Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inline manifestsSaver #5063

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

twz123
Copy link
Member

@twz123 twz123 commented Oct 2, 2024

Description

This makes the components more self-contained and gives them more control over the contents of the directories. Also, the FsManifestsSaver did not use the ManifestsDir configuration field.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Manual test
  • Auto test added

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • My commit messages are signed-off
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

@twz123 twz123 changed the title Inline manifestSsaver Inline manifestsSaver Oct 2, 2024
@twz123 twz123 marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2024 11:18
@twz123 twz123 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2024 11:18
@twz123 twz123 requested review from ncopa and makhov October 2, 2024 11:18
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has merge conflicts that need to be resolved.

@twz123 twz123 force-pushed the inline-manifestssaver branch from 456ebdb to ad3fd24 Compare October 31, 2024 10:17
@twz123 twz123 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2024 10:17
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has merge conflicts that need to be resolved.

Copy link
Contributor

The PR is marked as stale since no activity has been recorded in 30 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 14, 2024
@twz123 twz123 removed the Stale label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

The PR is marked as stale since no activity has been recorded in 30 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jan 15, 2025
The manifestSaver abstraction was not serving any special purpose for
the CRDs. Inlining it makes the code more straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wieczorek <[email protected]>
Adjust the tests to use temporary directories and let them call all the
lifecycle methods.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wieczorek <[email protected]>
The manifestSaver abstraction was not serving any special purpose.
Inlining it makes the code more straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wieczorek <[email protected]>
Adjust the tests to use temporary directories and let them call all the
lifecycle methods.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wieczorek <[email protected]>
The manifestSaver abstraction was not serving any special purpose.
Inlining it makes the code more straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wieczorek <[email protected]>
Its functionality has been inlined into the components.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wieczorek <[email protected]>
@twz123 twz123 force-pushed the inline-manifestssaver branch from cd903c0 to 1c33f9e Compare January 16, 2025 08:59
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant