feat(integrations-service): Add Browserbase provider #776
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hey @creatorrr, here is an example of how you can ask me to improve this pull request: @Sweep Add unit tests for the Browserbase models in `browserbase.py` to verify proper validation of: 📖 For more information on how to use Sweep, please read our documentation. |
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 9d8bbc0 in 14 seconds
More details
- Looked at
270lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. integrations-service/integrations/models/browserbase.py:41
- Draft comment:
BrowserbaseCreateSessionOutput,BrowserbaseGetSessionOutput, andBrowserbaseUpdateSessionOutputhave identical fields. Consider creating a base class to reduce redundancy. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The data models forBrowserbaseCreateSessionOutput,BrowserbaseGetSessionOutput, andBrowserbaseUpdateSessionOutputare identical. This redundancy can be reduced by using a base class.
Workflow ID: wflow_RorKWtvXqblfZCXg
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 97deb72 in 42 seconds
More details
- Looked at
1054lines of code in8files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/autogen/Tools.py:344
- Draft comment:
TheBrowserbaseContextArgumentsandBrowserbaseContextArgumentsUpdateclasses are duplicated in bothagents-apiandintegrations-service. Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication and adhere to the DRY principle. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The comment is about the repeated code for BrowserbaseContextArguments and BrowserbaseContextArgumentsUpdate classes in both agents-api and integrations-service. This violates the DRY principle.
2. agents-api/agents_api/autogen/Tools.py:354
- Draft comment:
TheBrowserbaseCreateSessionArgumentsandBrowserbaseCreateSessionArgumentsUpdateclasses are duplicated in bothagents-apiandintegrations-service. Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication and adhere to the DRY principle. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The comment is about the repeated code for BrowserbaseCreateSessionArguments and BrowserbaseCreateSessionArgumentsUpdate classes in both agents-api and integrations-service. This violates the DRY principle.
3. agents-api/agents_api/autogen/Tools.py:408
- Draft comment:
TheBrowserbaseExtensionArgumentsandBrowserbaseExtensionArgumentsUpdateclasses are duplicated in bothagents-apiandintegrations-service. Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication and adhere to the DRY principle. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The comment is about the repeated code for BrowserbaseExtensionArguments and BrowserbaseExtensionArgumentsUpdate classes in both agents-api and integrations-service. This violates the DRY principle.
4. integrations-service/integrations/autogen/Tools.py:344
- Draft comment:
TheBrowserbaseContextArgumentsandBrowserbaseContextArgumentsUpdateclasses are duplicated in bothagents-apiandintegrations-service. Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication and adhere to the DRY principle. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The comment is about the repeated code for BrowserbaseContextArguments and BrowserbaseContextArgumentsUpdate classes in both agents-api and integrations-service. This violates the DRY principle.
5. integrations-service/integrations/autogen/Tools.py:354
- Draft comment:
TheBrowserbaseCreateSessionArgumentsandBrowserbaseCreateSessionArgumentsUpdateclasses are duplicated in bothagents-apiandintegrations-service. Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication and adhere to the DRY principle. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The comment is about the repeated code for BrowserbaseCreateSessionArguments and BrowserbaseCreateSessionArgumentsUpdate classes in both agents-api and integrations-service. This violates the DRY principle.
6. integrations-service/integrations/autogen/Tools.py:408
- Draft comment:
TheBrowserbaseExtensionArgumentsandBrowserbaseExtensionArgumentsUpdateclasses are duplicated in bothagents-apiandintegrations-service. Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication and adhere to the DRY principle. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The comment is about the repeated code for BrowserbaseExtensionArguments and BrowserbaseExtensionArgumentsUpdate classes in both agents-api and integrations-service. This violates the DRY principle.
Workflow ID: wflow_YiB5WvPdj5DoxBzP
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 2c0a2f9 in 44 seconds
More details
- Looked at
765lines of code in6files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. integrations-service/integrations/autogen/Tools.py:1010
- Draft comment:
Specify the type of elements in thecoordinatelist for clarity and type safety. For example, useList[Tuple[int, int]]if it represents coordinates. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_52ctE3wEoJXa8mUS
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 1a576a5 in 34 seconds
More details
- Looked at
462lines of code in8files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. integrations-service/integrations/autogen/Tools.py:1115
- Draft comment:
For better compatibility with Python 3.9 and earlier, consider usingOptional[int]instead ofint | Nonefor optional integer fields. This applies to other similar instances in this file as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_lq6JDZ3d8bOXis4p
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
creatorrr
force-pushed
the
f/browserbase-integration
branch
from
1a576a5 to
f3facf0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on f3facf0 in 38 seconds
More details
- Looked at
470lines of code in8files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/remote_browser.py:166
- Draft comment:
Handle the case wherebounding_box()returnsNoneto avoid potential errors if the element is not visible or detached.
if box is not None:
return (box["x"], box["y"])
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is relevant because it points out a potential issue in the code wherebounding_box()could returnNone, leading to an error. This is a valid concern as the current implementation does not handle this case, and it could cause runtime errors if the element is not visible or detached. The comment is actionable as it suggests handling this specific case to avoid potential errors.
