Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(web): better-error-display-and-evidence-search #1762

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

Harman-singh-waraich
Copy link
Contributor

@Harman-singh-waraich Harman-singh-waraich commented Nov 29, 2024

  • Parse wagmi contract errors better now (shortMessage was just returning "The function reverted" without reason, using metaMessages to try to get that now)
  • Enhanced evidence search (Can enter the words start and it will search matches. ex: tok, will search token, tokenization. It needs to be a prefix, in-between partial are not supported by subgraph.)
  • Fixed download button in fileviewer not inferring the type of file. Giving file a name(extracted from url) fixed the conflict that was causing the issue)

PR-Codex overview

This PR primarily focuses on enhancing error handling and search functionality in the application. It introduces a new utility function for transforming search strings and improves error message extraction across various components.

Detailed summary

  • Added transformSearch function in utils/transformSearch.ts for better search string formatting.
  • Updated parseWagmiError function in utils/parseWagmiError.ts for improved error message handling.
  • Modified wrapWithToast to use parseWagmiError for error messages.
  • Enhanced FileViewer component to include a fileNameIfIpfsUrl function for improved file naming.
  • Updated SubmitDisputeButton and StakeWithdrawButton to utilize parseWagmiError for error messaging.
  • Integrated transformSearch in useEvidences for processing keywords.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new utility function for improved error handling in staking and dispute submission processes.
    • Added a new function to transform search keywords for enhanced query processing.
    • Enhanced the FileViewer component to generate descriptive file names for documents loaded from IPFS URLs.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced clarity and consistency of error messages during dispute submissions.
    • Improved error handling responsiveness in staking operations.
  • Documentation
    • Updated error handling logic to utilize the new utility function for better user experience.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the introduction of a new utility function, parseWagmiError, which enhances error handling in two components: StakeWithdrawButton.tsx and SubmitDisputeButton.tsx. Both components now utilize this function to improve the clarity and consistency of error messages. Additionally, the useEffect dependency arrays in these components have been updated to include relevant state management functions, ensuring better responsiveness to changes. A new file, parseWagmiError.ts, has been created to define this utility function and its associated types. Furthermore, a new utility function transformSearch has been added to facilitate keyword processing in the useEvidences hook.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx - Added import for parseWagmiError.
- Updated error handling logic to use parseWagmiError(setStakeError).
- Modified useEffect dependency array to include setErrorMsg.
web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/SubmitDisputeButton.tsx - Added import for parseWagmiError.
- Updated error handling logic to use parseWagmiError(error).
- Reorganized import statements.
web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts - Added new utility function parseWagmiError and type ExtendedWagmiError.
web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidences.ts - Updated to use transformed keywords from transformSearch in GraphQL query variables.
web/src/utils/transformSearch.ts - Added new utility function transformSearch for processing search strings.
web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx - Added function fileNameIfIpfsUrl for generating file names from IPFS URLs.
- Updated FileViewer component to use generated file names.
web-devtools/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts - Added new utility function parseWagmiError and type ExtendedWagmiError.
web-devtools/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts - Updated error handling to use parseWagmiError in wrapWithToast and catchShortMessage.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Type: Enhancement :sparkles:, Package: Web

Suggested reviewers

  • alcercu
  • kemuru

Poem

🐇 In the code where errors dwell,
A new function casts a spell.
Parsing woes with graceful ease,
Staking, disputes, all to please.
With clearer messages in sight,
Our buttons shine, oh what a delight! 🌟


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5f5771d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-neo/deploys/6749a3ddddf061000847cf09
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1762--kleros-v2-neo.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet-devtools/deploys/6749a873f8ac4d75c983d6cf
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1762--kleros-v2-testnet-devtools.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5f5771d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-university/deploys/6749a3dd3b5dc700082f7e15
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1762--kleros-v2-university.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts (2)

5-9: Improve JSDoc documentation

The parameter description should include the type name for better clarity.

 /**
- * @param error
+ * @param error SimulateContractErrorType
  * @description Tries to extract the human readable error message, otherwise reverts to error.message
  * @returns Human readable error if possible
  */

10-17: Consider error handling architecture improvements

A few architectural suggestions to enhance error handling:

  1. Add error logging for debugging purposes
  2. Consider implementing i18n for error messages
  3. Create an error registry/catalog for consistent error handling across the application

Example implementation with logging:

import { logger } from '../utils/logger'; // You'll need to implement this

export const parseWagmiError = (error: SimulateContractErrorType) => {
  try {
    // ... existing implementation ...
  } catch (e) {
    logger.error('Error parsing Wagmi error', { originalError: error, parseError: e });
    return 'An unexpected error occurred';
  }
};

Would you like me to help create a proposal for implementing these architectural improvements?

web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/SubmitDisputeButton.tsx (3)

69-71: Consider enhancing error handling.

While the current implementation is good, consider these improvements:

  1. Add error logging for debugging purposes
  2. Type the error message more specifically
  const errorMsg = useMemo(() => {
    if (insufficientBalance) return "Insufficient balance";
    else if (error) {
+     console.error('Dispute submission error:', error);
      return parseWagmiError(error);
    }
    return null;
-  }, [error, insufficientBalance]);
+  }, [error, insufficientBalance]) as string | null;

Line range hint 91-105: Enhance contract submission error handling.

The contract submission error handling could be more robust. Consider extracting the submission logic into a separate function and adding more specific error handling.

+ const handleSubmitCase = async (config: any) => {
+   try {
+     const res = await wrapWithToast(
+       async () => await submitCase(config),
+       publicClient
+     );
+     if (res.status && !isUndefined(res.result)) {
+       const id = retrieveDisputeId(res.result.logs[1]);
+       setDisputeId(Number(id));
+       setCourtId(disputeData.courtId ?? "1");
+       setIsPopupOpen(true);
+       resetDisputeData();
+     }
+   } catch (error) {
+     console.error('Failed to submit case:', error);
+   } finally {
+     setIsSubmittingCase(false);
+   }
+ };

  <StyledButton
    text="Submit the case"
    disabled={isButtonDisabled}
    isLoading={(isSubmittingCase || isBalanceLoading) && !insufficientBalance}
    onClick={() => {
-     if (submitCaseConfig) {
-       setIsSubmittingCase(true);
-       wrapWithToast(async () => await submitCase(submitCaseConfig.request), publicClient)
-         .then((res) => {
-           if (res.status && !isUndefined(res.result)) {
-             const id = retrieveDisputeId(res.result.logs[1]);
-             setDisputeId(Number(id));
-             setCourtId(disputeData.courtId ?? "1");
-             setIsPopupOpen(true);
-             resetDisputeData();
-           }
-         })
-         .finally(() => {
-           setIsSubmittingCase(false);
-         });
-     }
+     if (submitCaseConfig) {
+       setIsSubmittingCase(true);
+       handleSubmitCase(submitCaseConfig.request);
+     }
    }}
  />

Line range hint 48-48: Address the TODO comment about dispute kit selection.

The TODO comment indicates a pending decision about which dispute kit to use. This should be addressed before the code goes to production.

Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this TODO item?

web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (1)

158-160: Optimize useEffect implementation

While the error parsing improvement is good, there are two suggestions:

  1. Remove setErrorMsg from the dependencies array as React guarantees state setters are stable.
  2. Consider clearing the error when the effect cleanup runs.
  useEffect(() => {
    if (setStakeError) {
      setErrorMsg(parseWagmiError(setStakeError));
    }
-  }, [setStakeError, setErrorMsg]);
+    return () => setErrorMsg("");
+  }, [setStakeError]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c41958 and aefafea.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (3 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/SubmitDisputeButton.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/SubmitDisputeButton.tsx (2)

17-17: LGTM! Import changes are well-organized.

The addition of parseWagmiError utility and reorganization of imports improve code organization.

Also applies to: 23-23


69-69: LGTM! Error handling improvement.

The integration of parseWagmiError standardizes error message handling across components.

web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (2)

23-23: LGTM: Clean import addition

The import of the new error parsing utility is well-placed and follows the project's conventions.


158-160: Verify error message clarity

Let's ensure the parsed error messages are user-friendly and provide clear guidance.

✅ Verification successful

Error handling implementation is well-structured and user-friendly

The parseWagmiError utility is well-implemented to provide clear, human-readable error messages by:

  • Prioritizing detailed meta messages that explain the specific issue
  • Falling back to short messages that summarize the error
  • Using the base error message as a final fallback

The implementation follows good practices for blockchain error handling:

  • Properly types the error interface
  • Handles undefined cases gracefully
  • Is consistently used across components for uniform error reporting
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of parseWagmiError to verify message clarity

# Find and display the parseWagmiError implementation
echo "Checking parseWagmiError implementation..."
fd -e ts -e tsx parseWagmiError.ts --exec cat {}

# Look for other usages of parseWagmiError to compare error handling patterns
echo "Checking other usages of parseWagmiError..."
rg "parseWagmiError" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 3344

web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5f5771d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet/deploys/6749a3dd809b080008ba402b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1762--kleros-v2-testnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@Harman-singh-waraich Harman-singh-waraich changed the title chore(web): function-to-parse-wagmi-simulate-error chore(web): better-error-display-and-evidence-search Nov 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/utils/transformSearch.ts (2)

1-5: Enhance JSDoc documentation for better clarity.

The current documentation could be more descriptive. Consider adding parameter and return types, and explaining the transformation logic.

 /**
- *
- * @param searchString
- * @returns A search string to better search with fullTextSearch
+ * Transforms a search string into a PostgreSQL full-text search compatible format.
+ * Each word in the input string is transformed to support exact and prefix matching.
+ * 
+ * @param searchString - The input search string to transform
+ * @returns {string|null} A transformed string in format "word | word:*" for each word,
+ *                        or null if the input is empty/undefined
+ * @example
+ * transformSearch("hello world")
+ * // Returns: "hello | hello:* | world | world:*"
  */

6-16: Consider adding input sanitization for special characters.

The current implementation might be vulnerable to special characters that could affect PostgreSQL full-text search syntax. Consider sanitizing the input to handle special characters properly.

 export const transformSearch = (searchString?: string) => {
   if (!searchString) return null;
+  // Escape special characters that might interfere with full-text search
+  const sanitizeWord = (word: string) => {
+    return word.replace(/[&|:*']/g, '');
+  };
+
   const words = searchString
     .split(/\s+/)
-    .map((word) => word.trim())
+    .map((word) => sanitizeWord(word.trim()))
     .filter(Boolean);

   const transformedWords = words.map((word) => `${word} | ${word}:*`);

   return transformedWords.join(" | ");
 };
web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidences.ts (1)

Line range hint 48-63: Implementation looks good with room for enhancement

The overall implementation is clean and well-structured. Consider these architectural improvements:

  1. Add error handling for failed transformations
  2. Consider caching transformed keywords for performance
  3. Add logging for search patterns to help debug search-related issues
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f0596e and fb063f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidences.ts (3 hunks)
  • web/src/utils/transformSearch.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/src/utils/transformSearch.ts (1)

6-16: Verify the function usage in GraphQL queries.

The function appears to be used for PostgreSQL full-text search in GraphQL queries. Let's verify its integration.

✅ Verification successful

The previous results show that transformSearch is used in useEvidences hook for search functionality, but we need to verify:

  1. The actual GraphQL query implementation to see how the transformed search string is used
  2. The underlying SQL implementation to ensure PostgreSQL compatibility
  3. The schema definition that handles the search

This will help us confirm if the function's output format matches the database query requirements.


The previous results show that:

  1. The transformed search string is used in the evidenceSearch GraphQL query
  2. The function's output format (word | word:*) is passed to the backend
  3. We need to verify the schema and resolver implementation to ensure this format is compatible with the backend's search implementation

The transformSearch function implementation is correct and compatible with the backend search.

The verification shows that:

  1. The GraphQL schema uses a full-text search on the ClassicEvidence entity with fields name, description, senderAddress, and evidenceIndex
  2. The search is implemented using PostgreSQL's full-text search (as indicated by the @fulltext directive with algorithm: rank)
  3. The function's output format (word | word:*) is compatible with PostgreSQL's tsquery syntax:
    • The | operator is the OR operator in tsquery
    • The :* suffix is the prefix matching operator in tsquery

The implementation correctly transforms search terms into a PostgreSQL-compatible full-text search query string.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how transformSearch is used in GraphQL queries and verify PostgreSQL compatibility

# Find GraphQL query files that might use this function
echo "Searching for GraphQL queries using transformSearch..."
rg -l "transformSearch" --type ts

# Look for the useEvidences hook mentioned in the summary
echo "Checking useEvidences hook implementation..."
rg -A 10 "useEvidences" --type ts

# Look for any GraphQL schema definitions related to full-text search
echo "Checking GraphQL schema for full-text search fields..."
rg -A 5 "fulltext|tsquery|tsvector" --type graphql

Length of output: 3413


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the GraphQL query implementation and schema
echo "Checking GraphQL query implementations..."
rg -A 10 "evidenceSearchQuery|evidencesQuery" --type ts

# Let's also check the actual SQL query implementation
echo "Checking SQL query implementation..."
rg -A 10 "tsquery|tsvector" --type ts --type sql

Length of output: 2893


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the schema and resolver implementation for evidenceSearch
echo "Checking schema definition..."
fd -e graphql -x cat {}

echo "Checking resolver implementation..."
rg -A 10 "evidenceSearch.*text:" --type ts

Length of output: 25769

web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidences.ts (2)

5-5: Add null check before keyword transformation

The transformSearch is called directly on keywords without checking if it's undefined, which could lead to unnecessary transformations.

Consider this safer approach:

- const transformedKeywords = transformSearch(keywords);
+ const transformedKeywords = keywords ? transformSearch(keywords) : undefined;

Let's verify the transformSearch utility implementation:

Also applies to: 49-50


59-59: Verify GraphQL schema compatibility with transformed keywords

The transformed keywords are passed directly to the GraphQL query. We should verify that the transformation output matches the expected format in the GraphQL schema.

Let's check the GraphQL schema and other query implementations:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to find the GraphQL schema and query definitions.


Let me try one more search to find the GraphQL schema and query definitions specifically in the web directory.


Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have found the GraphQL query definition and its usage:

GraphQL schema compatibility is verified

The transformedKeywords are correctly used in the GraphQL query evidenceSearch which expects:

  • A text parameter of type String! (non-null string)
  • An optional where parameter with evidenceGroup field

The transformation output matches the schema requirements as:

  1. The query is properly typed with String! for keywords parameter
  2. The transformSearch function's output is used directly as the text parameter
  3. The evidenceGroup is passed as an optional string parameter
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GraphQL schema definition and similar query implementations
# Expected: Find schema definition and similar search implementations

# Check for GraphQL schema definition
echo "Checking for evidence search schema definition:"
rg -p "type.*EvidenceSearch|input.*EvidenceSearch" --type graphql

# Check for similar search query implementations
echo "Checking for similar search patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'evidenceSearch(text: $keywords'

Length of output: 343


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for GraphQL schema files and query definitions
echo "Searching for GraphQL schema files:"
fd '\.(graphql|gql)$'

echo -e "\nSearching for evidence search related queries:"
rg -p "query.*evidence.*|type.*Evidence.*|input.*Evidence.*" --type-add 'graphql:*.{graphql,gql}'

echo -e "\nChecking TypeScript files for evidence search query:"
rg -p "useEvidences.*|evidenceSearch.*" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

Length of output: 122151


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for GraphQL schema and query definitions in web directory
echo "Searching for GraphQL schema and query files in web directory:"
fd '\.(graphql|gql)$' web/

echo -e "\nSearching for evidence search query definitions in TypeScript files:"
rg -p "type.*Evidence|query.*evidence.*|interface.*Evidence" web/src -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 5

echo -e "\nChecking the specific query implementation:"
rg -p "useEvidences" web/src -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 10

Length of output: 3649

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx (3)

31-31: Consider adding type safety improvements

While the change is functionally correct, consider adding type safety:

-  const docs = [{ uri: url, fileName: fileNameIfIpfsUrl(url) }];
+  type DocViewerItem = {
+    uri: string;
+    fileName: string;
+  };
+  const docs: DocViewerItem[] = [{ uri: url, fileName: fileNameIfIpfsUrl(url) }];

53-72: Add comprehensive JSDoc documentation

The function would benefit from detailed documentation explaining the supported URL formats and examples.

+/**
+ * Generates a filename from an IPFS URL.
+ * @param url - The IPFS URL in format ipfs://<hash>/<path> or https://<gateway>/ipfs/<hash>/<path>
+ * @returns A sanitized filename in format ipfs-<hash>_<path> or "document" if invalid
+ * @example
+ * fileNameIfIpfsUrl("ipfs://Qm...abc/test.pdf") // returns "ipfs-Qm...abc_test.pdf"
+ * fileNameIfIpfsUrl("https://ipfs.io/ipfs/Qm...abc") // returns "ipfs-Qm...abc"
+ */
 const fileNameIfIpfsUrl = (url: string) => {

66-68: Consider adding filename length limits

The generated filename could potentially be very long. Consider adding a maximum length limit:

 const sanitizedPath = path.replace(/\//g, "_");
+const MAX_FILENAME_LENGTH = 255; // Common filesystem limit
+let filename = `ipfs-${ipfsHash}${sanitizedPath ? `_${sanitizedPath}` : ""}`;
+if (filename.length > MAX_FILENAME_LENGTH) {
+  filename = filename.substring(0, MAX_FILENAME_LENGTH);
+}
-return `ipfs-${ipfsHash}${sanitizedPath ? `_${sanitizedPath}` : ""}`;
+return filename;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb063f6 and d88445b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx (1)

58-58: Verify IPFS URL pattern handling

The regex pattern needs verification for all possible IPFS URL formats. Let's check the pattern against various URL formats:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see how the IPFS pattern is being used in the codebase. Let me analyze the actual usage to verify the pattern's correctness.


Looking at the full context and the codebase search results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification of the IPFS URL pattern.

The IPFS URL pattern is correctly implemented

The regex pattern correctly handles:

  • Direct IPFS protocol URLs (ipfs://)
  • HTTP gateway URLs with IPFS path (https://<gateway>/ipfs/)
  • IPFS hash capture in group 1
  • Optional file path capture in group 2
  • Proper character set for IPFS hashes ([A-Za-z0-9\-_])

The implementation is used appropriately in the fileNameIfIpfsUrl function to extract both the IPFS hash and optional path components, which aligns with standard IPFS URL formats. The pattern is also consistent with the IPFS URL handling seen in other parts of the codebase (e.g., getIpfsUrl.ts).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Test the IPFS URL pattern against various formats

# Create a test file with various IPFS URL formats
cat << 'EOF' > test_urls.txt
ipfs://QmW2WQi7j6c7UgJTarActp7tDNikE4B2qXtFCfLPdsgaTQ
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmW2WQi7j6c7UgJTarActp7tDNikE4B2qXtFCfLPdsgaTQ
https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmW2WQi7j6c7UgJTarActp7tDNikE4B2qXtFCfLPdsgaTQ
ipfs://QmW2WQi7j6c7UgJTarActp7tDNikE4B2qXtFCfLPdsgaTQ/path/to/file.pdf
EOF

# Test the pattern against each URL
gawk '
BEGIN { pattern = "(?:ipfs://|https?://(?:[A-Za-z0-9.-]+)/ipfs/)([A-Za-z0-9]+[A-Za-z0-9-_]*)/?(.*)" }
{
    if ($0 ~ pattern) {
        print "✓ Valid: " $0
    } else {
        print "✗ Invalid: " $0
    }
}' test_urls.txt

Length of output: 412


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any existing IPFS URL usage in the codebase to understand the patterns being handled
rg -i "ipfs://" --type ts --type tsx -C 2

# Also search for IPFS gateway patterns
rg -i "ipfs\.(io|infura)" --type ts --type tsx -C 2

Length of output: 151


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for IPFS patterns without file type restrictions
rg -i "ipfs://" -C 2

# Look for test files or examples that might contain IPFS URLs
fd -e test.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.ts -e spec.tsx -X cat

# Search for the actual regex pattern usage in the codebase
rg "ipfsPattern" -C 2

Length of output: 22381


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the full context of how this pattern is used in the FileViewer component
rg -B 10 -A 10 "ipfsPattern" web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx

Length of output: 611

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx (2)

57-57: Consider stricter IPFS hash validation

The current regex pattern ([A-Za-z0-9\-_]*) is quite permissive for IPFS hash validation. Consider using a more specific pattern that matches the exact IPFS hash format (base58 encoding, specific length requirements).

-  const ipfsPattern = /(?:ipfs:\/\/|https?:\/\/(?:[A-Za-z0-9.-]+)\/ipfs\/)([A-Za-z0-9]+[A-Za-z0-9\-_]*)\/?(.*)/;
+  const ipfsPattern = /(?:ipfs:\/\/|https?:\/\/(?:[A-Za-z0-9.-]+)\/ipfs\/)([123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz]{46})\/?(.*)/;

53-71: Add unit tests for edge cases

The function handles various URL formats and includes fallbacks, but should be thoroughly tested for edge cases:

  • Invalid IPFS URLs
  • URLs with special characters in paths
  • Various gateway formats
  • Empty/invalid inputs

Would you like me to help create a test suite for this function?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d88445b and e1e44e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/components/FileViewer/index.tsx (1)

31-31: LGTM: Improved file naming for IPFS documents

The addition of the fileName prop enhances document identification in the viewer.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2024
alcercu
alcercu previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@alcercu alcercu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@alcercu alcercu added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 29, 2024
@alcercu alcercu removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Nov 29, 2024
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 5f5771d and detected 5 issues on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category Count
Complexity 1
Style 4

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
web-devtools/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts (2)

1-3: Consider adding a type guard for safer type casting

The current implementation assumes the error object will have the extended properties. Consider adding a type guard to safely check if the error matches the ExtendedWagmiError interface.

+const isExtendedWagmiError = (error: SimulateContractErrorType): error is ExtendedWagmiError => {
+  return 'shortMessage' in error || 'metaMessages' in error;
+}

 type ExtendedWagmiError = SimulateContractErrorType & { shortMessage?: string; metaMessages?: string[] };

5-9: Enhance documentation with precedence order and example usage

The documentation could be more helpful by explicitly stating the order of precedence for error messages and including an example usage.

 /**
  * @param error
- * @description Tries to extract the human readable error message, otherwise reverts to error.message
+ * @description Extracts a human readable error message with the following precedence:
+ * 1. First meta message from metaMessages array
+ * 2. Short message
+ * 3. Original error.message
  * @returns Human readable error if possible
+ * @example
+ * try {
+ *   // contract interaction
+ * } catch (error) {
+ *   const message = parseWagmiError(error);
+ *   console.error(message);
+ * }
  */
web-devtools/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts (1)

39-42: Consider adding type safety to error handling

While the error handling is improved with parseWagmiError, adding type checking would make it more robust.

Consider this improvement:

-    .catch((error) => {
+    .catch((error: unknown) => {
       toast.error(parseWagmiError(error), OPTIONS);
       return { status: false };
     });
web/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts (1)

49-51: Consider renaming and improving type safety

The function name catchShortMessage might be misleading since it now uses parseWagmiError. Additionally, the type safety could be improved.

Consider this improvement:

-export async function catchShortMessage(promise: Promise<any>) {
+export async function catchAndNotifyError<T>(promise: Promise<T>): Promise<T | void> {
   return await promise.catch((error) => toast.error(parseWagmiError(error), OPTIONS));
 }

This change:

  1. Renames the function to better reflect its purpose
  2. Adds generic type parameter for better type safety
  3. Improves return type annotation
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1e44e4 and 5f5771d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • web-devtools/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts (1 hunks)
  • web-devtools/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts (2 hunks)
  • web/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
web-devtools/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts (1)

10-17: Verify consistent error handling pattern across components

Let's ensure the function is being used consistently across all components.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional scripts to check for error handling patterns and SimulateContractErrorType usage more thoroughly.


Error handling implementation is consistent across components

The verification shows that parseWagmiError is being used consistently throughout the codebase:

  • It's properly integrated with the wrapWithToast utility in both web and web-devtools
  • All Wagmi contract simulation errors are handled uniformly through this function
  • The error handling pattern is consistent across components, with proper error message extraction and toast notifications

The implementation shows a standardized approach to error handling where:

  • Contract interaction errors are parsed through parseWagmiError
  • Errors are displayed via toast notifications
  • The error handling chain preserves the original error information while providing user-friendly messages
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage patterns of parseWagmiError across components

# Search for imports of parseWagmiError
echo "Checking import patterns:"
rg "import.*parseWagmiError" -A 1

# Search for usage of parseWagmiError
echo "\nChecking usage patterns:"
rg "parseWagmiError\(" -A 2

# Look for potential missed error handling opportunities
echo "\nChecking for potential missed opportunities:"
rg "SimulateContractErrorType" --type typescript

Length of output: 2436


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns in TypeScript files
echo "Checking error type definitions and handling patterns:"
rg "SimulateContractErrorType|ExtendedWagmiError" --type ts

# Search for other potential error handling in components
echo "\nChecking component error handling:"
rg "catch.*error" --type ts -A 2

# Look for toast error patterns
echo "\nChecking toast error patterns:"
rg "toast\.error" --type ts -A 2

# Check for any other wagmi error handling
echo "\nChecking wagmi error handling:"
rg "wagmi.*error|error.*wagmi" --type ts -i

Length of output: 11943

web-devtools/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts (2)

4-4: LGTM: Clean import addition

The import statement is well-placed and aligns with the PR's objective of improving error handling.


Line range hint 4-47: Verify consistent error handling across the codebase

Let's ensure that parseWagmiError is being used consistently in all error handling scenarios.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the error handling patterns by checking the implementation of parseWagmiError and its usage.


Error handling is consistently implemented across the codebase

The verification shows that error handling is properly implemented:

  • parseWagmiError is consistently used for handling Wagmi-specific contract errors in both web and web-devtools
  • The implementation is identical in both locations and properly extracts human-readable messages
  • All catch blocks handling Wagmi errors use parseWagmiError
  • Other error toasts (debounceErrorToast and direct error messages) are used appropriately for non-Wagmi errors
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential inconsistencies in error handling

# Look for direct toast.error calls that might need to use parseWagmiError
echo "Checking for direct toast.error calls:"
rg "toast\.error\(" --type ts

# Look for catch blocks that might need to use parseWagmiError
echo -e "\nChecking for catch blocks:"
ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($ERROR) { $$$$ }'

Length of output: 1111


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of parseWagmiError
echo "Checking parseWagmiError implementation:"
rg -A 5 "parseWagmiError" --type ts

# Check for error handling utilities
echo -e "\nChecking for other error handling utilities:"
fd "error" --type f --extension ts --exec echo "=== {}" \; --exec cat {}

Length of output: 7521

web/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts (2)

4-4: LGTM: Import statement aligns with error handling improvements

The addition of parseWagmiError import aligns with the PR's objective of improving error message display.


44-46: Verify error handling coverage

The integration of parseWagmiError improves error message clarity. However, let's verify that it handles all possible error types from contract interactions.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the parseWagmiError implementation since it wasn't found in the previous search.


Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I found the implementation of parseWagmiError and its usage patterns.

Error handling implementation is appropriate

The parseWagmiError function in web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts properly handles contract interaction errors by:

  • Extracting detailed error messages from metaMessages
  • Falling back to shortMessage
  • Using the generic error.message as a final fallback

The implementation covers all essential error scenarios from Wagmi contract interactions with a proper fallback chain, making it a robust solution for error handling.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for all error types handled in the codebase
# Look for contract interaction error patterns to ensure parseWagmiError covers all cases

# Search for error handling patterns in contract interactions
rg -A 2 "catch\s*\(\s*(error|err)" 

# Look for the implementation of parseWagmiError
ast-grep --pattern 'function parseWagmiError($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 6005


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for parseWagmiError implementation with different patterns
rg -A 10 "parseWagmiError" 

# Search for wagmi error handling patterns
rg -A 3 "wagmi.*error"

Length of output: 7831

web-devtools/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
web-devtools/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@alcercu alcercu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Package: Web Court web frontend Type: Enhancement ✨ Type: UX User Experience
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants