-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: enable clippy::trivially_copy_pass_by_ref
lint and address it
#6724
Merged
SanchithHegde
merged 7 commits into
main
from
introduce-and-address-clippy-trivially-copy-pass-by-ref-lint
Dec 5, 2024
Merged
chore: enable clippy::trivially_copy_pass_by_ref
lint and address it
#6724
SanchithHegde
merged 7 commits into
main
from
introduce-and-address-clippy-trivially-copy-pass-by-ref-lint
Dec 5, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SanchithHegde
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: This PR has been implemented and needs to be reviewed
C-refactor
Category: Refactor
labels
Dec 2, 2024
SanchithHegde
requested review from
jarnura,
Chethan-rao,
tsdk02,
ThisIsMani and
srujanchikke
December 2, 2024 19:16
…ad of within attribute
srujanchikke
previously approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
ShankarSinghC
previously approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Won't this cause memory spike ? |
ShivanshMathurJuspay
previously approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
ThisIsMani
previously approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dashboard specific changes looks fine.
jarnura
previously approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
Dec 4, 2024
SanchithHegde
dismissed stale reviews from ShankarSinghC, ShivanshMathurJuspay, srujanchikke, and ThisIsMani
via
December 5, 2024 09:13
14c3122
ThisIsMani
previously approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
ShankarSinghC
previously approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
srujanchikke
previously approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
jarnura
previously approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
ShivanshMathurJuspay
previously approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
SanchithHegde
dismissed stale reviews from ShivanshMathurJuspay, jarnura, srujanchikke, ShankarSinghC, and ThisIsMani
via
December 5, 2024 12:51
df306cb
ShankarSinghC
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
ThisIsMani
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
srujanchikke
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
ShivanshMathurJuspay
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
jarnura
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
SanchithHegde
deleted the
introduce-and-address-clippy-trivially-copy-pass-by-ref-lint
branch
December 5, 2024 15:09
SanchithHegde
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: This PR has been implemented and needs to be reviewed
label
Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type of Change
Description
This PR enables and addresses the
trivially_copy_pass_by_ref
clippy lint. The lint helps identify places in code where types which implement theCopy
trait are passed by reference, while it would be cheaper to pass them by value instead. In our case, most of these are enums, which are only 1 or 2 bytes. A similar reasoning applies toOption<T>
parameters whereT: Copy
.Note that the lint only identifies function parameters, but not fields in structs. For instance, some of our Kafka-related types, say
KafkaRefund
, still have fields that hold references to bools and enums which implementCopy
.Motivation and Context
The lint helps identify places in code where types which implement the
Copy
trait are passed by reference, while it would be cheaper to pass them by value instead.How did you test it?
I'd expect this PR to have no behavior changes, all our existing CI checks should pass, as before.
Checklist
cargo +nightly fmt --all
cargo clippy