investigate and resolve the subtle bug that prevents task execution from tasks created via this endpoint.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is directly related to a FIXME comment added in the diff, which indicates a known issue. It is actionable as it suggests resolving a specific bug. This aligns with the rules for keeping comments that suggest actionable code quality refactors or bug fixes.
  The comment might be considered redundant since the FIXME comment already highlights the issue. However, it reinforces the need to address the bug, which could be useful for prioritization.
  Reinforcing the need to address a known issue can be beneficial, especially if it helps prioritize bug fixes. The comment is not purely informative but suggests a necessary action.
  Keep the comment as it is directly related to a change in the diff and suggests an actionable step to resolve a known issue.

6. agents-api/agents_api/routers/tasks/create_task.py:26

• Draft comment:
  Implement validation for Jinja templates to ensure template correctness.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is directly related to a TODO added in the diff, suggesting a specific action to be taken. It is actionable and relevant to the changes made, as it addresses a potential code quality improvement that has not yet been implemented.
  The comment might be considered redundant since the TODO already indicates the need for validation. However, it does provide a clear directive to implement the validation, which could be useful.
  While the TODO comment already exists, the additional comment reinforces the need for action and specifies the type of validation required, which can be helpful for clarity.
  The comment should be kept as it is directly related to a change in the diff and provides a clear, actionable suggestion for improving code quality.

7. agents-api/agents_api/routers/tasks/stream_transitions_events.py:20

• Draft comment:
  Add support for page tokens to enhance the functionality of streaming transition events.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The stream_transitions_events function in stream_transitions_events.py has a FIXME comment about adding support for page tokens. This should be addressed to enhance functionality.

Workflow ID: wflow_rSfwiS1wb9ySUE8P

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on cde3f73 in 26 seconds

More details

• Looked at 162 lines of code in 4 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/task_execution/__init__.py:479

• Draft comment:
  Consider handling the exception more explicitly or propagating it to ensure that the system can respond appropriately. Silent logging of exceptions can lead to undetected issues.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is relevant to the changes made in the diff, as it addresses the handling of exceptions in the newly added or modified code. The code does raise an ApplicationError after logging, which is a form of exception propagation, but the comment suggests a more explicit handling. This could be considered a valid suggestion for code quality improvement.
  The comment might be considered redundant since the code already raises an ApplicationError, which is a standard way to propagate exceptions. The suggestion for more explicit handling might not be necessary unless there's a specific reason to handle exceptions differently.
  While the code does propagate exceptions by raising an ApplicationError, the comment could be suggesting a more nuanced handling of exceptions, which might improve code quality or error handling robustness.
  The comment is relevant to the changes and suggests a potential improvement in exception handling. It should be kept as it provides a valid point for consideration.

2. agents-api/agents_api/workflows/task_execution/__init__.py:518

• Draft comment:
  Consider handling the exception more explicitly or propagating it to ensure that the system can respond appropriately. Silent logging of exceptions can lead to undetected issues.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

Workflow ID: wflow_sdZdLJ95ccXna6WQ

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.