Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STONEBLD-2648: fix OWNERS files #1273

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tisutisu
Copy link
Contributor

@tisutisu tisutisu commented Aug 9, 2024

Use correct format for the OWNERS files

Before you complete this pull request ...

Look for any open pull requests in the repository with the title "e2e-tests update" and
see if there are recent e2e-tests updates that will be applicable to your change.

@tisutisu tisutisu marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2024 12:29
OWNERS_ALIASES Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
task/apply-tags/OWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
approvers:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will it mean that we'll be pinged to all PRs in the repo even the tasks we don't have relation to?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is kind of default.. if some task don't have OWNERS file..and other sub-directories like pipelines or .tekton where OWNERS file are not there.. then it will fall back to OWNERS file in the root for assigning reviews.

task/ecosystem-cert-preflight-checks/OWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
task/oci-copy-oci-ta/OWNERS Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -1,2 +1 @@

opdev
#opdev
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the OWNERS should be @skattoju (anyone else?)

Copy link
Contributor

@skattoju skattoju Aug 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it have to be github usernames ? We have @preflight-dev in slack that pings preflight team members. I had initially set it as opdev to reflect this github org https://github.com/opdev Other team members include @acornett21 @bcrochet @komish

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tisutisu tisutisu Aug 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated the owners file with github id's shared.

- tkdchen
- tisutisu
- tnevrlka
- MartinBasti
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also add the gold team as the prefetch task maintainers? At least a few additional members apart from @MartinBasti? E.g. @eskultety @brunoapimentel @taylormadore

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay added them in the build-team alias.

@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
approvers:
- skattoju
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmorhun mmorhun Aug 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you should add another devs that are mentioned in the comment

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated now. Thanks.

@tisutisu tisutisu enabled auto-merge August 13, 2024 13:40
@tisutisu tisutisu added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 13, 2024
Merged via the queue into konflux-ci:main with commit 05f4d40 Aug 13, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants