-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uncommenting Bool #42
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #42 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.37% 85.82% -2.56%
==========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 387 402 +15
==========================================
+ Hits 342 345 +3
- Misses 45 57 +12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@dstarkenburg can you bump the patch version? |
I don't think Python's datatypes have anything to do with it since ONNXRunTime is implemented in C++. But combining https://github.com/onnx/onnx/blob/6fab903f0b25eedb5a9d74c47ab095ee97eef0a6/onnx/onnx.proto3#L618 and the discussion in microsoft/onnxruntime#3689, it seems safe to assume that Boolean tensors should use one byte per element, which Julia's
|
Co-authored-by: Jan Weidner <[email protected]>
Let me know if that is what you meant by 'bump the patch!' (I have very little experience with github releases) |
Uncommenting Bool and converting Python's Bool datatype directly to Bool in julia does not seem to cause any issues and actually made the onnx layer 'And' load correctly (at least without broadcasting, but that part is on me).