-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 608
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added event format to dispatcher #8096
Conversation
Signed-off-by: EraKin575 <[email protected]>
Hi @EraKin575. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a knative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8096 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 67.87% 67.92% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 368 368
Lines 17554 17564 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 11915 11931 +16
+ Misses 4894 4887 -7
- Partials 745 746 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice start @EraKin575 - I left some feedback
@Cali0707 thanks for your review. I have a question though. How can I check for binary format in unit tests |
Signed-off-by: EraKin575 <[email protected]>
In the http receiver handler function, you will be able to:
|
Thanks! Will try this |
Hey @EraKin575 any updates here? Anything we can help you with? |
got busy with some stuff. I will finish this issue ASAP |
@Cali0707 , I can't quite get the http receiver part, can you please explain it in a bit more detail? |
Yeah, in the |
Signed-off-by: EraKin575 <[email protected]>
thanks @Cali0707 ! I have done another commit. Please review it and advise me for any further changes |
Signed-off-by: EraKin575 <[email protected]>
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work @EraKin575 - just a few changes and then this should be good to merge :)
Signed-off-by: EraKin575 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: EraKin575 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Cali0707, EraKin575 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
added event format in event dispatcher
Fixes #8074
Proposed Changes
Pre-review Checklist
Release Note
Docs