Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

s2: Add block decode fuzzer #1044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

s2: Add block decode fuzzer #1044

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

klauspost
Copy link
Owner

@klauspost klauspost commented Jan 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced fuzz testing for block decoding functionality
    • Added comprehensive testing to validate data integrity and error handling during decoding process

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new fuzz testing function FuzzDecodeBlock in the s2/fuzz_test.go file. This function is designed to perform comprehensive testing of block decoding in the S2 compression package. The fuzzing logic includes encoding input data using multiple methods, checking data integrity, validating decoded output, and ensuring proper error handling during the decoding process. The function adds robustness to the package's testing suite by systematically exploring various input scenarios and potential edge cases in block decoding.

Changes

File Change Summary
s2/fuzz_test.go Added new fuzz testing function FuzzDecodeBlock with comprehensive decoding validation logic

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant F as Fuzzing Framework
    participant FD as FuzzDecodeBlock
    participant Encoder as S2 Encoder
    participant Decoder as S2 Decoder

    F->>FD: Provide input data
    FD->>Encoder: Encode data (Encode)
    FD->>Encoder: Encode data (EncodeBetter)
    FD->>Decoder: Attempt decoding
    FD->>FD: Validate decoded data
    FD->>FD: Check data integrity
    FD->>FD: Verify buffer limits
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the key steps in the FuzzDecodeBlock function, showing how input data is encoded, decoded, and then rigorously validated through multiple checks to ensure the robustness of the S2 compression package's decoding process.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
s2/fuzz_test.go (4)

204-205: Define magic number as a constant.

The size limit 8<<20 should be defined as a named constant at the package level for better maintainability and documentation.

+ const maxDecodedSize = 8 << 20  // 8MB

- if dlen > 8<<20 {
+ if dlen > maxDecodedSize {

212-215: Define buffer padding size as a constant.

The padding size 1024 and padding pattern 0xff should be defined as named constants for better maintainability.

+ const (
+     paddingSize = 1024
+     paddingByte = 0xff
+ )

  dataCapped := make([]byte, 0, len(data)+1024)
  dataCapped = append(dataCapped, data...)
- dataCapped = append(dataCapped, bytes.Repeat([]byte{0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff}, 1024/4)...)
+ dataCapped = append(dataCapped, bytes.Repeat([]byte{paddingByte}, paddingSize)...)

219-220: Define sentinel value as a constant.

The sentinel value 0xfe used for overflow detection should be defined as a named constant.

+ const overflowSentinel = 0xfe

- dst2 := bytes.Repeat([]byte{0xfe}, dlen+1024)
+ dst2 := bytes.Repeat([]byte{overflowSentinel}, dlen+paddingSize)

224-226: Improve error message clarity.

The error message could be more descriptive to help with debugging.

- t.Fatalf("base err: %v, capped: %v", baseErr, err)
+ t.Fatalf("unexpected error with capped buffer - base decode: %v, capped decode: %v", baseErr, err)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbaa9c1 and 71e3bdb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • s2/fuzz_test.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: fuzz-other ("noasm,nounsafe")
  • GitHub Check: fuzz-other (nounsafe)
  • GitHub Check: build-special
  • GitHub Check: fuzz-s2 ("noasm,nounsafe")
  • GitHub Check: fuzz-s2 (nounsafe)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
s2/fuzz_test.go (2)

186-196: Well-structured fuzzing setup with comprehensive test corpus!

The function is well-organized with:

  • Multiple encoding methods to increase coverage
  • Both regression and block corpus test data
  • Proper separation of corpus loading and fuzzing logic

197-245: Excellent fuzzing implementation!

The fuzzing logic is thorough and well-implemented with:

  • Proper input data integrity checks
  • Comprehensive buffer boundary testing
  • Good error validation
  • Effective testing of edge cases

@klauspost klauspost merged commit b05b993 into master Jan 21, 2025
22 checks passed
@klauspost klauspost deleted the s2-block-dec-fuzz branch January 21, 2025 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant