Migrate to use uv instead of poetry

[gaborbernat]

Use hatchling instead of poetry for backend, uv otherwise.

Resolves #2220

[gaborbernat]

@koxudaxi any update on this? I have another bug I'd like to addrtess, and this is blocking me 😊

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (dd92cd0) to head (125b76b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              main     #2288    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files           38        38            
  Lines         4307      4305     -2     
  Branches       994       838   -156     
==========================================
- Hits          4307      4305     -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	99.67% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2288 will improve performances by 11.57%

_{Comparing gaborbernat:main (125b76b) with main (dd92cd0)}

🎉 Hooray! pytest-codspeed just leveled up to 3.1.2!

A heads-up, this is a breaking change and it might affect your current performance baseline a bit. But here's the exciting part - it's packed with new, cool features and promises improved result stability 🥳!
Curious about what's new? Visit our releases page to delve into all the awesome details about this new version.

Summary

⚡ 3 improvements
✅ 28 untouched benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
⚡	test_main_jsonschema_collapsed_external_references	80.9 ms	72.5 ms	+11.57%
⚡	test_main_jsonschema_multiple_files	82 ms	74.4 ms	+10.24%
⚡	test_main_jsonschema_no_empty_collapsed_external_model	51 ms	46.2 ms	+10.44%

[gaborbernat]

Ah, I slighthly renamed the GitHub actions so shows more info in my browser without needing to click into it, which causes the missing checks. Should I restore the old naming or you OK updating the required checks?

[koxudaxi]

Thank you very much for creating PR!!
Please keep the current naming as is, and I will update the required check names after merging.
It seems the coverage has decreased, so could you please fix only that part?

[gaborbernat]

Hmm, unsure why the coverage decreased, I haven't touched any of those files 🤔

[gaborbernat]

Orthogonal to this change set, but given that uv does not yet support a task manager, would you be open to add tox-uv to this project, so easier to setup these envs locally? 😊 this would replace the shell scripts also. uv plans to add task manager support later this year at which point we could swap over.

[koxudaxi]

Looking at https://app.codecov.io/gh/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator/pull/2288/indirect-changes#6e0ac031c1cc8fb390d8111b0e1d795b-L194,
it seems the isort4.x version is not covered.
However, checking the logs at https://github.com/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator/actions/runs/13039215945/job/36434145108?pr=2288#step:5:15,
it appears isort4.x is installed correctly 🤔

I apologize, but it's getting late here so I will check this again tomorrow.

Regarding tox-uv, while it's welcome, I will also read the documentation tomorrow myself.

[gaborbernat]

Regarding tox-uv, while it's welcome, I will also read the documentation tomorrow myself.

Disclaimer I am the auther and maintainer of both tox and tox-uv; so if you have any questions you can ask 😊 Yeah I saw the same, so will need to check. Will put in a commit to add tox-uv (as helps me to try to reproduce this easier locally) and circle back.

[koxudaxi]

The coverage was fixed after re-running only that specific task.
It's a very silly phenomenon😣
Thank you. I'll be back tomorrow to handle this and other PRs.
I'll leave another message here or somewhere else.
Thank you very much for your cooperation!!

[gaborbernat]

Another orthogonal question, would you be open to switch to a src layout? 😆 https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/discussions/src-layout-vs-flat-layout/