-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
STONEBLD-2648: fix OWNERS files #1273
Conversation
66e012e
to
9fe2927
Compare
9fe2927
to
701c873
Compare
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | |||
approvers: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will it mean that we'll be pinged to all PRs in the repo even the tasks we don't have relation to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is kind of default.. if some task don't have OWNERS file..and other sub-directories like pipelines
or .tekton
where OWNERS file are not there.. then it will fall back to OWNERS file in the root for assigning reviews.
@@ -1,2 +1 @@ | |||
|
|||
opdev | |||
#opdev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the OWNERS should be @skattoju (anyone else?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it have to be github usernames ? We have @preflight-dev
in slack that pings preflight team members. I had initially set it as opdev to reflect this github org https://github.com/opdev Other team members include @acornett21 @bcrochet @komish
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the owners file with github id's shared.
- tkdchen | ||
- tisutisu | ||
- tnevrlka | ||
- MartinBasti |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also add the gold team as the prefetch task maintainers? At least a few additional members apart from @MartinBasti? E.g. @eskultety @brunoapimentel @taylormadore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay added them in the build-team
alias.
701c873
to
257ef65
Compare
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@ | |||
approvers: | |||
- skattoju |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you should add another devs that are mentioned in the comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated now. Thanks.
Use correct format for the OWNERS files
Before you complete this pull request ...
Look for any open pull requests in the repository with the title "e2e-tests update" and
see if there are recent e2e-tests updates that will be applicable to your change.