Adding go vulncheck #2
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@evgenyk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new job step named Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-28: Suggestions for workflow improvementsWhile the current workflow is functional, consider the following enhancements:
- Add caching for Go modules to speed up subsequent runs.
- Use a more flexible Go version specification to accommodate minor updates.
- Output test results as artifacts for easier debugging.
Here's a diff with these improvements:
name: KindeCI on: push: branches: [ "main" ] pull_request: branches: [ "main" ] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v3 - name: Set up Go uses: actions/setup-go@v4 with: - go-version: '1.21' + go-version: '1.21.x' + - name: Cache Go modules + uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: ~/go/pkg/mod + key: ${{ runner.os }}-go-${{ hashFiles('**/go.sum') }} + restore-keys: | + ${{ runner.os }}-go- # - name: Build # run: go build -v ./... - name: Test run: go test -v ./... 2>&1 | tee test-results.txt - id: govulncheck uses: golang/govulncheck-action@v1 + - name: Upload test results + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + with: + name: test-results + path: test-results.txtThese changes will make the workflow more efficient and provide better visibility into test results.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
27-28: LGTM: Govulncheck step added successfully.The addition of the
govulncheckstep usinggolang/govulncheck-action@v1is a good enhancement to the workflow. It aligns with the PR objective of introducing go vulncheck and will help identify potential vulnerabilities in Go dependencies.
Line range hint
19-19: Consider uncommenting or removing the Build step.There's a commented out Build step in the workflow. If building the project is necessary before running tests or vulnerability checks, consider uncommenting this step. If it's not needed, it might be better to remove it entirely to keep the workflow clean.
To help make a decision, let's check if there are any other build steps or if this is referenced elsewhere:
Verification successful
Build step cleanup
The commented-out Build step is not necessary as there are no active build steps in the workflow. It's recommended to remove the commented line to keep the workflow clean.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other build steps or references to building in the workflow # Test 1: Look for other build steps echo "Checking for other build steps:" rg --type yaml 'run:.*go build' .github/workflows/ # Test 2: Check if there are any references to building in comments echo "Checking for references to building in comments:" rg --type yaml '#.*build' .github/workflows/ # Test 3: Check if there are any other .yml files in the .github/workflows directory echo "Checking for other workflow files:" fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/Length of output: 534
Explain your changes
Suppose there is a related issue with enough detail for a reviewer to understand your changes fully. In that case, you can omit an explanation and instead include either “Fixes #XX” or “Updates #XX” where “XX” is the issue number.
Checklist
🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.