Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements to control C-0262 #519

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Oct 9, 2023

Overview

This PR adds the following improvements to control C-0262 as specified in SUB-2185 :

  1. change name to Anonymous user has RoleBinding
  2. delete apiserver rule (leave only rolebinding check)
  3. add assisted remediation - deletePath pointing to subject
  4. change severity to 7 (high)

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
…85-fix-control-C-0262

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 9, 2023
@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Enhancements to control C-0262
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces several improvements to control C-0262, including a name change, removal of the apiserver rule, addition of a deletePath pointing to the subject, and an increase in severity. The changes aim to enhance the security checks related to anonymous user access in the system.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and mostly involve modifications to existing code rather than addition of new complex logic.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The changes made in this PR seem to be well thought out and are likely to improve the security checks related to anonymous user access. However, it would be beneficial to include tests that verify the new functionality and changes.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

Copy link
Contributor

@alegrey91 alegrey91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ;)
Add the parenthesis at the end of the description as I asked in the comment.

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
…golibrary into SUB-2185-fix-control-C-0262

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <[email protected]>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit 46cdc49 into master Oct 9, 2023
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants