Исправить stack level для предупреждений

[leshchenko1979]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.55%. Comparing base (267215d) to head (e29d103).

❗ Current head e29d103 differs from pull request most recent head 12f0cb3. Consider uploading reports for the commit 12f0cb3 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #228      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.98%   89.55%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         563      584      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits          501      523      +22     
+ Misses         62       61       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @leshchenko1979 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

General suggestions:

• Consider optimizing the stack inspection process for performance, as it can be expensive.
• Review the handling of module filenames to avoid potential redundancy and ensure edge cases are covered.
• Ensure robust error handling when accessing and traversing the call stack.
• Expand testing to cover more edge cases and real-world scenarios for the new utility function.
• Evaluate the complexity of the new utility function and consider simplifying it if possible to maintain code maintainability.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 2 issues found
• 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}