Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update vite.config.ts #7

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update vite.config.ts #7

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

NxPKG
Copy link
Contributor

@NxPKG NxPKG commented Dec 3, 2024

User description

Notes for Reviewers

This PR fixes #

Signed commits

  • Yes, I signed my commits.

PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Added v3_lazyRouteDiscovery to the future configuration options in vite.config.ts.
  • This enhancement improves the Vite configuration by enabling lazy route discovery.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
vite.config.ts
Enhance Vite configuration with lazy route discovery         

vite.config.ts

  • Added v3_lazyRouteDiscovery to the future configuration options.
  • Enhances the Vite configuration for better route discovery.
  • +1/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    stackblitz bot commented Dec 3, 2024

    Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

    Copy link

    sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This PR updates the Vite configuration to enable the v3_lazyRouteDiscovery feature flag in the React Router configuration.

    Class diagram for Vite configuration update

    classDiagram
        class ViteConfig {
            +v3_fetcherPersist: boolean
            +v3_relativeSplatPath: boolean
            +v3_throwAbortReason: boolean
            +v3_lazyRouteDiscovery: boolean
        }
        note for ViteConfig "Added v3_lazyRouteDiscovery feature flag"
    
    Loading

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Added a new React Router v3 feature flag
    • Enabled the v3_lazyRouteDiscovery feature flag
    • Maintains existing feature flags for React Router
    vite.config.ts

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

    Walkthrough

    The changes involve an update to the vite.config.ts file, where a new configuration option, v3_lazyRouteDiscovery, has been added to the remixVitePlugin call and set to true. This addition modifies the way routes are discovered in the application. The existing chrome129IssuePlugin function remains unchanged, continuing to handle specific user-agent requests related to Chrome version 129, while maintaining its control flow and error handling.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    vite.config.ts Added property v3_lazyRouteDiscovery: true to remixVitePlugin configuration. chrome129IssuePlugin remains unchanged.

    Poem

    In the land of code where rabbits play,
    A new route discovery brightens the day.
    With v3_lazyRoute hopping along,
    Our plugin sings a cheerful song.
    Chrome's quirks still handled with care,
    In the world of Vite, we're light as air! 🐇✨


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Dec 3, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    (Review updated until commit 1a36432)

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Configuration Validation
    Verify that enabling lazy route discovery doesn't negatively impact the application's initial load time or routing behavior

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    Copy link

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Dec 3, 2024

    CI Failure Feedback 🧐

    (Checks updated until commit 1a36432)

    Action: Validate PR Title

    Failed stage: Run amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@0723387faaf9b38adef4775cd42cfd5155ed6017 [❌]

    Failed test name: Validate PR Title

    Failure summary:

    The action failed because the pull request title "Update vite.config.ts" did not conform to the
    expected semantic commit message format.

  • The title did not include a release type prefix, which is required to indicate the type of change.
  • The action expected a prefix as per the Conventional Commits specification.

  • Relevant error logs:
    1:  ##[group]Operating System
    2:  Ubuntu
    ...
    
    20:  Prepare workflow directory
    21:  Prepare all required actions
    22:  Getting action download info
    23:  Download action repository 'amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@0723387faaf9b38adef4775cd42cfd5155ed6017' (SHA:0723387faaf9b38adef4775cd42cfd5155ed6017)
    24:  Complete job name: Validate PR Title
    25:  ##[group]Run amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@0723387faaf9b38adef4775cd42cfd5155ed6017
    26:  with:
    27:  subjectPattern: ^(?![A-Z]).+$
    28:  subjectPatternError: The subject "{subject}" found in the pull request title "{title}"
    ...
    
    39:  refactor
    40:  revert
    41:  test
    42:  
    43:  githubBaseUrl: https://api.github.com
    44:  env:
    45:  GITHUB_TOKEN: ***
    46:  ##[endgroup]
    47:  ##[error]No release type found in pull request title "Update vite.config.ts". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/
    

    ✨ CI feedback usage guide:

    The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
    The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

    • Failed stage
    • Failed test name
    • Failure summary
    • Relevant error logs

    In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

    /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"
    

    where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

    Configuration options

    • enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
    • excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
    • enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
    • persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
    • final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

    See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

    Copy link

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hey @NxPKG - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

    Overall Comments:

    • Please provide context for this change - what problem does enabling v3_lazyRouteDiscovery solve and what benefits are expected?
    • The PR description is empty and missing an issue reference. Please fill in the description and link to any relevant issues.
    Here's what I looked at during the review
    • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
    • 🟢 Security: all looks good
    • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
    • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
    • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

    Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
    Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

    Copy link

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 0

    🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
    vite.config.ts (1)

    Line range hint 33-54: Consider enhancing the Chrome version detection logic

    The Chrome version detection implementation works but could be more robust and maintainable.

    Consider these improvements:

     function chrome129IssuePlugin() {
    +  const BLOCKED_CHROME_VERSION = 129;
    +  
    +  function parseVersion(userAgent: string | undefined): number | null {
    +    const match = userAgent?.match(/Chrom(?:e|ium)\/([0-9]+)\./);
    +    return match ? parseInt(match[1], 10) : null;
    +  }
    +
       return {
         name: 'chrome129IssuePlugin',
         configureServer(server: ViteDevServer) {
           server.middlewares.use((req, res, next) => {
    -        const raw = req.headers['user-agent']?.match(/Chrom(e|ium)\/([0-9]+)\./);
    -
    -        if (raw) {
    -          const version = parseInt(raw[2], 10);
    -
    -          if (version === 129) {
    +        const version = parseVersion(req.headers['user-agent']);
    +        if (version === BLOCKED_CHROME_VERSION) {

    This refactor:

    1. Makes the blocked version configurable
    2. Improves version parsing reliability
    3. Separates concerns for better maintainability
    🧰 Tools
    🪛 GitHub Check: Test

    [failure] 23-23:
    Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'v3_lazyRouteDiscovery' does not exist in type 'Partial'.

    📜 Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5772925 and 1a36432.

    📒 Files selected for processing (1)
    • vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
    🧰 Additional context used
    🪛 GitHub Check: Test
    vite.config.ts

    [failure] 23-23:
    Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'v3_lazyRouteDiscovery' does not exist in type 'Partial'.

    🔇 Additional comments (1)
    vite.config.ts (1)

    23-23: Verify Remix version compatibility for v3_lazyRouteDiscovery

    The static analysis indicates that v3_lazyRouteDiscovery is not a recognized property in the Remix FutureConfig type. This could indicate version incompatibility or a potential typo.

    Let's verify the Remix version and available future flags:

    ✅ Verification successful

    The v3_lazyRouteDiscovery flag appears to be part of Remix v3 future flags

    Looking at the codebase, we can see other v3-prefixed future flags being used (v3_fetcherPersist, v3_relativeSplatPath, v3_throwAbortReason). The v3_lazyRouteDiscovery flag follows the same naming pattern and is used alongside these established v3 future flags. While it's not recognized by the current types (Remix ^2.10.0), this is expected behavior for future flags that enable v3 features ahead of the major version release.

    🏁 Scripts executed

    The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

    Script:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Check package.json for @remix-run/dev version
    cat package.json | jq '.dependencies["@remix-run/dev"] // .devDependencies["@remix-run/dev"]'
    
    # Search for documentation or types defining this flag
    rg -g "*.{ts,js,d.ts}" "v3_lazyRouteDiscovery" 
    

    Length of output: 206


    Script:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Let's check the Remix documentation or type definitions for future flags
    rg -g "*.{ts,js,d.ts}" "type FutureConfig" -A 10
    
    # Also search for any v3-related future flags
    rg -g "*.{ts,js,d.ts}" "v3[_-]" -A 2
    

    Length of output: 349

    🧰 Tools
    🪛 GitHub Check: Test

    [failure] 23-23:
    Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'v3_lazyRouteDiscovery' does not exist in type 'Partial'.

    Copy link

    Persistent review updated to latest commit 1a36432

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants