-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: Upgrade open-component-model/ocm to v0.4.0 #1808
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7295bd3
Bump ocm dep
lindnerby 88849ce
Use new identity pkg
lindnerby 4b0a72e
Remove unnecessary register calls
lindnerby e08fd1f
don't close the archive
lindnerby 107e20a
fix test
lindnerby d9be8dd
offer init component descriptor
ruanxin 2436019
create ComponentDescriptor before CreateArchive
ruanxin b70ce80
Remove unecessary git source code. Refactor module.go
lindnerby 9a3fac0
fix test
lindnerby 4bbba59
wrap test cases
lindnerby 2a9eaa8
apply review suggestions
lindnerby 111faad
apply review suggestions
lindnerby File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
return nil
is not expected, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is, the flow just got inverted since this is the last step it can be skipped if there is no reg given
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but if no regstry given, this create module command is meaningless, right? It can't push image to remote.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i guess it's like this because the command could also be used for just persisting the archive locally to inspect layers? also the registry flag is also not mandatory which is weird if the command should be meaningless without it. i don't know the intentions/requirements when this command was implemented, but agree that this should have a second look at some point.
and it's not only the registry flow that seems inconsistent: also the generation of the template could be interesting to be used without registry for debugging purposes, but at the moment the flow ends there