feat: update ui library, abstract hover transition style, update favicon, add more hovers #1792
Conversation
…con, add more hovers
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a series of styling and transition-related improvements across multiple components in the web application. The changes primarily focus on centralizing hover transition timings by importing Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx (1)
The padding adjustment aligns with the PR objectives to improve layout consistency. The use of Let's verify other components using similar padding patterns: ✅ Verification successfulThe previous command failed because the file type wasn't recognized. Let's try with explicit file type flags and also search for similar responsive padding patterns to verify consistency. Let's try without file type flags since ripgrep seems to have issues with them in this environment. This should help us find similar patterns across the codebase. LGTM! The padding pattern is consistent with other pages. The search results confirm that the padding values in
The padding values maintain consistent spacing ratios while providing appropriate responsiveness across different viewport sizes. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Find similar Container components with responsive padding
# to ensure consistent spacing patterns across the application
# Search for styled Container components with padding
rg -A 5 "const Container = styled\." --type typescript
Length of output: 91 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for styled Container components with padding, considering both .ts and .tsx files
rg -t tsx -t ts -A 5 "const Container = styled\."
# Also search for similar padding patterns using responsiveSize
rg -t tsx -t ts "responsiveSize\([^)]+,[^)]+\)" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 167 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for styled Container components with padding
rg "const Container = styled\." -A 5
# Search for similar padding patterns using responsiveSize
rg "responsiveSize\([^)]+,[^)]+\)" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 66338 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
web/src/components/HowItWorks.tsx (1)
9-9: Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibilityThe component represents an interactive "How it works" guide, but lacks proper ARIA attributes.
const Container = styled.div` ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} display: flex; align-items: center; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 400; gap: 8px; cursor: pointer; color: ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryBlue}; + /* Add role="button" and aria-expanded to the rendered element */ `;Add these attributes to the Container in the render:
- <Container onClick={toggleMiniGuide}> + <Container + onClick={toggleMiniGuide} + role="button" + aria-expanded={isMiniGuideOpen} + aria-label="How it works guide" + >web/src/components/LightButton.tsx (1)
Line range hint
18-24: Consider removing !important flags and using theme variables for opacityThe use of !important flags suggests potential CSS specificity issues. Additionally, hardcoded opacity values could be moved to the theme for better maintainability.
// In your theme file + export const theme = { + // ... existing theme values + opacity: { + strong: '0.8', + medium: '0.6', + } + }; // In this file .button-svg { - fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => (isMobileNavbar ? theme.secondaryText : `${theme.white}BF`)} !important; + fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => (isMobileNavbar ? theme.secondaryText : `${theme.white}${theme.opacity.strong}`)}; } &:hover { .button-svg { - fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => (isMobileNavbar ? theme.primaryText : `${theme.white}`)} !important; + fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => (isMobileNavbar ? theme.primaryText : theme.white)}; } background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.whiteLowOpacityStrong}; }Consider reviewing the component's styles to resolve specificity issues that necessitate !important flags.
web/src/layout/Header/Logo.tsx (1)
34-42: LGTM! Consider using CSS opacity property.The hover transition implementation is clean and consistent. However, consider using the CSS
opacityproperty instead of hex opacity for better maintainability:&:hover { path { - fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.white}BF; + fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.white}; + opacity: 0.75; } }web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx (2)
Line range hint
19-27: Consider standardizing opacity values.The hover effect uses ~73% opacity (BB) while other components use 75% (BF). Consider standardizing these values across the application for consistency.
&:hover { - background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BB; + background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BF; }
19-20: Consider using transform: translate3d(0,0,0) for performance.To optimize hover animations, consider adding a transform to trigger GPU acceleration:
const StyledCard = styled(Card)` ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} + transform: translate3d(0,0,0); width: 100%;web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx (1)
11-11: Consider enhancing hover effect for better accessibilityWhile the hover transition implementation is correct, consider extending the hover effect to the text as well, not just the icon. This would provide better visual feedback and improve accessibility.
Consider updating the hover styles:
const StyledInternalLink = styled(InternalLink)` ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} display: flex; gap: 4px; &:hover { + color: ${({ theme }) => theme.secondaryBlue}; svg { fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.secondaryBlue}; } } `;Also applies to: 42-50
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Filters.tsx (1)
31-42: LGTM! Consider adding type safety to the theme props.The abstraction of common icon styles into
BaseIconStylesimproves code maintainability. The hover transition timing is now consistently managed.Consider adding TypeScript type safety to the theme props:
- fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryBlue}; + fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryBlue as string}; - fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.secondaryBlue}; + fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.secondaryBlue as string};web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx (1)
31-38: LGTM! Consider enhancing accessibility.The hover transition and color change provide good visual feedback for interactive elements.
Consider adding ARIA attributes and focus styles for better accessibility:
const StyledLabel = styled.label` ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} color: ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryBlue}; cursor: pointer; - :hover { + :hover, :focus-visible { color: ${({ theme }) => theme.secondaryBlue}; } + + :focus-visible { + outline: 2px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryBlue}; + outline-offset: 2px; + } `;web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (2)
101-105: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for empty/invalid paths.The breadcrumb items creation is simplified and more maintainable.
Consider adding a fallback for empty or invalid paths:
const breadcrumbItems = - courtPath?.map((node) => ({ + courtPath?.map((node) => node?.name ? { text: node.name, value: node.id, - })) ?? []; + } : null).filter(Boolean) ?? [];
113-119: Consider adding error boundary for navigation failures.The navigation callback is clean and straightforward, but should handle potential errors.
Consider wrapping the navigation in a try-catch:
- callback={(courtId) => navigate(`/courts/${courtId}`)} + callback={(courtId) => { + try { + navigate(`/courts/${courtId}`); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Navigation failed:', error); + // Handle navigation error (e.g., show error toast) + } + }}web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
169-178: Consider applying consistent hover transitions to all link components.While the addition of
hoverShortTransitionTimingtoStyledInternalLinkis good, consider applying the same timing toStyledExternalLinkandAddresscomponents for consistent hover behavior across all interactive elements.Consider updating the other styled components:
const Address = styled.p` + ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} ${HoverStyle} margin: 0; `; const StyledExternalLink = styled(ExternalLink)` + ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} ${HoverStyle} `;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
web/src/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.ico
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Filters.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeListView.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DottedMenuButton.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/HowItWorks.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/LightButton.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/Logo.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/styles/commonStyles.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint 36-46: Verify intentional difference in hover behavior.
The hover behavior is opposite to the header logo:
- Header logo: 100% opacity → 75% opacity on hover
- Footer logo: 75% opacity → 100% opacity on hover
Is this difference intentional for visual hierarchy? If not, consider maintaining consistency:
path {
- fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.white}BF;
+ fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.white};
}
:hover path {
- fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.white};
+ fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.white}BF;
}web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeListView.tsx (1)
12-12: LGTM: Clean implementation of standardized hover timing
The addition of hoverShortTransitionTiming and its application to StyledListItem aligns well with the PR's goal of standardizing hover transitions across components.
Also applies to: 18-18
web/src/components/DottedMenuButton.tsx (1)
4-5: Verify animation interactions
The hover effect changes look good, but please verify that the new hover transition works harmoniously with the existing ripple animation, especially when both are triggered simultaneously.
Let's check for any other instances of this component to ensure consistent behavior:
Also applies to: 62-62, 69-71
✅ Verification successful
Let's also check the component implementation to understand the animation interactions:
Hover and ripple animations work harmoniously
The code review shows that the animations will work well together because:
- The ripple effect is implemented using pseudo-elements (::before and ::after) with absolute positioning and z-index: 0
- The hover effect is applied to ButtonContainer with z-index: 1, ensuring it stays above the ripple
- The transitions use different properties: ripple animates opacity/transform while hover affects background-color/fill
- The animations have different triggers: ripple is controlled by the displayRipple prop while hover is user-initiated
The component is used in:
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/StakeMaintenanceButton/index.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DottedMenuButton usage to verify consistent styling
rg -l "DottedMenuButton" --type tsx
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DottedMenuButton usage with ripgrep, trying different extensions
rg -l "DottedMenuButton" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Backup search using fd and grep
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js | xargs grep -l "DottedMenuButton" 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 313
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the component implementation
cat web/src/components/DottedMenuButton.tsx
Length of output: 2231
web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx (1)
6-6: LGTM: Import for centralized hover transition timing.
The addition of hoverShortTransitionTiming import aligns with the PR's objective to standardize hover transitions across components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (2)
16-23: Consider refining the hover state implementation.While the hover transition timing is correctly implemented, there are a few suggestions to improve the hover state:
- Be explicit about which properties are transitioning
- Use theme variables for the background alpha value
- Consider maintaining visual hierarchy with the box-shadow
Consider this implementation:
const StyledCard = styled(Card)` - ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} + transition: background-color ${hoverShortTransitionTiming}, box-shadow ${hoverShortTransitionTiming}; width: 100%; padding: 24px; &:hover { - background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BB; + background-color: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.lightGrey}${theme.opacity.hover || 'BB'}`}; cursor: pointer; - box-shadow: none; + box-shadow: ${({ theme }) => theme.boxShadow.hover || 'none'}; } `;
Line range hint
16-109: Consider enhancing keyboard accessibility.The component uses cursor: pointer and hover states but might benefit from keyboard interaction improvements:
- Add keyboard focus styles matching hover styles
- Ensure the card is focusable if it's interactive
- Add appropriate ARIA attributes for the funding progress
Consider adding:
const StyledCard = styled(Card)` transition: background-color ${hoverShortTransitionTiming}, box-shadow ${hoverShortTransitionTiming}; width: 100%; padding: 24px; - &:hover { + &:hover, &:focus-visible { background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BB; cursor: pointer; box-shadow: none; } `;And in the component:
- <StyledCard ref={ref} hover {...props}> + <StyledCard + ref={ref} + hover + tabIndex={0} + role="button" + {...props} + >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Import aligns with hover transition standardization.
The addition of hoverShortTransitionTiming import supports the PR's goal of centralizing hover transition styles.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/StatsAndFilters.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Consider documenting responsive size ranges.The change from fixed margins to responsive ones using
responsiveSizeimproves the component's adaptability across different screen sizes. The chosen ranges (4-8px for top margin, 16-32px for bottom margin) provide good spacing proportions.Consider adding a comment above the Container styled component to document the responsive size ranges for better maintainability:
// Responsive margins: top(4-8px), bottom(16-32px) const Container = styled.div`Also applies to: 13-14
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx (1)
22-22: Consider maintaining larger margins for the headerWhile reducing vertical spacing aligns with the PR's objectives, headers typically need more breathing room. Consider keeping the margin-bottom closer to the original values for better visual hierarchy.
- margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(16, 24)}; + margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(24, 32)};web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Search.tsx (1)
24-26: Consider adding responsive gap in landscape modeThe landscape mode styling could benefit from maintaining the responsive gap for consistency.
${landscapeStyle( () => css` flex-direction: row; + gap: ${responsiveSize(8, 16)}; ` )}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
web/package.json(1 hunks)web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Search.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/CasesDisplay/StatsAndFilters.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/ExtraStatsDisplay.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/components/LatestCases.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/JurorInfo/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Chart.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/components/ExtraStatsDisplay.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx
- web/src/components/LatestCases.tsx
- web/package.json
- web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (27)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx (5)
4-5: LGTM! Clean import organization.
The imports are well-organized and unnecessary imports have been removed.
19-21: Verify layout implications of container style changes.
The removal of fixed height and padding, along with the transparent background, suggests a shift towards more flexible container sizing. Please ensure these changes don't affect the component's integration with surrounding elements.
Consider documenting these styling decisions in your design system documentation to maintain consistency across similar components.
Line range hint 36-46: LGTM! Core component logic is well-structured.
The Timeline component maintains good separation of concerns, proper type safety, and clear prop handling while improving its styling.
Line range hint 48-109: LGTM! Utility functions are well-implemented.
The helper functions maintain clear responsibilities and proper error handling:
- Period conversion logic handles hidden votes correctly
- Timeline hook manages state efficiently
- Deadline calculations handle undefined cases appropriately
27-34: Verify the impact of increased width values.
The width increase (89% and 98% in landscape) is significant. Please ensure:
- The timeline doesn't overlap with adjacent elements
- The steps remain properly aligned and spaced
- The layout remains consistent across different screen sizes
Run the following to check for potential layout issues:
✅ Verification successful
The width changes appear safe to implement
After analyzing the timeline implementations across the codebase:
- The width change only affects the
CaseDetails/Timeline.tsxcomponent, which is properly contained within aTimeLineContainerthat's set towidth: 100% - The timeline is horizontally centered with
margin: auto - The other timeline implementations (
Resolver/Timeline.tsxandDisputeTimeline.tsx) use different styling approaches and won't be affected - The parent container's full width (100%) acts as a natural boundary, preventing overlap with adjacent elements
The increased widths (89% to 98%) will simply utilize more of the available space while maintaining proper containment and alignment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by the width changes
rg -l "StyledSteps|TimeLineContainer" --type tsx
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for styled components and timeline-related files with proper extension
rg -l "StyledSteps|TimeLineContainer" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Look for any timeline or step-related styled components
rg -l "styled.*timeline|styled.*steps" -i --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Search for potential width-related styles near timeline components
rg "timeline.*width|steps.*width" -i --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
Length of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files with timeline or steps components
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg -l "StyledSteps|TimeLineContainer"
# Look for styled components related to timeline or steps
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg -l "styled.*timeline|styled.*steps" -i
# Search for width styles near timeline components
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "timeline.*width|steps.*width" -i
Length of output: 442
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the timeline components to understand their structure and relationships
cat web/src/pages/Resolver/Timeline.tsx web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx web/src/components/Verdict/DisputeTimeline.tsx
# Look for any container or layout components that might wrap these timelines
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "Timeline.*props|Timeline.*container|Timeline.*layout" -i
Length of output: 10143
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx (4)
10-10: LGTM: Good abstraction of navigation component
The switch from react-router-dom's Link to a custom InternalLink component improves maintainability by centralizing navigation-related logic.
22-22: LGTM: Good practice to reset default margins
Explicitly setting margin to 0 prevents unwanted spacing from browser defaults.
33-35: LGTM: Clean implementation of new navigation component
The replacement of Link with StyledInternalLink is implemented correctly while maintaining the same routing behavior.
16-17: Verify the removal of responsive margin on mobile views
While the fixed spacing provides consistency, removing responsiveSize for margin-bottom might affect the layout on mobile devices.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the extensive search results, I can now generate the final response:
Fixed margin-bottom is consistent with the codebase's responsive design approach
The removal of responsive margin-bottom in favor of a fixed 12px value is actually consistent with the codebase's design patterns. The codebase primarily uses responsiveSize for larger layout spacing (24px-136px ranges) and container dimensions, while keeping smaller spacing values (8px-16px) fixed for better visual consistency in UI elements like headers and cards.
- The
StyledHeadercomponent represents a UI element header where fixed spacing is commonly used - Other header components in the codebase (e.g.,
DisputeCardView,TopJurors/Header) also use fixed values for small margins/gaps - The change aligns with the pattern of using fixed values for component-level spacing while keeping responsive sizing for page-level layout spacing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other responsive margins in the codebase to verify consistency
rg "responsiveSize.*margin" --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsive margins in the codebase using ripgrep
rg "responsiveSize.*margin|margin.*responsiveSize" -t ts -t typescript -t tsx
# Also check for any other usage of responsiveSize in the same file
cat "web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx"
# Look for any styled components with margin definitions in the same file
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = styled.$_`
$$$
margin
$$$
`'
Length of output: 1112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any responsive styling in the codebase to understand the pattern
rg "responsiveSize" -t ts -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any mobile-specific styling or breakpoints
rg "media.*mobile|@media" -t ts
Length of output: 65605
web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx (1)
14-14: LGTM! Spacing adjustments align with design goals.
The reduction in vertical spacing (margin-top: 24-48px, margin-bottom: 12-24px) creates a more compact layout while maintaining responsiveness. These changes are consistent with the overall goal of improving layout spacing across components.
Also applies to: 17-17
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx (1)
19-19: Verify the reduced gap spacing
The gap reduction from 12px to 4px seems too aggressive for a header component. This tight spacing might affect the visual hierarchy and readability between the title and locked stake information, especially in mobile view.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the header components and their styling patterns.
The gap reduction is consistent with the application's design patterns
The 4px gap in the Courts Header is appropriate considering:
- It's used between the title and locked stake info which form a compact header unit
- Similar components use comparable gaps:
- Other header components use gaps ranging from 4-8px for similar title-info layouts
- The Notifications header uses the same 4px gap for related content
- The component has responsive behavior and switches to row layout in landscape mode
- The layout maintains readability with additional spacing through margin-bottom
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar gap values in header components
rg -l 'gap:\s*(4px|4)' | grep -i 'header'
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both header files to understand the context and styling patterns
echo "=== Courts Header.tsx ==="
cat web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Notifications Header ==="
cat web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/index.tsx
# Also search for other gap values in header components for comparison
echo -e "\n=== Other gap values in headers ==="
rg 'gap:' | grep -i header
Length of output: 6172
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/index.tsx (2)
21-21: LGTM: Title margin adjustment
The title's margin-bottom reduction is reasonable and maintains good visual spacing while aligning with the PR's objective to streamline vertical spacing.
17-17: Verify visual separation from preceding content
The significant reduction in margin-top (from 64,80 to 24,48) might affect the visual separation of the TopJurors section. Please verify that this component maintains clear visual boundaries with surrounding content.
✅ Verification successful
Margin-top reduction is consistent with design patterns
The margin-top reduction (24,48) aligns with the established spacing patterns used in other major sections like Community and Courts components. The Home page layout shows that TopJurors is positioned between LatestCases and Community components, maintaining consistent visual rhythm with these standardized spacing values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar margin-top values in section components
rg -l 'margin-top:\s*\$\{responsiveSize\((24|48)' | grep -v 'TopJurors'
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of these margin-top values and their surrounding components
echo "=== Community component margin context ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 'margin-top:\s*\$\{responsiveSize\((24|48)' web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Courts component margin context ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 'margin-top:\s*\$\{responsiveSize\((24|48)' web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx
echo -e "\n=== TopJurors surrounding components ==="
rg -A 10 'export const TopJurors' web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/index.tsx
Length of output: 1014
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the layout structure of the Home page to understand component positioning
echo "=== Home page layout ==="
rg -B 5 -A 15 'const Home' web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx
# Also check what components are imported in Home
echo -e "\n=== Home page imports ==="
rg '^import.*from' web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx
Length of output: 1257
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx (1)
20-20: Consider component complexity when reducing margins
The CasesDisplay is a complex component with multiple interactive elements (title, search, stats, filters). The significant reduction in TitleContainer's margin-bottom (from 32,48 to 12,24) might compress these elements too tightly.
Consider a more moderate reduction:
- margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(12, 24)};
+ margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(24, 32)};web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx (2)
18-18: LGTM: Responsive margin implementation
The use of responsiveSize(24, 48) provides appropriate scaling from mobile (24px) to desktop (48px) viewports.
24-24: Verify the reduced gap impact on visual hierarchy
The gap reduction from 12px to 4px is significant. While the landscape mode maintains a comfortable 16px gap, please ensure this tighter spacing on mobile doesn't impact the visual distinction between court cards.
Consider implementing a design token system for consistent spacing values across the application. This would help maintain spacing consistency and make future updates easier to manage.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (1)
60-60: Verify the impact of Tabs component repositioning
Moving the Tabs component after the Timeline represents a significant change in the component hierarchy. Please ensure this change:
- Aligns with the intended user flow
- Maintains proper tab focus order for accessibility
- Doesn't affect any dependent component behaviors
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:
No impact from Tabs component repositioning
The Tabs component in this case is a self-contained navigation component that:
- Is independent of the Timeline component
- Manages its own state and routing
- Does not have any accessibility dependencies on component order
- Is correctly positioned between the Timeline and the content card
The component order change does not affect:
- User flow (Timeline shows progress, Tabs control content view)
- Tab focus order (managed internally by the Tabs component)
- Component dependencies (Timeline and Tabs operate independently)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any components that might depend on Tabs positioning
rg -l "Timeline.*Tabs|Tabs.*Timeline" --type tsx
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any components that might depend on Tabs positioning, using proper extension
rg -l "Timeline.*Tabs|Tabs.*Timeline" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Look for Tabs component usage patterns
rg -A 5 "<Tabs" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Find the actual Tabs component definition
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx Tabs
Length of output: 274
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Tabs component implementation and its context
cat web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx
# Search for Timeline and Tabs usage in the codebase without file type restrictions
rg -A 5 "Timeline|<Tabs"
# Look for the parent component structure
cat web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx
Length of output: 24925
web/src/pages/Dashboard/JurorInfo/Header.tsx (1)
19-19: LGTM: Consistent responsive margin implementation
The margin-bottom adjustment using responsiveSize(16, 24) aligns with the spacing patterns used in other components, maintaining visual consistency across the application.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx (2)
4-5: LGTM: Responsive margin implementation
The addition of responsive margin using responsiveSize aligns well with the PR's UI improvement objectives. The scaling from 12px (mobile) to 24px (desktop) provides appropriate spacing across different viewport sizes.
