Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove duplicated iptables subnet forward rules #4860

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

oilbeater
Copy link
Collaborator

The ipset based iptables rules have already did the work.

Pull Request

What type of this PR

Examples of user facing changes:

  • Performance

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #4859

@oilbeater oilbeater requested a review from changluyi December 20, 2024 10:16
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. performance Anything that can make Kube-OVN faster refactor labels Dec 20, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 20, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12430023583

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.01%) to 22.14%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12424345165: 0.01%
Covered Lines: 10164
Relevant Lines: 45907

💛 - Coveralls

The ipset based iptables rules have already did the work.

Signed-off-by: oilbeater <[email protected]>
@oilbeater
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The subnet metrics relies on these rules, we should consider a batch way to update these rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Anything that can make Kube-OVN faster refactor size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] kube-ovn-cni consums lots of CPU when there are lots of subnets
2 participants