Improved File Name Extraction in getFileNameFromUrl Function #48
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the original implementation, the
getFileNameFromUrl
function generated a file name by combining a randomUUID
with the file name guessed byURLUtil.guessFileName
. This approach worked, but it did not always ensure that the file name was directly extracted from the URL.Original Code:
My Changes:
I modified the function to directly extract the file name from the URL itself, specifically by using the
Uri
class. Here's the updated implementation:Key Improvements:
Direct File Name Extraction:
UUID
, the new implementation directly retrieves the file name from the last path segment of the URL usinguri.lastPathSegment
.Validation:
URLUtil.isValidUrl
. If the URL is invalid, the function returnsnull
instead of proceeding with incorrect data.Cleaner and More Intuitive Naming:
Benefits:
UUID
.