Also applies to: 25-25
Line range hint 80-84: Verify the appeal tab disabling logic
The appeal tab disabling logic combines multiple conditions. Let's ensure this logic is tested across different dispute states.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the context gathered, I can now generate the final response:
Appeal tab disabling logic is correctly implemented
The appeal tab disabling logic combines two valid conditions:
- Disables the appeal tab during early periods (< Period.appeal) in the first round
- Disables the appeal tab during the appeal period (Period.appeal) when it's the last possible round based on appeal cost
The implementation is backed by:
isLastRoundutility that checks if appeal cost exceeds safe integer limitsuseAppealCosthook that fetches the current appeal cost from the smart contract- Proper period index validation against the appeal period (index 3)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files covering this component
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx "Tabs" src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/
# Look for similar period-based tab disabling patterns
rg -A 3 "currentPeriodIndex.*disabled" src/
Length of output: 269
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files covering this component
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx "Tabs"
# Look for similar period-based tab disabling patterns
rg -A 3 "currentPeriodIndex.*disabled"
# Search for test cases related to appeal tab disabling
rg -A 5 "appeal.*tab.*disabled|disabled.*appeal.*tab"
# Look for the implementation context
rg -B 5 -A 10 "updatedTabs\[3\]\.disabled"
Length of output: 65711
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the implementation context around the appeal tab disabling logic
rg -B 5 -A 10 "updatedTabs\[3\]\.disabled" web/
# Search for test files related to tabs
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx "Tabs" web/
# Look for appeal-related logic in the codebase
rg -A 3 "isLastRound|appealCost" web/
Length of output: 5815
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx (1)
4-5: LGTM: Enhanced responsive layout
The styling changes improve the component's responsiveness and spacing:
- Added vertical gap (12px) improves item separation
- Responsive margin-top ensures consistent scaling (12px to 16px)
Also applies to: 18-18, 20-20
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Search.tsx (1)
21-21: LGTM: Responsive gap implementation
The change from fixed to responsive gap using responsiveSize(8, 16) improves the component's adaptability across different screen sizes.
web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx (2)
28-28: Verify padding adjustments across different screen sizes
The padding changes reduce vertical spacing from ${responsiveSize(32, 80)} to ${responsiveSize(32, 48)} at the top and from ${responsiveSize(76, 96)} to ${responsiveSize(40, 60)} at the bottom. While this creates a more compact layout, we should ensure it maintains proper visual hierarchy.
✅ Verification successful
Padding adjustments are consistent with application-wide patterns
The padding changes in Dashboard/index.tsx align with the established responsive design patterns across the application. The search results show that:
-
Similar components use comparable padding ranges:
- Home page:
padding: 16px ${responsiveSize(24, 132)} ${responsiveSize(40, 60)} - Cases page:
padding: ${responsiveSize(32, 48)} ${responsiveSize(24, 136)} ${responsiveSize(40, 60)} - Courts page:
padding: ${responsiveSize(32, 48)} ${responsiveSize(24, 136)} ${responsiveSize(40, 60)}
- Home page:
-
The new values (32,48), (24,136), (40,60) match the consistent spacing pattern used throughout the application for container components, ensuring visual harmony across different sections.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other Container components with similar padding patterns
rg -l "responsiveSize.*\d+,\s*\d+.*responsiveSize.*\d+,\s*\d+.*responsiveSize.*\d+,\s*\d+" --type tsx
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other Container components with similar padding patterns, trying different file extensions
rg -l "responsiveSize.*\d+,\s*\d+.*responsiveSize.*\d+,\s*\d+.*responsiveSize.*\d+,\s*\d+" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx --type js
# Let's also check for the specific responsiveSize usage pattern
rg "padding:.*responsiveSize" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx --type js
# Find all files that might contain responsiveSize function
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js | xargs rg "responsiveSize"
Length of output: 23156
34-37: Review vertical rhythm with reduced margins
The margin adjustments create a more compact layout:
- StyledCasesDisplay margin-top is now using responsive sizing
- Title's margin-bottom is reduced from
${responsiveSize(16, 48)}to${responsiveSize(12, 24)}
These changes align with the PR's objective of updating spacing, but we should ensure they maintain proper visual hierarchy.
✅ Verification successful
Margin adjustments maintain proper visual hierarchy
The margin changes are appropriate and maintain proper visual hierarchy:
-
The
responsiveSizefunction ensures smooth scaling between viewport sizes:margin-top: ${responsiveSize(32, 48)}scales from 32px to 48pxmargin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(12, 24)}scales from 12px to 24px
-
The spacing aligns with the container's padding which uses similar responsive ranges:
- Container padding:
${responsiveSize(32, 48)} ${responsiveSize(24, 136)} ${responsiveSize(40, 60)} - This creates consistent vertical rhythm with the content
- Container padding:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar margin patterns
rg "margin-(top|bottom):\s*\$\{responsiveSize" --type tsx
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar margin patterns, trying different file extensions
rg "margin-(top|bottom):\s*\$\{responsiveSize" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx --type js
# Also search for the specific responsiveSize function usage to understand the pattern
rg "responsiveSize\(" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx --type js
Length of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for margin patterns and responsiveSize usage without specifying file types
rg "margin-(top|bottom):\s*\$\{responsiveSize"
rg "responsiveSize\("
# Find all potential React/TypeScript files to understand what extensions are used
fd "\.(tsx?|jsx?)$"
Length of output: 39440
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the specific file and its responsiveSize usage
rg -A 5 -B 5 "margin-(top|bottom):\s*\$\{responsiveSize" web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx
# Search for the responsiveSize function definition
rg -l "responsiveSize" web/src/styles/
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the responsiveSize implementation
cat web/src/styles/responsiveSize.ts
# Get more context around the margin changes in Dashboard/index.tsx
rg -A 10 -B 10 "StyledCasesDisplay" web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx
Length of output: 2034
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Chart.tsx (3)
4-5: LGTM: Explicit import of responsiveSize utility
Good practice to make the dependency explicit rather than relying on indirect imports.
27-27: Verify dropdown alignment change impact
The alignment change from end to start could affect the layout. Please ensure this aligns with the design system and maintains consistency with other dropdowns in the application.
✅ Verification successful
Alignment change is consistent with application patterns
The align-self: start property is already used in multiple components across the application, particularly in form-related contexts (Parameters, VotingOptions). This change aligns with the existing pattern where most interactive elements use start alignment, with only specific UI elements like the MiniGuides using end alignment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other StyledDropdown components to verify alignment consistency
rg "align-self:\s*(start|end)" --type tsx
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for align-self CSS property in all files, including styled-components
rg "align-self:\s*(start|end)" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,css,scss}"
Length of output: 376
20-20: Verify margin consistency with other chart components
The margin-bottom reduction from ${responsiveSize(32, 48)} to ${responsiveSize(16, 32)} aligns with the overall spacing updates in the PR.
✅ Verification successful
Margin-bottom value is consistent with design patterns
The margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(16, 32)} in Chart.tsx aligns with the common spacing patterns across the codebase. Similar margin values are used in multiple components, particularly:
StatsAndFilters.tsx:margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(16, 32)}- Multiple components in Popup directory use
margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(16, 32)} - Other components use variations around this range (12-24, 16-24) for vertical spacing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other chart components with similar margin patterns
rg "margin-bottom.*responsiveSize" --type tsx --glob "**/Chart*.tsx"
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other chart components with similar margin patterns, using ripgrep without file type restriction
rg "margin-bottom.*responsiveSize" --glob "**/Chart*.ts*"
Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any usage of responsiveSize with margins in the codebase to understand the general spacing patterns
rg "margin.*responsiveSize" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 10246
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 2a8c9f9 and detected 3 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
kemuru
deleted the
feat/update-ui-components-library-version-and-adjust-things
branch
PR-Codex overview
This PR primarily focuses on updating styles across various components, enhancing layout responsiveness, and incorporating transition effects for better user experience. Additionally, it upgrades the
@kleros/ui-components-librarydependency.Detailed summary
responsiveSize.hoverShortTransitionTiming.@kleros/ui-components-libraryfrom^2.16.0to^2.17.0.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
InputDisplayandFilters.Documentation
Chores