I might be overestimating the likelihood ofbounding_box()returningNoneand the impact it could have. It's possible that the current implementation is sufficient for the intended use cases.
Even if the likelihood is low, handling the case wherebounding_box()returnsNonewould make the code more robust and prevent potential runtime errors.
The comment is relevant and suggests a necessary code change to handle a potential issue. It should be kept as it points out a valid concern that could lead to errors.
2. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/remote_browser.py:246
- Draft comment:
Validatecoordinateandtextparameters before using them to avoid potentialTypeError.
if "coordinate" in actions[action].keywords and coordinate is None:
raise ValueError(f"Action {action} requires a coordinate.")
if "text" in actions[action].keywords and text is None:
raise ValueError(f"Action {action} requires text.")
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is suggesting a code change to validate parameters, which is a valid concern for preventing potential errors. However, the existing try-except block might already handle such errors, making the comment less critical. The comment does not provide specific validation logic, which makes it less actionable.
The try-except block might not specifically handleTypeError, and pre-validation could prevent unnecessary execution. However, without specific validation logic, the comment is not very actionable.
While the try-except block handles exceptions, pre-validation could improve code robustness. The comment could be more useful if it suggested specific validation logic.
The comment is somewhat useful as it suggests a potential improvement in parameter validation, but it lacks specificity. It should be kept with a low confidence score.
Workflow ID: wflow_imM9WClvfrHFGw0A
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them. 🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on e607737 in 47 seconds
More details
- Looked at
1560lines of code in10files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. integrations-service/integrations/providers.py:11
- Draft comment:
Remove the unused importBrowserbaseUpdateSessionArgumentsas it is no longer needed after the refactor toBrowserbaseCompleteSessionArguments. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment correctly identifies thatBrowserbaseUpdateSessionArgumentsis no longer used and suggests its removal, which aligns with the changes made in the diff. The import was indeed removed, so the comment is accurate and relevant to the changes made.
The comment might be redundant if the import was already removed in the diff, as it seems to be stating the obvious. However, it does confirm that the removal was intentional and correct.
Even if the import was removed, the comment serves as a confirmation that the removal was appropriate and aligns with the refactor.
The comment is correct and useful as it confirms the removal of an unused import, which aligns with the changes made in the diff.
2. integrations-service/integrations/providers.py:27
- Draft comment:
Remove the unused importBrowserbaseUpdateSessionOutputas it is no longer needed after the refactor toBrowserbaseCompleteSessionOutput. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
Workflow ID: wflow_Y9VqH1U4zOy3y1Vy
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
|
Typecheck errors need to be fixed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on cf7131d in 12 seconds
More details
- Looked at
25lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_g4na3rnw1K9OV9oi
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
HamadaSalhab
force-pushed
the
f/browserbase-integration
branch
from
cf7131d to
e0d9137
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on e0d9137 in 18 seconds
More details
- Looked at
3063lines of code in18files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. agents-api/agents_api/common/exceptions/tasks.py:164
- Draft comment:
The use ofcasthere is unnecessary sinceisinstancealready ensures the type. Consider removing thecastfor clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The code usescastfromtypingto cast exceptions, which is unnecessary since the type is already checked usingisinstance. This is a minor issue but should be addressed for code clarity.
2. agents-api/agents_api/common/exceptions/tasks.py:168
- Draft comment:
The use ofcasthere is unnecessary sinceisinstancealready ensures the type. Consider removing thecastfor clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The code usescastfromtypingto cast exceptions, which is unnecessary since the type is already checked usingisinstance. This is a minor issue but should be addressed for code clarity.
Workflow ID: wflow_vTAdsaEd84EbatOM
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Adds
Browserbaseprovider andRemoteBrowserintegration with session management and remote actions to the integrations service.Browserbaseprovider inproviders.pywith session management methods:list,create,get,complete, andget_live_urls.RemoteBrowserintegration inproviders.pywith actions likekey,type,mouse_move, etc.browserbase.pyfor session outputs andremote_browser.pyfor action results.__init__.pyto include new Browserbase models.selenium,playwright,httpx, andpillowtopyproject.toml.BrowserbaseandRemoteBrowserintegration methods incontexts.tsp,extensions.tsp,main.tsp,sessions.tsp, andremote_browser.tsp.This description was created by
for e0d9137. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.