Release 1.02

knizhnik · Mar 31, 2014 · f125cff · f125cff
1 parent 1a48526
commit f125cff
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 4 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+--- Release version 1.01 (22.03.2014) -------------------------------------
+
+Initial version
+
+--- Release version 1.02 (01.04.2014) -------------------------------------
+
+Multisegment implementation of copying garbage collector
diff --git a/copygc/gc.cpp b/copygc/gc.cpp
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ namespace GC
         for (Pin* pin = pinnedObjects; pin != NULL; pin = pin->next) { 
             (void)_copy(pin->obj);
         }
-        // And finally copy and andject all roots
+        // And finally copy and adjust all roots
         for (Root* root = roots; root != NULL; root = root->next) { 
             root->copy(this); 
         }

diff --git a/makefile b/makefile
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ clean:
 	rm -f *.o *.a *.so *.so.* $(GC_EXAMPLES) 
 
 tgz: clean
-	cd ..; tar --exclude=.svn -chvzf cppgc-1.01.tar.gz cppgc
+	cd ..; tar --exclude=.svn -chvzf cppgc-1.02.tar.gz cppgc
 
 zip: clean
 	cd ..; zip -r cppgc.zip cppgc

diff --git a/mark_n_sweep_gc.txt b/mark_n_sweep_gc.txt
@@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ of cloned object:
 
 Copying garbage collector is really  fast, because it is not using standard malloc/free. Testgc example shows about 8 times 
 better results with copying garbage collector than with mark&sweep garbage collector.
+But lack of finalization and necessity to pin object are also significant drawbacks.
 
 
 Let's now compare performance.